Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Common Intention in Crime Inseparable, Bail Denied in Murder Case: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a recent ruling on February 16, 2024, dismissed a bail application underlining the principle of common intention under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in a case involving a homicidal death. The case, presided over by Hon’ble Ms. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, highlights the significance of collective responsibility in crimes involving multiple accused.

The case (BAIL APPLN. 3733/2023) revolves around the FIR No. 709/2020, registered for an offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the IPC. The petitioner, Deepak, sought regular bail for his involvement in a fatal stabbing incident reported on July 11, 2020. The prosecution’s case, based on eyewitness accounts, including that of the deceased’s sister, Smt. Deepmala, depicted a grisly scene where the victim was allegedly stabbed by co-accused Saif Ali and others, including the petitioner.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma meticulously analyzed the material on record, notably focusing on the concept of ‘common intention’. The Court observed, “when a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.” The Court found the petitioner’s argument, claiming he did not cause the fatal Injury, to be without merit. It was noted that the petitioner was part of the group that collectively inflicted injuries leading to the victim’s death.

The Court also considered the testimonies of PW-1 (Deepmala) and PW-3 (the mother of the deceased), who supported the prosecution’s case and mentioned threats from the accused. The gravity of the offence and the impact on the victim’s family were pivotal in the Court’s decision to deny bail.

Given the severity of the crime and the principle of common intention, the Court denied regular bail to the petitioner, Deepak, stating, “the gravity of the offence is the basis of deciding as to whether the bail can be granted to an accused or not.” The Court emphasized the seriousness of the offence, which could potentially lead to life imprisonment or a death sentence upon conviction.

Date of Decision:  16.02.2024

DEEPAK VS STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI

 

Latest Legal News