UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Sheikh Shahjahan Cannot Remain on the Run: Calcutta High Court Criticizes Bengal Police Inaction in Sandeshkhali Incident

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Calcutta High Court has made crucial observations regarding the Sandeshkhali incident, focusing on the evasion of Sheikh Shahjahan, a local Trinamool Congress leader, and the imposed prohibitory orders in the area. Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam, while hearing a plea by BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari, underscored the urgency of addressing the grievances in Sandeshkhali, including the issue of land grabbing.

The case revolves around the inability of the Bengal police to arrest Sheikh Shahjahan, despite numerous allegations and a recent attack on Enforcement Directorate officials. Shahjahan, accused of corruption, land grab, and extortion, has evaded capture for over a month. The political tension in Sandeshkhali escalated when BJP leaders Suvendu Adhikari and Shankar Ghosh were initially prevented from visiting the area despite a court order.

Chief Justice Sivagnanam emphasized, "Sheikh Shahjahan cannot remain on the run," highlighting the state's responsibility in ensuring his surrender. The court sharply criticized the Bengal police for their inaction, questioning the state's apparent support for Shahjahan. Furthermore, the imposition of prohibitory orders in Sandeshkhali was scrutinized, with the Chief Justice likening it to the oppressive Covid lockdown, suggesting that it added to the locals' distress and stifled their voices.

The court allowed BJP leaders Suvendu Adhikari and Shankar Ghosh to visit Sandeshkhali, reinforcing the single-bench order. This decision marks a significant stance against the imposition of prohibitory orders and underscores the necessity for law enforcement to act impartially, particularly in politically sensitive situations.

 

Latest Legal News