Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Appellant Cannot Be Permitted To Now Place On Record The Said Documents Once He Did Not Even Bother To File A Written Statement Of Defence: PH High Court Dismisses Application in Arbitration Dispute Over Rice Mill Lease

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Thursday confirmed the dismissal of an appeal by M/s Gaurav Rice Industries, which contested an arbitral award favoring The Haryana State Coop. Supply and Marketing Fed. Limited (HAFED) regarding a breach of a rice mill lease agreement.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The judgment centered on the appellant’s attempt to challenge an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following their failure to fulfill the terms of a lease agreement.

Facts and Issues: The dispute originated from a lease agreement where the appellants failed to comply with payment and other obligations, leading to arbitration. The appellants did not submit a written statement of defense during arbitration and later attempted to introduce new documents through a Section 151 CPC application, which was dismissed by the lower court, along with their Section 34 petition challenging the arbitral award.

  1. Application under Section 151 CPC: The court denied the appellants’ request to admit late-submitted documents, emphasizing the absence of a written statement of defense as a significant oversight in arbitration participation.
  1. Section 34 Petition Dismissal: The appellate court supported the lower court’s decision, noting the appellants’ failure to effectively engage in the arbitration left the claims unchallenged, affirming the arbitral award.
  1. Interference with Arbitral Award: The High Court reiterated its stance that judicial interference in arbitral awards is constrained and focused only on issues of legality and compliance with public policy, not on reassessment of factual determinations.

Decision: The High Court dismissed both the application under Section 151 CPC and the appeal against the Section 34 petition dismissal, affirming that the arbitration was conducted fairly and the appellants missed their opportunity to contest effectively.

Date of Decision: April 5, 2024

M/s Gaurav Rice Industries and another vs. The Haryana State Coop.

 

Latest Legal News