Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal GST Officer Froze Business Accounts Without Any Legal Basis, Ignored Taxpayer for Three Months: Bombay High Court Imposes Personal Costs Weapon Recovered, But No Forensic Report, No Independent Witness — Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused

High Court of Allahabad Criticizes Systemic Failures in Legal Representation for Marginalized Sections

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Allahabad, presided over by Hon'ble Justice Ajay Bhanot, has denied the bail application of Titu, who has been incarcerated since August 2017. The court highlighted the applicant's prolonged absence before the trial court and the systemic failures in providing legal aid to marginalized sections of society.

Titu, the applicant, was nominated in a criminal case in 2005 but was not arrested until August 10, 2017. He belongs to a marginalized section of society and did not have the resources or legal aid to apply for bail earlier. This is his first bail application.

The court noted the applicant's failure to appear before the trial court for over a decade. Despite his arrest in 2017, no satisfactory explanation was provided for this extended absence. The bail application itself was poorly drafted, indicating inadequate legal assistance.

Justice Bhanot emphasized the systemic failures in providing legal aid to marginalized individuals. He remarked, "Prima facie, it is evident that the applicant has been without legal aid since his arrest and even at this stage, the drafting has been less than satisfactory. No assistance is forthcoming from the applicant's counsel."

To address these deficiencies, the court appointed Shri Rajiv Lochan Shukla as amicus curiae and directed the High Court Legal Services Committee to assist in filing an affidavit on behalf of the applicant. The learned District Judge of Meerut was instructed to provide all relevant details to the amicus curiae promptly.

Justice Bhanot stated, "Considering the urgency of the matter, the learned District Judge, Meerut shall ensure that all relevant details are provided to Shri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned amicus curiae promptly."

The denial of Titu's bail application underscores the ongoing challenges faced by marginalized individuals in accessing timely and adequate legal aid. The court's appointment of an amicus curiae reflects its commitment to ensuring justice is served, despite systemic shortcomings. This case highlights the need for systemic reforms to provide better legal support for marginalized sections of society.

 

Date of Decision: July 15, 2024

Titu VS State of U.P

 

Latest Legal News