Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Every Child, Irrespective of Economic Strata, Has Right to Aspire for Education in Best of Schools: Delhi HC Upholds RTE Act Provisions for EWS/DG Students’ Admission

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has reaffirmed the rights of children from Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) and Disadvantaged Groups (DG) to receive education in private unaided schools under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The Court underscored the importance of equitable educational opportunities, stating, “Every child, irrespective of the economic strata to which she or he belongs, has a right to aspire to be educated in the best of schools.”

The judgment dealt with the admission of EWS/DG children to private unaided schools. It centered around the interpretation and application of the RTE Act, specifically regarding the autonomy of schools and the educational rights of EWS/DG children.

Petitioners Jai, Pawan Kumar, and Tejas Nath, through their respective fathers, sought admission to KG/Pre-primary and Nursery/Pre-school classes in a private unaided school. The school argued for a reduction in EWS/DG seats, citing its inability to fill general category seats. The core issue was the balancing of the school's autonomy against the educational rights of EWS/DG children.

Balancing Autonomy and Rights: The Court acknowledged the competing interests between the autonomy of unaided schools and the educational rights of EWS/DG children. It emphasized that schools are bound by DOE directives unless specific exemptions are granted.

Doctrine of Carrying Forward Unfilled Seats: The Court affirmed the principle that unfilled EWS/DG seats can be carried forward to subsequent academic years. It mandated the respondent school to admit EWS/DG students as per DOE’s allocation.

Compliance with Statutory and Regulatory Provisions: The Court held the school accountable for complying with RTE Act provisions and DOE guidelines, thus ensuring equitable access to education for EWS/DG children.

Decision: The High Court directed the respondent school to regularize the admission of the petitioners as per DOE’s allocation under the RTE Act. The judgment reinforced the commitment to providing quality education to children from economically weaker sections and disadvantaged groups.

Date of Decision: April 8, 2024.

ROHIT KUMAR VS DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR

Similar News