Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Sheikh Shahjahan Cannot Remain on the Run: Calcutta High Court Criticizes Bengal Police Inaction in Sandeshkhali Incident

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Calcutta High Court has made crucial observations regarding the Sandeshkhali incident, focusing on the evasion of Sheikh Shahjahan, a local Trinamool Congress leader, and the imposed prohibitory orders in the area. Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam, while hearing a plea by BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari, underscored the urgency of addressing the grievances in Sandeshkhali, including the issue of land grabbing.

The case revolves around the inability of the Bengal police to arrest Sheikh Shahjahan, despite numerous allegations and a recent attack on Enforcement Directorate officials. Shahjahan, accused of corruption, land grab, and extortion, has evaded capture for over a month. The political tension in Sandeshkhali escalated when BJP leaders Suvendu Adhikari and Shankar Ghosh were initially prevented from visiting the area despite a court order.

Chief Justice Sivagnanam emphasized, "Sheikh Shahjahan cannot remain on the run," highlighting the state's responsibility in ensuring his surrender. The court sharply criticized the Bengal police for their inaction, questioning the state's apparent support for Shahjahan. Furthermore, the imposition of prohibitory orders in Sandeshkhali was scrutinized, with the Chief Justice likening it to the oppressive Covid lockdown, suggesting that it added to the locals' distress and stifled their voices.

The court allowed BJP leaders Suvendu Adhikari and Shankar Ghosh to visit Sandeshkhali, reinforcing the single-bench order. This decision marks a significant stance against the imposition of prohibitory orders and underscores the necessity for law enforcement to act impartially, particularly in politically sensitive situations.

 

Latest Legal News