Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Necessity of Swift Action Against Habitual Offenders - Detention Order Upheld Despite Delay in Execution: High Court of Delhi Affirms Preventive Detention  under PITNDPS Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Delhi upheld the preventive detention order against Naushad Ali under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (PITNDPS Act), rejecting his petition challenging the order.

The court focused on the legality of the preventive detention order issued under Section 3(1) of the PITNDPS Act. Despite the delay in executing the detention order, the court held that the detention was justified based on substantial evidence against Ali for trafficking narcotics and psychotropic substances.

Naushad Ali, proprietor of Shaad Medical Store and Kenway Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., was detained under the PITNDPS Act for his involvement in illicit drug trafficking. Ali challenged the detention order dated February 25, 2022, citing delays in execution and alleged violations of procedural norms.

The court meticulously examined the case, noting, “The grievous nature and gravity of offences committed by Naushad Ali in a well-planned manner clearly establishes his continued propensity and inclination to engage in such acts of prejudicial activities.” The court observed that Ali’s evasion from law enforcement contributed to the delay in executing the detention order and did not vitiate the purpose of the detention laws.

The court also noted that Ali was ”rovi’ed with the detention order and grounds while in custody, offering him a fair opportunity to challenge the detention. The representation to the Advisory Board was recognized as adequate for ensuring his rights under Article 22 of the Constitution.

The court concluded that the detention order was necessary and justified based on the evidence and Ali’s conduct. The petition and the pending application were dismissed, affirming the need to immobilize Ali to prevent him from engaging in illicit drug trafficking.

Date of Decision: February 20, 2024.

Naushad Ali Through Perokar Sahajad Ali vs. UOI & ORS.

 

Latest Legal News