TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Appellant Cannot Be Permitted To Now Place On Record The Said Documents Once He Did Not Even Bother To File A Written Statement Of Defence: PH High Court Dismisses Application in Arbitration Dispute Over Rice Mill Lease

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Thursday confirmed the dismissal of an appeal by M/s Gaurav Rice Industries, which contested an arbitral award favoring The Haryana State Coop. Supply and Marketing Fed. Limited (HAFED) regarding a breach of a rice mill lease agreement.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The judgment centered on the appellant’s attempt to challenge an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following their failure to fulfill the terms of a lease agreement.

Facts and Issues: The dispute originated from a lease agreement where the appellants failed to comply with payment and other obligations, leading to arbitration. The appellants did not submit a written statement of defense during arbitration and later attempted to introduce new documents through a Section 151 CPC application, which was dismissed by the lower court, along with their Section 34 petition challenging the arbitral award.

  1. Application under Section 151 CPC: The court denied the appellants’ request to admit late-submitted documents, emphasizing the absence of a written statement of defense as a significant oversight in arbitration participation.
  1. Section 34 Petition Dismissal: The appellate court supported the lower court’s decision, noting the appellants’ failure to effectively engage in the arbitration left the claims unchallenged, affirming the arbitral award.
  1. Interference with Arbitral Award: The High Court reiterated its stance that judicial interference in arbitral awards is constrained and focused only on issues of legality and compliance with public policy, not on reassessment of factual determinations.

Decision: The High Court dismissed both the application under Section 151 CPC and the appeal against the Section 34 petition dismissal, affirming that the arbitration was conducted fairly and the appellants missed their opportunity to contest effectively.

Date of Decision: April 5, 2024

M/s Gaurav Rice Industries and another vs. The Haryana State Coop.

 

Latest Legal News