Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

In the Realm of Tragedy, No Money Can Compensate the Loss of a Child: High Court Upholds ₹8 Lakh Compensation for Deceased Minor

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a poignant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed an appeal by United India Insurance Company Limited against the award of ₹8,00,000/- compensation for the death of a minor in a tragic road accident. The court, presided over by Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Ritu Tagore, delivered a significant verdict, affirming the notional income of the deceased minor at ₹50,000/- per annum, while underscoring the inexpressible loss of a child.

The pivotal legal issue revolved around the appropriate assessment of notional income and compensation for the death of Manvi, a 1.5-year-old child, killed in a road mishap due to the rash and negligent driving of the respondent. The tribunal had previously awarded compensation considering a notional income of ₹50,000/- per annum for the deceased, employing a multiplier of 15. The appellant, an insurance company, sought a reduction in the compensation amount, proposing a lower notional income of ₹25,000/-.

Manvi, while playing in the street, was tragically crushed under a vehicle, driven by the respondent in a reckless manner, leading to her untimely demise. The father of the deceased filed an FIR under Sections 279 and 304-A of the IPC. The insurance company contested the award, alleging policy violation and disputing the notional income assessed for the minor.

The court meticulously dissected the arguments, citing precedents such as Meena Devi vs. Nunu Chand Mahto and Kishan Gopal vs. Lala, to affirm the tribunal’s decision. The judgment poignantly highlighted:

The Incalculable Loss: Justice Tagore observed, “Losing a child in an accident is an unfathomable tragedy for parents,” emphasizing the immeasurable emotional impact and the irreversible void left by such a loss.

Assessment of Notional Income: Considering the socio-economic background of the claimants and the inflationary trends, the Tribunal’s assessment of ₹50,000/- as notional income was deemed appropriate.

Compensation as Solace: The compensation was recognized as a means to provide solace, albeit limited, for the lost potential happiness and support the child would have offered in the future.

The High Court, hence, dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal’s assessment and award of compensation. The court concluded that the quantum of compensation granted was just and appropriate under the tragic circumstances.

Date of Decision: April 3, 2024

United India Insurance Company Limited vs Parmod Saini and Others

Similar News