Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

No Motive or Reason Can Be Assigned to Merely a Domestic Help (Servant) – Delhi HC Grants Bail in Kidnapping and Attempted Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement, the Delhi High Court granted bail to Vicky Anand, a domestic helper, in a complex case involving charges of kidnapping, illegal confinement, attempted murder, and criminal conspiracy. Justice Amit Mahajan, presiding over the case, observed that no clear motive or reason could be assigned to the applicant, who was merely a domestic helper in the residence of the co-accused persons.

The bail application hinged on the interpretation of Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in light of the allegations made under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 365, 367, 368, 307, 506, 34, and 120B. A significant point of the judgement was the treatment of evidence by a hostile witness in the light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Mrinal Das v. State of Tripura.

The case stemmed from a complaint filed by the victim, who alleged that after eloping and marrying a woman against her family’s wishes, both were kidnapped, and he was grievously injured by the woman’s family. However, during the trial, the victim turned hostile, denying his earlier statements and alleging that the police obtained his signature on blank papers.

Justice Mahajan meticulously assessed the evidence and circumstances, especially highlighting the victim’s hostile testimony. The court observed that the applicant was not initially named in the FIR or the initial chargesheet and was implicated only in the supplementary chargesheet without a clear motive. Considering the absence of the applicant’s name in initial stages, the lack of criminal antecedents, and the victim turning hostile, the court found it reasonable to grant bail.

Vicky Anand was granted bail on a personal bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties of the same amount. Conditions included a restriction on leaving the National Capital Region without permission, regular appearance in court, and the requirement to keep his mobile phone s[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Del-19-Feb-24-Vicky-Bail.pdf"]witched on and responsive to law enforcement.

 Date of Decision: 19th February 2024

Vicky Anand Vs. State of NCT of Delhi

Latest Legal News