Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Appellant Cannot Be Permitted To Now Place On Record The Said Documents Once He Did Not Even Bother To File A Written Statement Of Defence: PH High Court Dismisses Application in Arbitration Dispute Over Rice Mill Lease

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Thursday confirmed the dismissal of an appeal by M/s Gaurav Rice Industries, which contested an arbitral award favoring The Haryana State Coop. Supply and Marketing Fed. Limited (HAFED) regarding a breach of a rice mill lease agreement.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The judgment centered on the appellant’s attempt to challenge an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following their failure to fulfill the terms of a lease agreement.

Facts and Issues: The dispute originated from a lease agreement where the appellants failed to comply with payment and other obligations, leading to arbitration. The appellants did not submit a written statement of defense during arbitration and later attempted to introduce new documents through a Section 151 CPC application, which was dismissed by the lower court, along with their Section 34 petition challenging the arbitral award.

  1. Application under Section 151 CPC: The court denied the appellants’ request to admit late-submitted documents, emphasizing the absence of a written statement of defense as a significant oversight in arbitration participation.
  1. Section 34 Petition Dismissal: The appellate court supported the lower court’s decision, noting the appellants’ failure to effectively engage in the arbitration left the claims unchallenged, affirming the arbitral award.
  1. Interference with Arbitral Award: The High Court reiterated its stance that judicial interference in arbitral awards is constrained and focused only on issues of legality and compliance with public policy, not on reassessment of factual determinations.

Decision: The High Court dismissed both the application under Section 151 CPC and the appeal against the Section 34 petition dismissal, affirming that the arbitration was conducted fairly and the appellants missed their opportunity to contest effectively.

Date of Decision: April 5, 2024

M/s Gaurav Rice Industries and another vs. The Haryana State Coop.

 

Latest Legal News