TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Every Child, Irrespective of Economic Strata, Has Right to Aspire for Education in Best of Schools: Delhi HC Upholds RTE Act Provisions for EWS/DG Students’ Admission

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has reaffirmed the rights of children from Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) and Disadvantaged Groups (DG) to receive education in private unaided schools under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The Court underscored the importance of equitable educational opportunities, stating, “Every child, irrespective of the economic strata to which she or he belongs, has a right to aspire to be educated in the best of schools.”

The judgment dealt with the admission of EWS/DG children to private unaided schools. It centered around the interpretation and application of the RTE Act, specifically regarding the autonomy of schools and the educational rights of EWS/DG children.

Petitioners Jai, Pawan Kumar, and Tejas Nath, through their respective fathers, sought admission to KG/Pre-primary and Nursery/Pre-school classes in a private unaided school. The school argued for a reduction in EWS/DG seats, citing its inability to fill general category seats. The core issue was the balancing of the school's autonomy against the educational rights of EWS/DG children.

Balancing Autonomy and Rights: The Court acknowledged the competing interests between the autonomy of unaided schools and the educational rights of EWS/DG children. It emphasized that schools are bound by DOE directives unless specific exemptions are granted.

Doctrine of Carrying Forward Unfilled Seats: The Court affirmed the principle that unfilled EWS/DG seats can be carried forward to subsequent academic years. It mandated the respondent school to admit EWS/DG students as per DOE’s allocation.

Compliance with Statutory and Regulatory Provisions: The Court held the school accountable for complying with RTE Act provisions and DOE guidelines, thus ensuring equitable access to education for EWS/DG children.

Decision: The High Court directed the respondent school to regularize the admission of the petitioners as per DOE’s allocation under the RTE Act. The judgment reinforced the commitment to providing quality education to children from economically weaker sections and disadvantaged groups.

Date of Decision: April 8, 2024.

ROHIT KUMAR VS DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR

Latest Legal News