Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Undertrial prisoners and convicts released during COVID-19 pandemic on parole or interim bail must surrender : Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India has issued a judgment in a case related to the release of prisoners on emergency parole or interim bail due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Director General (Prisons), New Delhi had filed a petition seeking directions for the surrender of such prisoners/inmates who were released on Emergency Parole or interim bail pursuant to the recommendations of the High-Powered Committee, in compliance with the Orders dated 23.03.2020, 07.05.2021 and 16.07.2021 passed by the Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition No.01/2020, as the COVID-19 situation has now normalized.

Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned ASG appearing on behalf of the applicant, submitted that a High-Powered Committee was constituted in Delhi to determine the category of prisoners i.e. convicts and under-trial prisoners for being released on Emergency Parole and Interim Bail. In 1st phase in 2020, a total of 4683 (1184 convicts and 3499 under-trial) prisoners were released. Thereafter, looking at the unprecedented surge in COVID-19 cases during the second wave, the High-Powered Committee granted parole of 90 days to all the inmates who had been released pursuant to the order dated 23.03.2020 subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions. In compliance of the order dated 07.05.2021 passed by the Supreme Court, a total of 3630 under trial prisoners and 751 convicts were released on interim bail or emergency parole till date in terms of the Orders passed by the Supreme Court.

Ms. Bhati further pointed out that out of total 751 convicts who were released on emergency parole, 71 convicts have surrendered voluntarily till date; similarly out of 3630 under-trial prisoners who were released on interim bail on the basis of criteria laid down by High-Powered Committee, 267 undertrials have surrendered in Jail with the order of Court. The number of convicts who are still on emergency parole is 680 and number of undertrial who are still on interim bail is 3365.

The Supreme Court allowed the present application with the direction that all those under trials/convicts who have been released on Emergency Parole/Interim Bail pursuant to the recommendation of the High-Powered Committee, in compliance of the Orders dated 23.03.2020, 07.05.2021 and 16.07.2021 passed by this Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition No.01/2020 have to surrender before the concerned prison authorities within 15 days.

The Court observed that after the concerned prisoners/inmates surrender before the concerned prison authorities, it will be open for the concerned undertrials to pray for bail before the competent court and their applications will be considered in accordance with law and on its own merits. The Supreme Court allowed the present application by the Director General (Prisons), New Delhi seeking appropriate directions for surrender of prisoners/inmates who had been released on Emergency Parole or Interim Bail pursuant to the recommendation of the High-Powered Committee, in compliance with the orders dated 23.03.2020, 07.05.2021 and 16.07.2021 passed by the court in Suo Moto Writ Petition No.01/2020, as the COVID-19 situation has now normalized. All the undertrial prisoners/convicts were released on interim bail/emergency parole due to the overcrowding in the prisons and to prevent the spread of COVID-19 virus among prisoners in over-crowded prisons. As the situation has now normalized, all those prisoners/inmates/undertrial prisoners/convicts who are/were released on emergency parole/interim bail have to surrender before the concerned prison authorities within 15 days. The concerned jail authorities must inform the concerned Accused/inmates about the order. After the concerned prisoners/inmates surrender before the concerned prison authorities, it will be open for the concerned undertrials to pray for bail before the competent court and their applications will be considered in accordance with law and on its own merits. Similarly, after the surrender by the concerned convicts who are released on Emergency Parole, it will be open for them to pray for suspension of sentence before the concerned Court in their appeals which might have been pending which also may be considered in accordance with law and/or on merits.

In Re: Contagion of Covid-19 Virus in Prisons And Director General (Prisons)

Latest Legal News