Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Trial Court Erred in Not Considering Chargesheet and Materials Provided by Investigating Officer – Discharge Order Set Aside – Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in the matter of Shiv Raj Singh vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors, has overturned the Trial Court’s decision to discharge the respondents in a case of alleged fraudulent share transfer and falsification of company records. This move highlights the High Court’s insistence on the proper consideration of chargesheets and investigative materials in judicial proceedings.

Background and Legal Point of Judgement: The revision petition was filed against the discharge of respondents in FIR No. 177/2013 under Sections 420/406/468/471/384/120B IPC. The petitioner, a Director of M/s Kempty Konstructions Private Limited, alleged fraudulent transfer of his shares and removal as director using forged documents.

The petitioner claimed his shares were transferred without his consent, and directorship removed using forged documents.

The case also involved contrasting findings before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

The Trial Court had failed to consider the chargesheet and other materials provided by the Investigating Officer.

Court Assessment and Detailed Observations:

On the Role of Petitioner and Respondents: The High Court noted that the Trial Court did not adequately consider the chargesheet and investigation materials detailing the alleged illegal transfer and directorship removal.

Findings of NCLT: The High Court acknowledged the NCLT's findings but emphasized the different materials before the criminal court and the distinct nature of civil and criminal proceedings.

On the Applicability of Judicial Precedents: The court discussed several case laws, highlighting the distinction between civil and criminal proceedings and the different standards of proof required.

Reliance on Investigating Officer's Materials: The High Court criticized the Trial Court for not adequately considering the chargesheet and investigation materials.

Decision: The Delhi High Court set aside the discharge of the respondents and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for a careful examination of the chargesheet and other investigation materials. The Trial Court is directed to give the parties an opportunity for representation.

Date of Decision: April 02, 2024

Shiv Raj Singh vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors

Latest Legal News