(1)
KUMARI LAXMI SAROJ AND OTHERS .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
15/12/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Service Law – Appointment – If it is found that there is no lapse/delay on the part of the applicant, he cannot be punished for no fault attributable to him – Respondents directed to appoint the appellants to the post of Health Worker (Female) within six weeks if found meritorious and meeting other eligibility criteria – Appellants entitled to benefits from the date of actu...
(2)
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Appellant Vs.
MOHD. MAQBOOL AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
15/12/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Land Acquisition Act 1894 – Section 4 – Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – Section 24(2) – Lapse of acquisition proceedings – Twin conditions of not taking over possession and not tendering/paying the compensation are required to be satisfied – If one of the conditions is not satisfied the...
(3)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT .....Appellant Vs.
SANDIP OMPRAKASH GUPTA .....Respondent D.D
15/12/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act 2015 – Sections 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), and 3(4) – Continuing unlawful activity – Requires a separate FIR post-promulgation – High Court's interpretation that activities prior to the Act's promulgation cannot be solely considered for prosecution upheld – Appeal dismissed [Paras 1-53].
Decision ...
(4)
WAVE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
15/12/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Land Acquisition Act 1894 – Section 4 – Acquisition of land – Compensation – Appellant challenging the imposition of liabilities for unpaid duty, penalty, and interest accrued before the acquisition of the Amroha sugar mill – Slump Sale Agreement clauses interpreted to distinguish between liabilities accruing before and after the signing date – High Court's ...
(5)
NEERAJ DUTTA .....Appellant Vs.
STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) .....Respondent D.D
15/12/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 – Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) – Proof of demand and acceptance – In the absence of direct evidence from the complainant, it is permissible to draw an inferential deduction of culpability/guilt of a public servant based on other evidence adduced by the prosecution – Demand and acceptance must be proved either by di...
(6)
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOIDA) .....Appellant Vs.
OMVIR SINGH AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
15/12/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Land Acquisition Act 1894 – Section 4 – Acquisition of land – Compensation – Claimants not entitled to the same compensation as awarded for lands acquired after 5 years from the date of acquisition – High Court awarding compensation at Rs.297/- per sq. yard unsustainable – Compensation rate revised to Rs.120/- per sq. yard [Paras 1-6].
Decision &nda...
(7)
GOKAL CHAND (D) THR. LRS. .....Appellant Vs.
AXIS BANK LTD. AND ANOTHER .....Respondent D.D
15/12/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Insurance contract – Deficiency in service – Home loan sanctioned on pre-condition of life insurance policy – Bank acting as an agent for insurance company – Premium accepted and retained after normal medical test results – Malafide actions by insurance company after death of insured – Ante-dated letter issued post death intimation – Refund of premium foll...
(8)
KALICHARAN AND OTHERS .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH .....Respondent D.D
14/12/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Framing of Charge – Failure to Frame Proper Charge – In the case of Kalicharan and others, the accused were charged under Sections 148, 302, and 307 read with Section 149 of IPC – The specific charge framed alleged that Harpal Singh died due to bullet injuries from shots fired by accused no.2 – However, evidence showed Harpal Singh died from i...
(9)
HARIHARAN AND OTHERS .....Appellant Vs.
HARSH VARDHAN SINGH RAO AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
14/12/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Seniority – Inter-Se-Seniority between Promotees and Direct Recruits – Principle of Rotation of Quota – The dispute concerned the fixation of inter-se-seniority between promotees and direct recruits for the post of Income Tax Inspectors in Gujarat – The principle of rotation of quota as provided in the Office Memoranda (OM) dated 7th February 1986 and 3rd July 1986 was appl...