Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Every Child, Irrespective of Economic Strata, Has Right to Aspire for Education in Best of Schools: Delhi HC Upholds RTE Act Provisions for EWS/DG Students’ Admission

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has reaffirmed the rights of children from Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) and Disadvantaged Groups (DG) to receive education in private unaided schools under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The Court underscored the importance of equitable educational opportunities, stating, “Every child, irrespective of the economic strata to which she or he belongs, has a right to aspire to be educated in the best of schools.”

The judgment dealt with the admission of EWS/DG children to private unaided schools. It centered around the interpretation and application of the RTE Act, specifically regarding the autonomy of schools and the educational rights of EWS/DG children.

Petitioners Jai, Pawan Kumar, and Tejas Nath, through their respective fathers, sought admission to KG/Pre-primary and Nursery/Pre-school classes in a private unaided school. The school argued for a reduction in EWS/DG seats, citing its inability to fill general category seats. The core issue was the balancing of the school's autonomy against the educational rights of EWS/DG children.

Balancing Autonomy and Rights: The Court acknowledged the competing interests between the autonomy of unaided schools and the educational rights of EWS/DG children. It emphasized that schools are bound by DOE directives unless specific exemptions are granted.

Doctrine of Carrying Forward Unfilled Seats: The Court affirmed the principle that unfilled EWS/DG seats can be carried forward to subsequent academic years. It mandated the respondent school to admit EWS/DG students as per DOE’s allocation.

Compliance with Statutory and Regulatory Provisions: The Court held the school accountable for complying with RTE Act provisions and DOE guidelines, thus ensuring equitable access to education for EWS/DG children.

Decision: The High Court directed the respondent school to regularize the admission of the petitioners as per DOE’s allocation under the RTE Act. The judgment reinforced the commitment to providing quality education to children from economically weaker sections and disadvantaged groups.

Date of Decision: April 8, 2024.

ROHIT KUMAR VS DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR

Latest Legal News