A customer cannot be compelled to pay a service charge merely because it is written on a menu card: Delhi High Court affirms consumer’s right to choice Merely Because There Are Cash Rewards, It Does Not Mean The Employee Is Fit To Be Retained In Service: J&K & L High Court Blank Cheque Theory Rejected — Presumption Under Section 138 NI Act Stands Unrebutted In Absence Of Cogent Defence Persistent Neglect, Denial of Conjugal Rights, and Forced Spiritual Conformity Amounts to Mental Cruelty — Kerala High Court Upholds Divorce on Ground of Cruelty Such Approach Will Create a Barbaric Situation Wherein Innocent Persons Would Be Made Scapegoats: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criticizes Target-Based Anti-Drug Drive While Granting Bail Absconding Accused Cannot Seek Shelter Under Section 482 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Despite Procedural Irregularities - Deleted Images, Name on Parcel and Reverse Burden — Petitioner Must Explain Her Role — Calcutta High Court Declines Bail Under NDPS Act 13 Years, 7 Months, and 11 Days of Incarceration Without Conclusion of Trial Violates Article 21: Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Two Undertrials in Murder Case Unborn Child is Also a Dependent Entitled to Compensation under MV Act: Punjab and Haryana High Court Res Judicata | Competent Authority Has No Power to Review or Entertain Successive Deemed Conveyance Applications Without Resolving Prior Legal Disputes: Supreme Court Prima Facie Satisfaction Under Section 319 CrPC Is Not Conclusive Proof of Guilt, But Mere Probability Is Also Insufficient: Supreme Court Teachers Without Ph.D. Cannot Claim Higher Pay Scale and Re-designation as Associate Professors Under AICTE Norms: Supreme Court Wrong Quasi-Judicial Orders Without Extraneous Influence Cannot Invite Departmental Action: Supreme Court: Non-Compliance With Section 52-A NDPS Act and Standing Order No.1/89 Is Fatal to Prosecution: Supreme Court Acquits All Accused in Ganja Seizure Case Non-Examination of Eye-Witness Not Fatal to Motor Accident Claim: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reverses Tribunal’s Award Rejecting Compensation “Even a Criminal is Entitled to Dignity” : Supreme Court Slams Haryana Police for Violating Arnesh Kumar Guidelines; Orders Nationwide Circulation of Safeguards Against Illegal Arrests 125 CrPC | Mandatory Grant of Interest on Maintenance Cannot Be Overlooked:  Bombay High Court

Not interfere with the findings of fact recorded after appreciation of evidence merely because the High Court thought that another view would be a better view U/S 100 C.P.C - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Section 41 0f Punjab Court Act – Section 100 C.P.C - jurisdiction in second appeal is not to interfere with the findings of fact on the ground that findings are erroneous – findings of fact will also include the findings on the basis of documentary evidence - jurisdiction to interfere in the second appeal is only where there is an error in law or procedure and not merely an error on a question of fact.  

Section 100 C.P.C – Second Appeal - not interfere with the findings of fact recorded after appreciation of evidence merely because the High Court thought that another view would be a better view. High Court's findings – which are based entirely on the reappreciation of the record – and consequent interference with the concurrent findings of the lower courts, cannot be upheld - Judgement set aside - Appeal allowed 

September 29, 2021

AVTAR SINGH & ORS.  VERSUS  BIMLA DEVI & ORS. 

Similar News