Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 498A IPC | Vague Allegations Without Specific Overt Acts Against Relatives Cannot Sustain Prosecution: Kerala High Court Motor Accident Claims | Tribunal Must Adopt Standardised Notional Income Charts For Determining Loss Of Future Earnings: Karnataka High Court Suit On Dishonoured Cheque Is Based On Statutory Liability Under Negotiable Instruments Act And Not On Underlying Original Transaction: Kerala High Court State Cannot Re-Litigate Grounds Rejected In Earlier Final Judgment To Deny Employment: Allahabad High Court Orders Appointment of Librarians JJ Act | JJBs Cannot Simply 'Return' Child In Conflict With Law To Police Without Passing Placement Orders If Bail Not Granted: Andhra Pradesh High Court PMLA | Official Banking Transactions In Usual Course Of Business Cannot Be Construed As Proceeds Of Crime: Bombay High Court Section 41A CrPC | Serving Notice After Arrest Is Illegal, Police Cannot Simply Arrest To Ask Questions: Bombay High Court Fit-Out Possession Without Completion Certificate Is Not Valid Possession; Builder Cannot Charge Delayed Interest Or GST When Default Is On Its Part: Chandigarh State Commission Appellate Court Must Not Disturb Acquittal Unless Trial Court’s View Is Perverse Or Manifestly Illegal: Gujarat High Court Order 12 Rule 6 CPC | Landlord Divesting Ownership Via Pre-Suit Sale Deed Loses Locus Standi Under Section 109 TP Act; Summary Eviction Decree Impermissible: Delhi High Court Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked For Restoration Of Possession When Statutory Remedy Under Section 144 Exists: Calcutta High Court 'Mere Assertion Of Higher Rent By Landlord Cannot Oust DRC Act': Delhi High Court Sets Aside Eviction Decree, Remands Matter Back Arbitration Clause In Agreement No Safe Harbour For Criminal Breach Of Trust; Pre-Arrest Bail In Economic Offences An Exception: Allahabad High Court Order 7 Rule 10 CPC | Pecuniary Jurisdiction Cannot Be Determined Solely On Plaintiff's Oral Admission In Cross-Examination: Madras High Court Principle Of Parity Applies Even If Earlier Order Was Declared 'Not A Precedent': Orissa High Court Acquisition Lapses If Authority Inactive For Over 5 Years Excluding Stay; Bar On Subsequent Purchasers Inapplicable If Land Stood Released: Madhya Pradesh High Court Senior Citizens Act  | Summary Eviction Remedy Cannot Be Extended To Daughter-In-Law As She Is Neither 'Child' Nor 'Relative': Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 471 IPC | Mere Absence Of Direct Forgery Does Not Absolve Accused Of Using Forged Document As Genuine: Rajasthan High Court Criminal Proceedings Against Husband's Relatives Cannot Continue On Vague & Omnibus Allegations Without Specific Overt Acts: Telangana High Court Magistrate's Inability To Recall Order Does Not Preclude High Court From Restoring Cheque Bounce Complaint Dismissed In Default: Punjab & Haryana High Court

High Court of Allahabad Criticizes Systemic Failures in Legal Representation for Marginalized Sections

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Allahabad, presided over by Hon'ble Justice Ajay Bhanot, has denied the bail application of Titu, who has been incarcerated since August 2017. The court highlighted the applicant's prolonged absence before the trial court and the systemic failures in providing legal aid to marginalized sections of society.

Titu, the applicant, was nominated in a criminal case in 2005 but was not arrested until August 10, 2017. He belongs to a marginalized section of society and did not have the resources or legal aid to apply for bail earlier. This is his first bail application.

The court noted the applicant's failure to appear before the trial court for over a decade. Despite his arrest in 2017, no satisfactory explanation was provided for this extended absence. The bail application itself was poorly drafted, indicating inadequate legal assistance.

Justice Bhanot emphasized the systemic failures in providing legal aid to marginalized individuals. He remarked, "Prima facie, it is evident that the applicant has been without legal aid since his arrest and even at this stage, the drafting has been less than satisfactory. No assistance is forthcoming from the applicant's counsel."

To address these deficiencies, the court appointed Shri Rajiv Lochan Shukla as amicus curiae and directed the High Court Legal Services Committee to assist in filing an affidavit on behalf of the applicant. The learned District Judge of Meerut was instructed to provide all relevant details to the amicus curiae promptly.

Justice Bhanot stated, "Considering the urgency of the matter, the learned District Judge, Meerut shall ensure that all relevant details are provided to Shri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned amicus curiae promptly."

The denial of Titu's bail application underscores the ongoing challenges faced by marginalized individuals in accessing timely and adequate legal aid. The court's appointment of an amicus curiae reflects its commitment to ensuring justice is served, despite systemic shortcomings. This case highlights the need for systemic reforms to provide better legal support for marginalized sections of society.

 

Date of Decision: July 15, 2024

Titu VS State of U.P

 

Latest Legal News