Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Higher Qualification No Ground for Dismissal: Kerala HC Sets Aside Disciplinary Proceedings Against Bank Employee for Possessing SSLC Qualification

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Kerala, in a significant judgment, has quashed the disciplinary proceedings against a bank employee, T.D. Sreejakumari, who was dismissed from service for possessing higher educational qualifications than required for her post.

The court highlighted the critical issue of whether possessing higher educational qualifications can be a ground for dismissal from service. It addressed the principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings, especially the employee’s right to respond to an enquiry report before the disciplinary authority reaches a conclusion.

T.D. Sreejakumari, a Full-Time House Keeper cum Peon at Union Bank of India, faced dismissal for allegedly possessing SSLC qualification instead of the required 7th standard. The bank charged her with submitting a fraudulent certificate and making false statements. Sreejakumari challenged her dismissal, claiming a violation of natural justice and disproportionate disciplinary action.

Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan, presiding over the case, observed, “In some cases, higher qualification itself is a disqualification for getting appointment in certain posts.” The court found that the disciplinary proceedings against Sreejakumari were initiated without giving her a chance to respond to the enquiry report, a violation of natural justice principles established in the landmark judgment of Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad v. B. Karunakar.

The judgment stated, “This is illegal and against the principle laid down by the Apex Court in ECIL’s case (supra).” The court also noted the disproportionate nature of the disciplinary action and directed the respondents to re-evaluate the necessity and appropriateness of continuing the disciplinary proceedings.

The court quashed the disciplinary proceedings against Sreejakumari, directing the respondents to reconsider the proceedings in compliance with natural justice principles and specific circumstances of the case.

 Date of Decision: February 14, 2024

T.D. Sreejakumari vs Union Bank of India & Ors.

Latest Legal News