Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Failure to Adhere to Statutory Procedures in Property Tax Valuation Leads to Miscarriage of Justice: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Tribunal’s Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement delivered by The Hon’ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas of the High Court at Calcutta, the Court has overturned the order of the Municipal Assessment Tribunal pertaining to the annual valuation of property for municipal taxation. The case, titled The Kolkata Municipal Corporation Versus Sri Susanta Das, addressed crucial issues under the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 19’0, and the Calcutta Municipal Corporation (Taxation) Rules, 1987.

Brief on the Legal Point: The revisional application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the order of the Municipal Assessment Tribunal regarding the annual valuation of premises no. 99A, Humayun Kabir Sarani, Kolkata. The Tribunal had modified the valuation determined by the Hearing Officer of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation, leading to the present legal dispute.

Facts and Issues: The issue arose from a disagreement over the annual valuation of a property for municipal taxation. The opposite party, a flat owner, had challenged the initial valuation, leading to a reduction by the Hearing Officer. However, this valuation was further modified by the Tribunal, prompting the current litigation.

Jurisdiction and Procedure: The Court observed that the Tribunal failed to provide a reasoned justification for altering the Hearing Officer’s order, thus misapplying its jurisdiction and leading to a miscarriage of justice.

Statutory Obligations: The Tribunal’s decision was critiqued for not adhering to mandatory statutory procedures under the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act and the Calcutta Municipal Corporation (Taxation) Rules.

Reliance on Past Judgments: The Tribunal’s reliance on past judgments without relevance to the current case was deemed inappropriate.

Reasoning and Documentation: The Court highlighted the Tribunal’s failure to record reasons for its decision and its neglect in following procedures laid down in the Act and the Rules.

Decision: The High Court set aside the impugned order of the Municipal Assessment Tribunal and directed a fresh adjudication in strict compliance with the relevant provisions of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, and the Calcutta Municipal Corporation (Taxation) Rules, 1987.

Date of Decision: 10th April 2024

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation Versus Sri Susanta Das

Latest Legal News