Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Sheikh Shahjahan Cannot Remain on the Run: Calcutta High Court Criticizes Bengal Police Inaction in Sandeshkhali Incident

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Calcutta High Court has made crucial observations regarding the Sandeshkhali incident, focusing on the evasion of Sheikh Shahjahan, a local Trinamool Congress leader, and the imposed prohibitory orders in the area. Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam, while hearing a plea by BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari, underscored the urgency of addressing the grievances in Sandeshkhali, including the issue of land grabbing.

The case revolves around the inability of the Bengal police to arrest Sheikh Shahjahan, despite numerous allegations and a recent attack on Enforcement Directorate officials. Shahjahan, accused of corruption, land grab, and extortion, has evaded capture for over a month. The political tension in Sandeshkhali escalated when BJP leaders Suvendu Adhikari and Shankar Ghosh were initially prevented from visiting the area despite a court order.

Chief Justice Sivagnanam emphasized, "Sheikh Shahjahan cannot remain on the run," highlighting the state's responsibility in ensuring his surrender. The court sharply criticized the Bengal police for their inaction, questioning the state's apparent support for Shahjahan. Furthermore, the imposition of prohibitory orders in Sandeshkhali was scrutinized, with the Chief Justice likening it to the oppressive Covid lockdown, suggesting that it added to the locals' distress and stifled their voices.

The court allowed BJP leaders Suvendu Adhikari and Shankar Ghosh to visit Sandeshkhali, reinforcing the single-bench order. This decision marks a significant stance against the imposition of prohibitory orders and underscores the necessity for law enforcement to act impartially, particularly in politically sensitive situations.

 

Latest Legal News