Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Failure to Adhere to Statutory Procedures in Property Tax Valuation Leads to Miscarriage of Justice: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Tribunal’s Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement delivered by The Hon’ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas of the High Court at Calcutta, the Court has overturned the order of the Municipal Assessment Tribunal pertaining to the annual valuation of property for municipal taxation. The case, titled The Kolkata Municipal Corporation Versus Sri Susanta Das, addressed crucial issues under the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 19’0, and the Calcutta Municipal Corporation (Taxation) Rules, 1987.

Brief on the Legal Point: The revisional application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the order of the Municipal Assessment Tribunal regarding the annual valuation of premises no. 99A, Humayun Kabir Sarani, Kolkata. The Tribunal had modified the valuation determined by the Hearing Officer of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation, leading to the present legal dispute.

Facts and Issues: The issue arose from a disagreement over the annual valuation of a property for municipal taxation. The opposite party, a flat owner, had challenged the initial valuation, leading to a reduction by the Hearing Officer. However, this valuation was further modified by the Tribunal, prompting the current litigation.

Jurisdiction and Procedure: The Court observed that the Tribunal failed to provide a reasoned justification for altering the Hearing Officer’s order, thus misapplying its jurisdiction and leading to a miscarriage of justice.

Statutory Obligations: The Tribunal’s decision was critiqued for not adhering to mandatory statutory procedures under the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act and the Calcutta Municipal Corporation (Taxation) Rules.

Reliance on Past Judgments: The Tribunal’s reliance on past judgments without relevance to the current case was deemed inappropriate.

Reasoning and Documentation: The Court highlighted the Tribunal’s failure to record reasons for its decision and its neglect in following procedures laid down in the Act and the Rules.

Decision: The High Court set aside the impugned order of the Municipal Assessment Tribunal and directed a fresh adjudication in strict compliance with the relevant provisions of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, and the Calcutta Municipal Corporation (Taxation) Rules, 1987.

Date of Decision: 10th April 2024

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation Versus Sri Susanta Das

Latest Legal News