MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |    

Sheikh Shahjahan Cannot Remain on the Run: Calcutta High Court Criticizes Bengal Police Inaction in Sandeshkhali Incident

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Calcutta High Court has made crucial observations regarding the Sandeshkhali incident, focusing on the evasion of Sheikh Shahjahan, a local Trinamool Congress leader, and the imposed prohibitory orders in the area. Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam, while hearing a plea by BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari, underscored the urgency of addressing the grievances in Sandeshkhali, including the issue of land grabbing.

The case revolves around the inability of the Bengal police to arrest Sheikh Shahjahan, despite numerous allegations and a recent attack on Enforcement Directorate officials. Shahjahan, accused of corruption, land grab, and extortion, has evaded capture for over a month. The political tension in Sandeshkhali escalated when BJP leaders Suvendu Adhikari and Shankar Ghosh were initially prevented from visiting the area despite a court order.

Chief Justice Sivagnanam emphasized, "Sheikh Shahjahan cannot remain on the run," highlighting the state's responsibility in ensuring his surrender. The court sharply criticized the Bengal police for their inaction, questioning the state's apparent support for Shahjahan. Furthermore, the imposition of prohibitory orders in Sandeshkhali was scrutinized, with the Chief Justice likening it to the oppressive Covid lockdown, suggesting that it added to the locals' distress and stifled their voices.

The court allowed BJP leaders Suvendu Adhikari and Shankar Ghosh to visit Sandeshkhali, reinforcing the single-bench order. This decision marks a significant stance against the imposition of prohibitory orders and underscores the necessity for law enforcement to act impartially, particularly in politically sensitive situations.

 

Similar News