(1)
MESSER HOLDINGS LTD. ..... Vs.
SHYAM MADANMOHAN RUIA & OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
19/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts: The case involves the withdrawal of a suit where MGG, a German company, entered into a Share Purchase and Cooperation Agreement with the shareholders of an Indian company. The ownership title in MGG's shares is acknowledged until the date of the consent award. Claims by GGL and MHL for title over the shares stem from MGG's prior title and an alleged subsequent transfer pursuant to...
(2)
M/S VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANOTHER. ..... Vs.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
19/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
FACTS:The appellant, M/S Videocon Industries Ltd., and another were facing trial for alleged contravention of provisions under FERA.Adjudicating authority imposed penalties against the appellant during the trial.The tribunal, in an appeal, found no contravention of FERA, setting aside the penalties.Criminal proceedings continued, and the accused sought discharge based on the tribunal's decisi...
(3)
RAMESH RAJAGOPAL ..... Vs.
DEVI POLYMERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent D.D
19/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts:The appellant, a Director in Devi Polymers Private Limited, faced criminal proceedings under various sections of IPC and IT Act.The dispute involved the creation of a website and payments made for it, with allegations of criminal breach of trust, forgery, and conspiracy against the appellant.The appellant, as Director of Unit 'C,' engaged consultants to enhance consultancy services...
(4)
KUNAPAREDDY @ NOOKALA SHANKA BALAJI ..... Vs.
KUNAPAREDDY SWARNA KUMARI AND ANOTHER. .....Respondent D.D
18/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts: The case involves a petition filed by the wife (respondent) against the husband (appellant) and his family members under the DV Act, alleging physical and mental harassment, as well as dowry demands. The wife seeks various reliefs under Sections 18 and 20 of the DV Act.Issues: Whether the court has the power to allow an amendment to the petition or complaint filed under the DV Act.Held: The...
(5)
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ..... Vs.
V.N. PUBLIC HEALTH & EDUCATIONAL TRUST & ORS. .....Respondent D.D
18/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts:V.N. Public Health & Educational Trust applied for the establishment of a new medical college for the academic year 2016-17.The Essentiality Certificate issued by the Government of Kerala was found to be invalid by the Medical Council of India (MCI) due to non-compliance with the prescribed format.The MCI recommended disapproval of the application to the Central Government.The Trust appr...
(6)
PALLAV SHETH ..... Vs.
CANARA BANK .....Respondent D.D
13/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts:Appellant Pallav Sheth convicted for dishonest misappropriation of shares related to a transaction with Canara Bank.Appellant admitted liability of RS. 83,00,000 for 20,000 shares but failed to honor cheques.Defense claiming it as a civil liability without criminal intent was rejected by the Special Court.Issues:Whether the appellant is guilty of dishonest misappropriation of shares?Whether ...
(7)
RAJ KUMAR ..... Vs.
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondent D.D
13/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts: Raj Kumar, a permanent driver in a public school, was retrenched by the Managing Committee of the school, citing his surplus status. The case involved the appellant challenging the retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the Delhi School Education Act, 1973.Issues:Compliance with the retrenchment procedure under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act.Validity of retren...
(8)
RISHABH CHAND JAIN & ANOTHER ..... Vs.
GINESH CHANDRA JAIN .....Respondent D.D
13/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts:The suit was filed for a declaration that a Municipality survey Khatiyan entered in favor of defendant No.1 was wrong and not binding on the plaintiff.The trial court dismissed the suit on the grounds of Res Judicata and lack of cause of action.The plaintiff filed a revision before the High Court, contending that no appeal was maintainable as the suit was dismissed without framing an issue.I...
(9)
SHEIKH SINTHA MADHAR @ JAFFER @ SINTHA ETC. ..... Vs.
STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE .....Respondent D.D
13/04/2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts: After the Coimbatore serial blasts, a conspiracy was alleged involving two groups (A1 to A6 and A8 to A13) to murder Dr. Sridhar, a BJP Town Secretary in Trichy. The daughter of the deceased (PW1) witnessed the murder, and charges were filed against the accused under various sections, including Sections 148, 302, 201, and 120B of IPC.Issues: The reliability of eyewitness testimony, the vali...