Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Punjab and Haryana High Court Declares Termination  of the Lecturer  Without show cause notice Illegal, Orders Reinstatement

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


0n 5 July 2023, In a recent ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court declared the termination of services of a senior lecturer at Ansal Institute of Technology as illegal, ordering his immediate reinstatement. The court also directed the management to pay all notional benefits, including arrears of salary. The judgment, delivered by Justice Jaishree Thakur, emphasized the violation of Service Rules and Section 22 of the Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Manoj Kumar Verma, had filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of the order dismissing his appeal against the termination and reinstatement with continuity of service. The court held that the termination was illegal as it failed to comply with the Service Rules and Section 22, which required a three-month notice or a show cause notice before termination.

Justice Jaishree Thakur, in her judgment, stated, “The termination of the petitioner’s services without issuing a show cause notice and solely relying on the appointment letter, which permits termination by giving three months’ notice, is illegal and deserves to be set aside.”

The court also rejected the respondents’ argument that the writ petition was not maintainable due to a previous civil suit filed by the petitioner. The civil suit was withdrawn with liberty to approach the Educational Tribunal, and the court held that the principle of res judicata did not apply.

“The principle of res judicata does not bar the writ petition as the civil suit was not decided on any issue,” Justice Jaishree Thakur stated.

The judgment further highlighted that the management had violated the Service Rules by terminating the petitioner’s services with only one month’s notice instead of the required three months. The court directed the management to reinstate the petitioner immediately, along with all notional benefits.

This judgment holds significance as it reaffirms the importance of following due process and ensuring the protection of employees’ rights. It serves as a reminder to educational institutions to adhere to the prescribed rules and regulations governing the termination of services.

Date of Decision: 5th July 2023.

Manoj Kumar Verma vs Management Board of Ansal Institute of Technology & others

Latest Legal News