Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Every Child, Irrespective of Economic Strata, Has Right to Aspire for Education in Best of Schools: Delhi HC Upholds RTE Act Provisions for EWS/DG Students’ Admission

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has reaffirmed the rights of children from Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) and Disadvantaged Groups (DG) to receive education in private unaided schools under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The Court underscored the importance of equitable educational opportunities, stating, “Every child, irrespective of the economic strata to which she or he belongs, has a right to aspire to be educated in the best of schools.”

The judgment dealt with the admission of EWS/DG children to private unaided schools. It centered around the interpretation and application of the RTE Act, specifically regarding the autonomy of schools and the educational rights of EWS/DG children.

Petitioners Jai, Pawan Kumar, and Tejas Nath, through their respective fathers, sought admission to KG/Pre-primary and Nursery/Pre-school classes in a private unaided school. The school argued for a reduction in EWS/DG seats, citing its inability to fill general category seats. The core issue was the balancing of the school's autonomy against the educational rights of EWS/DG children.

Balancing Autonomy and Rights: The Court acknowledged the competing interests between the autonomy of unaided schools and the educational rights of EWS/DG children. It emphasized that schools are bound by DOE directives unless specific exemptions are granted.

Doctrine of Carrying Forward Unfilled Seats: The Court affirmed the principle that unfilled EWS/DG seats can be carried forward to subsequent academic years. It mandated the respondent school to admit EWS/DG students as per DOE’s allocation.

Compliance with Statutory and Regulatory Provisions: The Court held the school accountable for complying with RTE Act provisions and DOE guidelines, thus ensuring equitable access to education for EWS/DG children.

Decision: The High Court directed the respondent school to regularize the admission of the petitioners as per DOE’s allocation under the RTE Act. The judgment reinforced the commitment to providing quality education to children from economically weaker sections and disadvantaged groups.

Date of Decision: April 8, 2024.

ROHIT KUMAR VS DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR

Latest Legal News