(1)
DINESH B.S. APPELLANT Vs.
STATE OF KARNATAKA RESPONDENT D.D
27/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Eyewitness Testimony - Credibility - Inconsistencies in testimony - Testimony contradicted by other witnesses - Doubts raised on the presence of eyewitness at the scene of the crime. (Para 7)
Extra-judicial Confession - Newspaper Report - Hearsay Evidence - Newspaper reports not considered primary evidence - Extra-judicial confession based on newspaper report deemed unreliable - Benefit of doub...
(2)
L/Nk Gursewak Singh ... Appellant Vs.
Union of India & Anr. ... Respondents D.D
27/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 304 - Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 - Section 30 - Army Act, 1950 - Section 69 - Appellant, an Indian Army Lance Naik, convicted under IPC Section 302 and Army Act Section 69 - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Incident involved a sudden altercation over seniority, leading to the appellant firing one fatal bullet from the deceased's rifle - A...
(3)
M/S J.P.LIGHTS INDIA Vs.
THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I.
CORPORATION, BANGALORE D.D
27/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Civil Appeal – Appellant challenging the dismissal of its appeal against the Employees State Insurance Court’s order – Definition of “Factory” and “manufacturing process” under the Employees State Insurance Act – Dispute whether the appellant-firm falls within the ambit of the definition – Relevant provisions of the ESI Act and Factories Act ex...
(4)
MR. LAXMAN BAPPAJI NAIK (DEAD THROUGH LRS) Vs.
RANJEET @ RANU YADAV DOKH & ANR. D.D
27/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Advocates Act, 1961; Section 35 – Professional Misconduct – Advocate A-1 failed to disclose conflict of interest as his wife claimed rights over the property in dispute – Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa suspended A-1's license for two years and reprimanded A-2, his son and junior colleague, with an undertaking for future conduct.
Conflict of Interest – ...
(5)
DILIP KUMAR ………………………. APPELLANT Vs.
BRAJRAJ SHRIVASTAVA & ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS D.D
26/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 200, 202(1), 203 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 323, 342, 500, 504, 506, 295-A, 298, 427 - Dismissal of Complaint without Proper Inquiry - Remand by High Court for Section 202(1) Inquiry - Validity. (Para 4-5)
The learned Magistrate dismissed the complaint under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C. without conducting a proper inquiry mandated by Section 202(1...
(6)
M/S UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. …PETITIONER(S) Vs.
SURESH CHAND JAIN & ANR. …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
26/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Jurisdiction – Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Maintainability of petition before High Court against NCDRC order – Scope of judicial functions and powers – Remedies under Act 2019 – Appeal to Supreme Court and High Court jurisdiction – National Commission as a “Tribunal” – Writ petition under Article 227 maintainable before High Court – S...
(7)
HEM RAJ ….. APPELLANT(S) Vs.
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. …..RESPONDENT(S) D.D
25/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Insurance Law – Motor Insurance – Third-Party Coverage – Reimbursement of Medical Expenses – National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) disallowed indemnification of medical expenses incurred by the insured-appellant towards the treatment of an injured third-party in an accident – Supreme Court found exhibits (medical bills) on record supporting the medic...
(8)
Chennupati Kranthi Kumar … Appellant Vs.
The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents D.D
25/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Procedure – Passport Impounding – Jurisdiction of Police and Passport Authority – The power to impound a passport lies with the Passport Authority under the Passports Act, 1967, and not with the police. Even if the police seize a passport under Section 102 of Cr.P.C., they cannot withhold it and must forward it to the Passport Authority for their decision on impounding. ...
(9)
HIRENDRANATH GOHAIN Petitioner(s) Vs.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) D.D
24/07/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Delimitation Act 2002 – Section 10A and Representation of the People Act 1950 – Section 8A – Constitutionality challenged – Deferral of delimitation exercise in a State due to threats to unity, integrity, peace, and public order – Rescission of deferment order and entrusting delimitation exercise to the Election Commission – Challenge to the political inclusivit...