Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Sheikh Shahjahan Cannot Remain on the Run: Calcutta High Court Criticizes Bengal Police Inaction in Sandeshkhali Incident

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Calcutta High Court has made crucial observations regarding the Sandeshkhali incident, focusing on the evasion of Sheikh Shahjahan, a local Trinamool Congress leader, and the imposed prohibitory orders in the area. Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam, while hearing a plea by BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari, underscored the urgency of addressing the grievances in Sandeshkhali, including the issue of land grabbing.

The case revolves around the inability of the Bengal police to arrest Sheikh Shahjahan, despite numerous allegations and a recent attack on Enforcement Directorate officials. Shahjahan, accused of corruption, land grab, and extortion, has evaded capture for over a month. The political tension in Sandeshkhali escalated when BJP leaders Suvendu Adhikari and Shankar Ghosh were initially prevented from visiting the area despite a court order.

Chief Justice Sivagnanam emphasized, "Sheikh Shahjahan cannot remain on the run," highlighting the state's responsibility in ensuring his surrender. The court sharply criticized the Bengal police for their inaction, questioning the state's apparent support for Shahjahan. Furthermore, the imposition of prohibitory orders in Sandeshkhali was scrutinized, with the Chief Justice likening it to the oppressive Covid lockdown, suggesting that it added to the locals' distress and stifled their voices.

The court allowed BJP leaders Suvendu Adhikari and Shankar Ghosh to visit Sandeshkhali, reinforcing the single-bench order. This decision marks a significant stance against the imposition of prohibitory orders and underscores the necessity for law enforcement to act impartially, particularly in politically sensitive situations.

 

Latest Legal News