(1)
UNION OF INDIA …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
BARAKATHULLAH ETC. …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
22/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Bail Under UAPA – Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Bail Grant – Appellant challenged High Court's order granting bail to accused charged with offenses under IPC and UAPA related to activities of Popular Front of India (PFI) – Accused were allegedly involved in promoting terrorism, imparting weapon training, and conspiring to establish Islamic rule ...
(2)
RAM MURTI SHARMA …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
22/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Bail Application – Dismissal – The Supreme Court deliberated on the bail granted to the accused in a murder case by the High Court, emphasizing the need for detailed reasoning in bail decisions. The case involved the alleged involvement of the respondent in a murder, not initially named in the FIR but later implicated through investigation. [Para 2-8]
...
(3)
Amudha …APPELLANT Vs.
The State represented by the Inspector of Police & Anr. …RESPONDENTS D.D
22/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Abetment of Suicide (Section 306 IPC) – Quashing of Proceedings – applicability of Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code in the context of the appellant’s involvement in the alleged abetment of suicide. The Court examined the evidence and allegations to ascertain the presence of incitement or instigation leading to the suicide. [Para 1, 7-11]
...
(4)
M/S ACME PAPERS LTD. ...PETITIONER(S) Vs.
M/S. CHINTAMAN DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ORS. …RESPONDENTS(S) D.D
22/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Transfer of Civil Suit – Jurisdiction – Court considered the appropriate jurisdiction for a civil suit involving specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding related to immovable property. The suit was filed by respondent no.1 in Sehore, Madhya Pradesh, with a counter-suit by petitioner in Calcutta, West Bengal. The Court evaluated the principles under Sections 16 and 20...
(5)
THIRUMOORTHY ...APPELLANT(S) Vs.
STATE REPRESENTED BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ...RESPONDENT(S) D.D
22/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Conviction and Sentencing of Juvenile - Thirumoorthy, a juvenile, convicted for various offenses by the trial court and High Court without adherence to Juvenile Justice Act provisions – Conviction for offenses under IPC and POCSO Act – Sentences ranging from 1 to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment [Para 2, 9, 31].
Non-Compliance with JJ Act - Flagrant violation of JJ Act - ...
(6)
SABITA PAUL … APPELLANT(S) Vs.
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. … RESPONDENT(S) D.D
22/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Background of Case – FIR lodged based on allegations of using obscene photographs for extortion and blackmail by Sabita Paul and her son Supratim Paul – Supratim already granted anticipatory bail [Para 2, 3, 7]
Criminal Law – Anticipatory Bail – Principle of Parity in Bail Grant – principle of parity in granting anticipatory bail in the context of a...
(7)
AWUNGSHI CHIRMAYO AND ANR. ...APPELLANTS Vs.
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS D.D
22/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Unresolved Homicide – CBI Investigation Ordered – In Awungshi Chirmayi and Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors., the Supreme Court dealt with the circumstances of an unresolved homicide case involving a 25-year-old woman from Manipur. The case exhibited inconsistencies and inconclusive evidence from the initial investigations. The Supreme Court, noting the i...
(8)
M/S. DIVGI METAL WARES LTD. …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
M/S. DIVGI METAL WARES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION & ANR. …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
21/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Legal Validity of Employee Transfers - Standing Orders under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Challenge to transfer of employees by M/s. Divgi Metal Wares Ltd. under Clause 20 of the Standing Orders - Clause included transfers within company's establishments across India - High Court judgment set aside by Supreme Court, ruling transfers valid. [Paras 1, 2.1-2.8, 3-17]
&nb...
(9)
NENAVATH BUJJI ETC. ...APPELLANT(S) Vs.
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) D.D
21/03/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Preventive Detention – Validity – Analysis of Legality – validity of the preventive detention order passed under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986. The appellant was preventively detained on the grounds of involvement in a series of thefts and robberies, purportedly disturbing public order. The court scrutinized the role of the detaining authority and the...