(1)
KAMAL ...APPELLANT(S) Vs.
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ...RESPONDENT(S) D.D
07/08/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Appeal – Conviction based on Circumstantial Evidence – Acquittal – The appellant challenges the judgment and order of the High Court and trial court that convicted him for murder. The appeal revolves around the assessment of the evidence presented by the prosecution. The conviction is questioned based on the insufficiency and unreliability of evidence. [Para 1]
Standa...
(2)
KAMAL Vs.
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) D.D
07/08/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law - Conviction based on Circumstantial Evidence - Standard of Proof - The prosecution must establish the circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is drawn beyond reasonable doubt. The circumstances must be consistent only with the hypothesis of the accused's guilt and should exclude every other possible hypothesis. There must be a complete chain of evidence leaving no reason...
(3)
MANIK B Appellant(s) Vs.
KADAPALA SREYES REDDY & ANR. Respondent(s) D.D
07/08/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Appeal – Quashing of Proceedings – Appellant challenges the impugned order of the High Court – Appellant granted leave – Merits of arguments not considered, given potential impact on trial rights [Para 2].
Scope of Quashing Proceedings – Distinction between quashing proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and application for discharge – High Court c...
(4)
V. SENTHIL BALAJI ...APPELLANT Vs.
STATE REPRESENTED BY
DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS D.D
07/08/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 167(2) - Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 19 - Applicability of Section 167(2) CrPC to proceedings under PMLA Act - Interpretation of statutes - Custody during investigation - The Supreme Court held that the provisions of Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) are applicable to proceedings under the Prevention of M...
(5)
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR. APPELLANT(S) Vs.
SHEELA DEVI RESPONDENT(S) D.D
07/08/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Civil Appeal – Pension Entitlement of Contractual Employees – Appellant challenges High Court’s judgment granting pensionary benefits to contractual employees – Interpretation of Rule 2 and Rule 17 of the CCS Pension Rules, 1972 – Rule 2’s opening phrase “Save as otherwise provided in these rules” permits the application of other provisions – R...
(6)
Pradeep Rameshwar Sharma .… Appellant(s) Vs.
National Investigating Agency & Anr. …. Respondent(s) D.D
05/08/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Appeal – Bail Application – Appellant, a retired police officer, accused in various offenses under IPC, Arms Act, and UAPA – Initially denied bail by Special Court and High Court – Appeals to Supreme Court. [Para 1-3]
Charges and Allegations – Accused of involvement in planting gelatin sticks and a murder conspiracy – High Court found a “feeble...
(7)
ASHOK SHEWAKRAMANI & ORS. ... APPELLANT(S) Vs.
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S) D.D
03/08/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Appeals – Quashing of Complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act – Vicarious liability of directors – Compliance with the requirements of Section 141(1) – Allegations lacking in complaints – Appeals allowed.
Criminal Appeal – Quashing of Complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act – Vicarious liability of ...
(8)
Razia Khan … Appellant Vs.
The State of M.P. … Respondent D.D
03/08/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sections 333, 353, and 451 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Appellant convicted by the Sessions Court - High Court upheld conviction but reduced the sentences - Appeal before the Supreme Court confined to the sentencing part - Appellant claimed benefit of probation under Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) and/or the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Arguments base...
(9)
SUNIL KUMAR .....APPELLANT Vs.
STATE OF U.P. & ANR. .....RESPONDENTS D.D
03/08/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Quashing of proceedings - Alleged altercation between the appellant and respondent no. 2 in the office - Cross complaints filed by both parties - Chargesheet filed against the appellant for offenses under Sections 323, 504, and 506 IPC - Proceedings pending since 2015 - Trivial nature of allegations - Lack of progress in the case - Continuing proceedings leading to persecution and harassment - Pet...