(1)
DINESH GUPTA …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
11/07/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Misuse of Criminal Proceedings in Commercial Dispute – Appeal against frivolous criminal proceedings initiated for personal vengeance in a civil matter – Accusations of cheating and forgery in a financial transaction between corporate entities – Abusing legal system by disguising a commercial dispute as a criminal case, leading to unnecessary litigation and misuse of judicial res...
(2)
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOIDA) .....Appellant Vs.
DARSHAN LAL BOHRA & ORS. .....Respondent D.D
10/07/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Land Acquisition – Compliance with Section 5A – The Supreme Court analyzed whether the procedures under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, were duly followed. It emphasized that the Collector must provide an opportunity for personal hearing to the objectors and consider their objections with due application of mind. The failure to do so can vitiate the acquisition proceeding...
(3)
THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
BHAGWANTPAL SINGH ALIAS THROUGH LRS. …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
10/07/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Adverse Possession – Limitation and Burden of Proof – Appellant-State claimed ownership based on adverse possession since 1958 following the donation of land for constructing a Veterinary Hospital – Trial Court decreed possession in favor of plaintiff due to lack of proof of donation – First Appellate Court reversed, acknowledging adverse possession – High Court resto...
(4)
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH …..Appellant Vs.
BMW INDIA PVT LTD AND ORS …..Respondent D.D
10/07/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Quashing of Criminal Proceedings – Defective Vehicle – Compensation in Lieu of Replacement – The High Court quashed the FIR against the respondents for alleged cheating in the sale of a defective BMW car, but directed the replacement of the vehicle with a new one. The Supreme Court, noting the prolonged nature of the dispute and the manufacturer’s compliance willingness, di...
(5)
ROHINI SUDARSHAN GANGURDE …..Appellant Vs.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. …..Respondents D.D
10/07/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Abetment of Suicide – Appeal against High Court order dismissing revision application against Trial Court’s refusal to discharge – Allegations of harassment and physical abuse by wife leading to husband’s suicide – No proximate link established between alleged conduct and suicide – Essential ingredients of instigation or active role in abetm...
(6)
UNIWORLD LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. …..Appellant Vs.
INDEV LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. …..Respondent D.D
10/07/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Order II Rule 2(3) CPC – Leave to Sue Separately – Respondent sought leave under Order II Rule 2(3) CPC for filing a separate suit for recovery of arrears and damages – Trial Court and High Court found no relinquishment or omission in the first suit to bar the second suit – High Court affirmed separate causes of action for the two suits – Appeal dismissed – Cour...
(7)
VIKAS KANAUJIA …..Appellant Vs.
SARITA …..Respondent D.D
10/07/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Divorce – Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage – Exercise of Article 142 Powers – Appeal by husband challenging the High Court’s order dismissing his divorce petition – Husband and wife lived together for only 43 days in total – Separation period of over 22 years – Continuous legal battles and acrimonious relationship – Supreme Court exercises powers ...
(8)
KAZI AKILODDIN …Appellant Vs.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. …Respondents D.D
10/07/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Land Acquisition – Determination of Market Value – Assessment of market value of acquired land for flood protection wall – Appeals concerning compensation awarded by Land Acquisition Officer and Reference Court – High Court’s rejection of Blue Zone classification as per statutory requirements – Supreme Court upholds Reference Court’s award for market value...
(9)
SHANMUGASEKAR .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF TAMIL NADU .....Respondent D.D
10/07/2024
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Murder Conviction – The appellant was convicted for the murder of Muthu due to an altercation over non-payment of electricity bills. The prosecution relied on eyewitness testimony to establish that the appellant attacked the deceased with a billhook, causing fatal injuries. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC, rejecting the defense's argumen...