(1)
FORD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Appellant (s) Vs.
M/S. MEDICAL ELEBORATE CONCEPT PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Respondent(s) D.D
05/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Consumer Protection – Motor Vehicle Defect – Amicable Settlement – Appellant, a car manufacturer, challenges the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission upholding the State Commission’s decision – First respondent, a consumer, purchased a vehicle from the appellant’s authorized dealer and filed a complaint regarding various defects, includin...
(2)
HARI PRAKASH SHUKLA & ANR. … PETITIONER(S) Vs.
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. … RESPONDENT(S) D.D
05/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
I. Whether the relief granted in the Banwasi Sewa Ashram judgment is only applicable to SC/ST/other backward communities?
Para 16-24: The Banwasi Sewa Ashram judgment confers a right to be heard by a competent authority to all claimants, irrespective of their community. The right to possess the land should be enjoyed by those with a legitimate claim. Interpretation of the judgment in a narrow m...
(3)
RAHUL GANPATRAO SABLE …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
LAXMAN MARUTI JADHAV (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
05/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Motor Accident Compensation - Appeal against quantum of compensation - Appellant injured claimant assails the judgment of the High Court awarding additional compensation over and above the amount awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - Arguments raised regarding loss of income, uncertainties of life, deduction towards personal expenses, multiplier, attendant expenses, future medical expens...
(4)
Ramesh Chand … Appellant Vs.
Management of Delhi Transport Corporation … Respondent D.D
05/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Labour Law - Termination of employment - Back wages - Burden of proof - Appellant, a conductor employed by respondent, was removed from service after an inquiry found him guilty of misconduct - Labour Court ordered reinstatement but denied back wages - Appellant filed writ petition seeking back wages, which was dismissed by the High Court - Appellant appealed to the Supreme Court - Burden of proof...
(5)
S. NARAHARI & ORS. … APPELLANT(S) Vs.
S.R. KUMAR & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S) D.D
05/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Special Leave Petition (Civil) – Maintainability – Appeal against order passed in review – Whether a Special Leave Petition (Civil) can be filed against an order passed in review – Provisions of Order XLVII Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Code – Bar on filing Special Leave Petition against order passed in review – Lack of specific permission to file subsequent Spe...
(6)
State of U.P. … Appellant Vs.
Sonu Kushwaha … Respondent D.D
05/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
POCSO Act – Aggravated penetrative sexual assault – Conviction and sentence – Appellant-accused was prosecuted for offences under Sections 377 and 506 of IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act – Trial Court convicted appellant for all three offences and sentenced him accordingly – High Court modified conviction to penetrative sexual assault under Section 4 of the P...
(7)
Santhosh Maize & Industries Limited …APPELLANT Vs.
The State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. …RESPONDENTS D.D
04/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Classification and taxation of maize starch under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act - Appellant dealt in maize starch and claimed exemption based on an Exemption Notification - The Act was amended, and maize starch was moved to a different entry subject to a 4% tax rate - Commissioner issued a clarification stating maize starch was taxable - Appellant challenged the clarification and tax assess...
(8)
SUPRIYA JAIN … APPELLANT Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. … RESPONDENTS D.D
04/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Quashing of criminal proceedings - Jurisdiction of High Court under Section 482 of the CrPC - Principles to be considered - Exercise of power sparingly and with circumspection - Allegations must be patently absurd and inherently improbable for quashing – No meticulous examination of evidence at the stage of framing charges - Power to be used to prevent abuse of process and miscarriage of jus...
(9)
THE COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS AND ANOTHER … APPELLANT(S) Vs.
M/S RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. … RESPONDENT(S) D.D
04/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 – Limitation – Invocation of extended period of limitation – Suppression of facts – Bonafide belief – Interpretation of law – Held, the extended period of limitation can be invoked only in cases of deliberate non-disclosure aimed at evading duty – The assessee’s belief based on a view taken by the Tribunal ...