(1)
T. KOCHA ..... Vs.
STATE OF KERALA & ORS. .....Respondent D.D
13/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts:T. Kocha, the appellant, claims to be a member of the Thandan Community.Dispute arises regarding the Thandan Community's status as Scheduled Caste, leading to litigation.Amendments to the Scheduled Castes Order and subsequent orders from the State Government create confusion regarding the inclusion of Ezhavas/Thiyyas known as Thandans.Issues:Whether the appellant belongs to the Thandan ...
(2)
AMANULLAH AND ANR. ..... Vs.
STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. .....Respondent D.D
12/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts: The case involves the murder of a woman, with the First Information Report (FIR) filed by the deceased's husband accusing appellant no. 2 and another person. Witnesses during the investigation later implicated the husband in the murder. Harassment of witnesses and subsequent threats by the husband led to further legal actions.Issues: The quashing of the cognizance order by the High Cou...
(3)
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Vs.
M/S ANANT RAJ AGENCIES PVT. LTD. .....Respondent D.D
12/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts:Original lessee granted a 20-year lease with an option for a further 20 years.Lessee sought lease renewal, but breaches occurred, leading to DDA's termination notice in 1968.Four years later, the lease was terminated.Original lessee filed a suit for perpetual injunction against DDA.During the second appeal, the property was sold to the respondent through a compromise decree.Issues:Valid...
(4)
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. ..... Vs.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. .....Respondent D.D
12/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts:A sample of Kesar Pista ice cream taken by the Food Inspector was declared adulterated by the Public Analyst.One co-accused exercised the right under Section 13(2) of the PFA Act, leading to the request for re-analysis by the Central Food Laboratory (CFL).CFL reported the received sample as deteriorated and not fit for analysis.High Court rejected the appellant's plea to quash the case,...
(5)
KEDAR MISHRA ..... Vs.
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. .....Respondent D.D
12/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
FACTS:The appeals arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Patna.The appellant, Kedar Mishra, claimed the right of pre-emption under Section 16(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act.The High Court dismissed the writ petitions on the grounds of non-compliance with Rule 19 and Form L.C. 13, affirming the order of the Additional Member, Board of Revenue.ISSUES:Whether there was suff...
(6)
KUSUM HARILAL SONI ..... Vs.
CHANDRIKA NANDLAL MEHTA AND ANR. .....Respondent D.D
12/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts:The appellant filed a suit for eviction against respondent no. 1 due to the expiration of a license agreement in 1994.The competent authority ordered the respondent to hand over possession and pay compensation from November 1, 1994.Despite possession being handed over in 2001, the compensation was not paid, and the respondent allegedly transferred the property to respondent no. 2.Issues:Whet...
(7)
V. SEJAPPA ... Vs.
STATE BY POLICE INSPECTOR LOKAYUKTA, CHITRADURGA. ..Respondent D.D
12/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts:Complainant, N. Ramakrishnappa, accused the appellant, V. Sejappa, of demanding a bribe of Rs. 5,000 for processing pension papers and other retiral benefits.A trap was laid by the Lokayukta police, resulting in the appellant's arrest with tainted currency notes.The trial court acquitted the appellant, citing reasons such as absence of proof of demand, doubts about document submissions,...
(8)
K.S. JOSEPH ..... Vs.
PHILIPS CARBON BLACK LTD. AND ANOTHER .....Respondent D.D
11/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts: The appellant, K.S. Joseph, appealed against the rejection of his plea to quash the order of cognizance and issuance of summons in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The case involved bounced cheques and issues related to delay, jurisdiction, and compliance with procedural requirements.Issues: The delay in filing the complaint, non-compliance with Section 200 ...
(9)
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ..... Vs.
CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE & ORS. .....Respondent D.D
11/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts:Review petitions filed against the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 18th July 2013.Initially placed before a Three-Judge Bench but later ordered to be heard by a Five-Judge Bench.Notice served through substituted service, and matters heard after necessary publication.Various judgments on the scope of review considered.Issues:Whether the judgment in Christian Medical College case needs rec...