MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

High Court of Allahabad Criticizes Systemic Failures in Legal Representation for Marginalized Sections

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Allahabad, presided over by Hon'ble Justice Ajay Bhanot, has denied the bail application of Titu, who has been incarcerated since August 2017. The court highlighted the applicant's prolonged absence before the trial court and the systemic failures in providing legal aid to marginalized sections of society.

Titu, the applicant, was nominated in a criminal case in 2005 but was not arrested until August 10, 2017. He belongs to a marginalized section of society and did not have the resources or legal aid to apply for bail earlier. This is his first bail application.

The court noted the applicant's failure to appear before the trial court for over a decade. Despite his arrest in 2017, no satisfactory explanation was provided for this extended absence. The bail application itself was poorly drafted, indicating inadequate legal assistance.

Justice Bhanot emphasized the systemic failures in providing legal aid to marginalized individuals. He remarked, "Prima facie, it is evident that the applicant has been without legal aid since his arrest and even at this stage, the drafting has been less than satisfactory. No assistance is forthcoming from the applicant's counsel."

To address these deficiencies, the court appointed Shri Rajiv Lochan Shukla as amicus curiae and directed the High Court Legal Services Committee to assist in filing an affidavit on behalf of the applicant. The learned District Judge of Meerut was instructed to provide all relevant details to the amicus curiae promptly.

Justice Bhanot stated, "Considering the urgency of the matter, the learned District Judge, Meerut shall ensure that all relevant details are provided to Shri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned amicus curiae promptly."

The denial of Titu's bail application underscores the ongoing challenges faced by marginalized individuals in accessing timely and adequate legal aid. The court's appointment of an amicus curiae reflects its commitment to ensuring justice is served, despite systemic shortcomings. This case highlights the need for systemic reforms to provide better legal support for marginalized sections of society.

 

Date of Decision: July 15, 2024

Titu VS State of U.P

 

Latest Legal News