Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Judicial Mind Must Prevail, Not Rote Precedent: Calcutta High Court Reinstates Need for Fair Hearing in Kutty’s Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court has underscored the fundamental principle of fair hearing in legal proceedings. The Court, led by Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul), allowed Criminal Revision (CRR 2496 of 2022) filed by Sujay Kutty against the State of West Bengal, setting aside the orders of the lower courts which were passed without proper consideration of the merits of the case.

Brief on Legal Point: The Court emphasized the paramountcy of the petitioner’s right to a fair hearing, stating that dismissal of the petitioner’s revision solely based on the High Court’s earlier order (wherein the petitioner was not a party) amounted to a violation of the fundamental principles of hearing and natural justice.

Facts and Issues: Sujay Kutty was implicated under Sections 354A(1)(iv)/34 IPC, following allegations by an actress. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, had taken cognizance and issued process against Kutty without proper application of judicial mind, leading to Kutty filing a revision petition. The Sessions Judge, Alipore, dismissed this petition, relying on a High Court order in a related but separate case where Kutty was not a party. This dismissal forms the crux of the legal challenge in the present case.

Violation of Fair Hearing: The Court noted, “The petitioner has suffered an abuse of the process of the Court/law as the Learned Sessions Judge without considering the petitioner’s case on merit dismissed his application only on the basis of the High Court’s order”.

Inadvertence in High Court’s Earlier Order: The High Court acknowledged that the phrase “all the accused” in its earlier order was inadvertently used, causing prejudicial impact on the petitioner.

Restoration of Petition: The High Court directed that Criminal Motion No. 222 of 2016 be restored and heard afresh by the Sessions Judge, Alipore, ensuring a fair and proper hearing for both sides.

Decision: The Calcutta High Court set aside the order of the Sessions Judge, thereby restoring the matter for proper hearing and disposal in accordance with the law. It directed the Sessions Court to act as per the given instructions within two months.

Date of Decision: 10 April 2024.

Sujay Kutty Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr.

 

Latest Legal News