(1)
SATYANAND SINGH ...APPELLANT Vs.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS D.D
20/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Service Law - Armed Forces – Medical Fitness –Misdiagnosis HIV and Dismissal - Appeal against the dismissal of the appellant from the Indian Army due to a misdiagnosis of AIDS - Medical report wrongly diagnosed neuro tuberculosis as AIDS defining illness, leading to discharge under Rule 13 (3) of the Army Rules, 1954 - Incorrect application of medical guidelines and overlooking of CD4 ...
(2)
TAPAS KUMAR DAS …APPELLANT Vs.
HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. …RESPONDENTS D.D
19/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Civil Appeal – Eligibility for LPG Distributorship – Interpretation of Advertisement Terms – interpretation of an advertisement for LPG distributorships and the eligibility criteria related to the location of the distributorship. [Para 2-7, 14-15]
Advertisement Interpretation – Location Specification for Distributorship – The Court examined the specifics ...
(3)
NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
ZILLION INFRAPROJECTS PVT.LTD. …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
19/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Civil Appeal – Interpretation of Contract Terms – Arbitration Clause – The Supreme Court deliberated on whether the arbitration clause from a primary contract was effectively incorporated into a subsequent Letter of Intent, thereby governing the dispute resolution mechanism for the parties involved. [Para 5-7, 16-17]
Contractual Reference to Arbitration Clause &ndash...
(4)
JUGAL KISHORE KHANNA(D) THR LRS & ANR. ... APPELLANTS Vs.
SUDHIR KHANNA & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS D.D
19/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Property Law – Partition and Settlement – Joint Family Property – a dispute concerning the ownership of properties arising from a joint Hindu family. The appellants contested the High Court's decision which allowed the respondent's claim on the Kamla Nagar property and dismissed the appellants' claim on the Malcha Marg property. [Para 1-4]
Kamla Nag...
(5)
APOORVA ARORA & ANR. ETC. …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
19/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Freedom of Speech and Expression – Obscenity and Decency – In an appeal challenging the FIR registered for alleged obscene content in a web-series, the Supreme Court delved into the nuances of Sections 67 and 67A of the IT Act. The Court examined whether the use of profane language in the web-series constituted obscenity or sexually explicit content warranting pros...
(6)
PUNEET SABHARWAL …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
CBI …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
19/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Assets Disproportionate to Known Sources of Income – The Supreme Court considered the appeals of Puneet Sabharwal and R.C. Sabharwal against the judgment of the Delhi High Court. Both appellants were charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for possessing assets disproportionate to their known sources of income. The...
(7)
SHIV PRASAD SEMWAL …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
19/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Defamation – Freedom of Speech – Court examined the legality of FIR of offences under Sections 153A, 500, 501, 504, 34, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against the appellant, the director of an e-newspaper, for allegedly publishing defamatory content. The bench evaluated the applicability of these provisions in the context of freedom of speech and the thres...
(8)
JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
ADANI POWER RAJASTHAN LTD. & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)/APPLICANT(S D.D
18/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Late Payment Surcharge Dispute – Request for payment of Rs.1376.35 crore as LPS by Adani Power Rajasthan Limited (APRL) from Rajasthan Discoms under PPA-2010 – Applicant relies on Article 8.3.5 of the PPA-2010 – Main appeal related to additional payment claims under PPA-2010 due to change in law was previously disposed of [Paras 2, 4].
Judicial History – The Su...
(9)
M. Radheshyamlal …APPELLANT Vs.
V Sandhya and Anr. Etc. …RESPONDENTS D.D
18/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Civil Law – Adverse Possession – Inadequate Pleadings and Proof –Court, in this case, clarified the legal principles governing the claim of adverse possession. The Court emphasized that such a claim requires adequate pleadings and proof, including the establishment of continuous, peaceful, and open possession adverse to the true owner for over twelve years. [Para 9, 12-16]
Evi...