Father’s Obligation To Maintain Minor Child Under Section 125 CrPC Is Absolute Even If Mother Is Also Earning: Uttarakhand High Court Allahabad High Court Rejects Bail Of Man Who Killed Bystander While Aiming At Another; Invokes 'Doctrine Of Transfer Of Malice' Foreign Summary Judgment Passed After Refusing Leave To Defend Is Not 'On Merits' Under Section 13 CPC: Supreme Court Constitutional Safeguards Don’t End At Prison Gates: Supreme Court Extends Mandatory Disability Rights Directions To All States & UTs Courts Not Bound By Low Govt Rates For Prosthetic Limbs; Claimants Entitled To Choose Private Centres For 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court Probate Obtained By Suppressing Property Transfers & Not Citing Interested Parties Must Be Revoked: Supreme Court DNA Test To Prove Adultery Cannot Be Ordered Without Rebutting Presumption Of Child's Legitimacy: Uttarakhand High Court Employee Cannot Be Denied Pension On Higher Wages Due To Employer's Failure To Produce Records: Bombay High Court Section 15 HSA: Brother Has No Claim To Sister’s Estate Over Husband’s Heirs; Law Not Declared Unconstitutional: Bombay High Court Possession Of Stolen Jewellery & Blood-Stained Clothes Soon After Murder Points To Guilt: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction State Cannot Apply Draft Grading Rules To SSLC Exams Already Conducted: Karnataka High Court Dismisses Review Petition Sale Agreement Signed By Some Family Members Not Binding On Others Holding Independent Shares Under Partition Decree: Madras High Court Unauthorized Absence For Over Three Years Cannot Be Treated As Minor Misconduct: Bombay High Court Upholds Removal Of Insurance Employee Delay In Releasing Pension Is Deprivation Of Right To Life & Liberty Under Articles 14 & 21: Delhi High Court YouTuber Advocate Guilty Of Criminal Contempt For Posting Scandalous Banners Targeting Named Judicial Officers: Delhi High Court Official Car Of Judicial Officer Not 'Means Of Public Transportation' Under PDPP Act; Kerala High Court Quashes Case Against Bus Driver Tenant Evicted For Rent Default Despite Claims Of Adjustment Toward Municipal Taxes; Rebuilding Ground Rejected For Want Of Genuine Need: Calcutta High Court Common Intention Can Be Formed On Spot Through Exhortation & Conduct; Allahabad High Court Upholds Conviction In 1984 Murder Case Single 'Sterling' Witness Testimony Sufficient For Conviction; Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Opinion: Supreme Court Welfare State Cannot Undo Decades-Old Land Transactions To Dispossess Innocent Homeowners: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders Closure Of School Occupying Secured Asset After Persistent SARFAESI Default & Breach Of Court Undertakings State Apathy For 22 Years: Supreme Court Directs Reallocation Of Employee To Uttarakhand Cadre, Imposes Rs 1 Lakh Cost On UP Govt Civil Court Has No Jurisdiction To Adjudicate Validity Of Municipal Limits; It Is A Legislative Function: Supreme Court Delhi Rent Control Act Inapplicable To Premises Held Under Government Grant; Section 3 GG Act Overrides General Laws: Supreme Court

Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation

07 December 2025 11:50 AM

By: Admin


“A claim based on strict liability made by resorting to a constitutional remedy... is distinct from, and in addition to the remedy in private law for damages for tort.”— In a seminal ruling the Gauhati High Court, comprising Justice Kardak Ete, ordered the State of Assam to pay compensation to seven victims who lost their eyesight following botched cataract surgeries at a Government Civil Hospital.

The petitioners, belonging to economically weaker sections, underwent cataract surgeries at B.P. Civil Hospital, Nagaon, between March 7 and March 10, 2017, under the National Programme for Control of Blindness (NPCB). Post-surgery, they developed severe irritation and complications. Upon being referred to Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Guwahati, it was discovered that the surgeries were improperly conducted, necessitating the removal of the affected eyes to prevent further infection.

The Enquiry and State’s Admission

An enquiry report submitted by the Director of Health Services revealed that out of 41 cases operated, 13 developed severe complications. The report highlighted deficiencies in the hospital's infrastructure, specifically the Eye Operation Theatre, recommending its closure until renovation.

While the report did not explicitly pin "negligence" on a specific doctor, it acknowledged the institutional failure. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, fairly admitted liability and proposed a compensation amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- per victim.

Public Law Remedy

Justice Ete invoked Article 21 of the Constitution, citing the Supreme Court’s landmark rulings in Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity (1996) and Nilabati Behera (1993). The Court emphasized that when fundamental rights are violated by the State or its instrumentalities—even through medical negligence in a welfare scheme—the Constitutional Courts have the power to award monetary compensation as a public law remedy. This is independent of any private tort claim.

Acknowledging the State's benevolent stance to pay without contesting the negligence claim further, the Court directed the State of Assam to pay Rs. 4,00,000/- (Four Lakhs) to each of the seven petitioners (or their legal heirs) within six weeks. The Court clarified that this relief extends to all similarly placed victims of this incident, irrespective of whether they approached the Court.

Date of Decision: 27th November, 2025

Latest Legal News