(1)
THE STATE OF ODISHA …APPELLANT Vs.
NIRJHARINI PATNAIK @ MOHANTY & ANR. …RESPONDENTS D.D
26/04/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Origins and Investigation of Case – Forgery and Land Fraud – FIR lodged on 20.05.2005 alleging conspiracy in forgery to transfer government land illegally, leading to charges against the respondents under multiple IPC sections – Detailed investigation traced back to fraudulent documents and transactions undervaluing land significantly [Paras 2-3].
High Court Quashing Initial O...
(2)
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS ...PETITIONER Vs.
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS D.D
26/04/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.C. Jose v. Sivan Pillai and others, (1984) 2 SCC 656
Subramanian Swamy v. Election Commission of India (2013) 10 SCC 500
N. Chandrababu Naidu and Others v. Union of India and Another (2019) 15 SCC 377.
Nyaya Bhoomi and Another v. Election Commission of India Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1332/2018 order dated 22.11.2018 (SC)
Tech for All v. Election Commission of India order dated 21.05.2...
(3)
SHRIRAM MANOHAR BANDE …APPELLANT Vs.
UKTRANTI MANDAL & ORS. …RESPONDENTS D.D
25/04/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Resignation and Reinstatement – Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 – Challenge against wrongful termination following resignation withdrawal – Appellant contested the legitimacy of his termination after withdrawal of resignation; Tribunal found in favor of appellant, noting fabrication of documents by respondents; High Court reve...
(4)
SHRI MALLIKARJUN DEVASTHAN, SHELGI …APPELLANT Vs.
SUBHASH MALLIKARJUN BIRAJDAR AND OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) D.D
25/04/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Change Report Condonation – Authority and Procedure – Supreme Court analysis of authority and procedural requirements for accepting late Change Reports under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, with reference to specific case of Shri Mallikarjun Devasthan, Shelgi. Held: Change Reports were validly accepted despite delays due to sufficient cause shown for condonation of delays. High Co...
(5)
GLOBAL CREDIT CAPITAL LIMITED & ANR. …APPELLANTS Vs.
SACH MARKETING PVT. LTD. & ANR. …RESPONDENTS D.D
25/04/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Nature of Creditor Identification – Issue centers on whether entities providing security deposits with interest to a corporate debtor can be considered financial creditors or operational creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Financial Creditor Status – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Appeals challenging the NCLAT orders recognizing certain partie...
(6)
MOHD. AHSAN …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
25/04/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Alteration of Conviction – Section 302 to Section 304 Part I of IPC – Analysis of circumstances and evidences – Held: In the incident arising from a sudden quarrel without premeditation, where the appellant reacted in the heat of passion, the Supreme Court modifies the conviction from Section 302 to Section 304 Part I of IPC. The altercation at a Dhaba, leading to the death of th...
(7)
M/S MADURA COATS PRIVATE LIMITED …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND ANR. …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
25/04/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Excise Duty Adjudication – Civil Appeal on Tribunal's Remand Order – Civil Appeal against the High Court order which set aside the tribunal's decision and remanded the matter for fresh hearing – Supreme Court addresses compliance with tribunal's directives on providing specific documents to the appellant and subsequent adjudications, highlighting the need for adherenc...
(8)
MAYA GOPINATHAN …APPELLANT Vs.
ANOOP S.B. & ANR. …RESPONDENTS D.D
24/04/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Marriage and Misappropriation of Assets – Maya Gopinathan (Appellant) appeals against High Court’s partial reversal of Family Court’s judgment which had favored her claims of misappropriation of jewelry and a monetary gift by Anoop S.B. (First Respondent) and his late brother (Second Respondent) – Family Court had originally awarded compensation for 89 sovereigns of gold an...
(9)
SANJU RAJAN NAYAR … APPELLANT Vs.
JAYARAJ & ANR. … RESPONDENTS D.D
24/04/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Quashing of FIR – Insufficient Evidence Claims – High Court’s Decision Reversed – The High Court had quashed an FIR implicating Respondent No.1 for lack of direct evidence of bribery and monetary demand – The Supreme Court found this approach legally unsustainable, noting the premature dismissal of credible investigatory evidence including a pendrive indicating involv...