Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Absence of Material Evidence Renders Detention Order Illegal: Kerala High Court Sets Aside COFEPOSA Detention

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court today set aside a detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA), emphasizing the necessity of concrete evidence for such detentions. The case (W.P.(Crl.).No.44 of 2024) involved Shafina Siraj, the petitioner, challenging her husband Siraj V.E.’s detention.

The crux of the legal debate centered around whether there were sufficient materials on record to justify Siraj’s detention for allegedly violating the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA). The detaining authority had based the order on various statements and WhatsApp chats, asserting Siraj’s involvement in illegal foreign exchange transactions.

A search at M/s.Crescent Collection in Kochi led to the seizure of 700 U.A.E. Dirham and Rs.5 lakhs in Indian currency. The detention was primarily based on the statements of Siraj’s aide, Abdul Hameed, and analysis of WhatsApp chats. However, the petitioner contested the lack of concrete evidence linking Siraj to any FEMA violation.

Absence of FEMA Violation Evidence: The court noted Abdul Hameed’s vague statements and the absence of clear evidence connecting Siraj to FEMA violations. Mere possession of foreign currency, as in this case, was deemed insufficient to infer a violation of FEMA.

Reliance on Precedents: The court referred to several apex court judgments, including Nenavath Bujji v. State of Telangana and Others, emphasizing the importance of material evidence and safeguarding individual liberty.

Subjective Satisfaction of Detaining Authority: The judges highlighted that subjective satisfaction should not be an empty formality. There must be substantial materials to support the detention. The court found that the detaining authority might not have applied its mind adequately, as no specific transaction violating FEMA was pointed out.

Decision of the Court Given the lack of substantial evidence, the High Court set aside the detention order, ordering Siraj’s immediate release, provided he is not required in connection with any other legal case.

Date of Decision: 9th April 2024

Shafina Siraj V. Union of India & Others

 

Similar News