Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked For Restoration Of Possession When Statutory Remedy Under Section 144 Exists: Calcutta High Court 'Mere Assertion Of Higher Rent By Landlord Cannot Oust DRC Act': Delhi High Court Sets Aside Eviction Decree, Remands Matter Back Sections 27 & 65B Evidence Act Flouted | Police Cannot Jeopardise Liberty On Surmises: Supreme Court Awards ₹6 Lakh Reparation To Acquitted Undertrial Jailed For 6 Years RTI Act | Registrar Can Access Co-Operative Society Records For Information Applicant Without Prior Inquiry Satisfaction: Supreme Court Textiles Committee Act | Job Work Processing Of Handloom/Powerloom Fabric Not 'Manufacture', Cannot Borrow Definition From Central Excise Act: Supreme Court Order 21 CPC | Executing Court Must Adjudicate Third-Party Claims, Separate Suit Explicitly Barred Under Rule 101: Supreme Court Wakf Act | Gazette Notification Under Sec 5(2) Final If Unchallenged Within Limitation; Suit For Injunction Maintainable Without Title Declaration: Supreme Court Land Acquisition Act | Acquisition For Housing Society Requires Prior Approval Of Concrete Layout Scheme; Fraud Overrides Res Judicata & Delay: Supreme Court Electricity Act | Consumers Facing Power Theft Charges Entitled To Procedural Safeguards Under Section 126; Can File Objections & Appeal Under Section 127: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Supreme Court Directs Full & Final Settlement Of Debt Assigned To ARC To Save Running Enterprise, Disposes Section 7 IBC Proceedings IBC | CoC Cannot Withdraw Approved Resolution Plan From NCLT Merely Because Corporate Debtor's Financial Position Improved: Supreme Court Mere Presence As Customer At Spa Centre Does Not Attract Offences Under Sections 3, 4 & 5 Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Section 376 IPC | Absence Of External Injuries Or Semen Does Not Discredit Credible Testimony Of Prosecutrix; Minor's Consent Immaterial: Allahabad High Court Probate Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Disinheritance Of Natural Heirs If Propounder Successfully Removes Suspicious Circumstances: Bombay High Court Challenge To Decades-Old Patta Cancellation Barred By Delay & Laches; Litigant Sleeping Over Rights Cannot Unsettle Settled Position: Kerala High Court POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained On Victim’s Testimony If Found Inconsistent With FIR And Section 164 CrPC Statements: Calcutta High Court Preventive Detention | Unexplained Delay And Failure To Seek Cancellation Of Bail Vitiate Detention Order: Kerala High Court Once Execution & Attestation Are Proved, Suspicion Of Delay No Longer Operates: Bombay High Court Grants Probate In 26-Year-Old Will Dispute Tenant Cannot Claim Valid Surrender Of Premises By Handing Over Keys To One Co-Owner Who Is Also Company Director: Delhi High Court Taxation Law | Assessee Cannot Challenge Show Cause Notice After Opting For Settlement Commission: Delhi High Court Order 21 Rule 10 CPC | Decree For Mere Declaration Not Executable, Executing Court Cannot Direct Recovery Without Consequential Relief: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 65B Indian Evidence Act | Electronic Records Not Accompanied By Certificate Are Inadmissible; Oral Evidence Cannot Substitute Mandatory Statutory Compliance: Madras High Court Reservation Beyond 50% Ceiling Without Extraordinary Circumstances Violates Articles 14, 15 And 16: Karnataka High Court Magistrate Can Take Cognizance Of Hate Speech Delivered In Closed Premises If Circulated On Social Media: Madras High Court No Development Cut Applicable On Land Acquisition Compensation When Both Acquired Land And Exemplar Are Small Plots: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'Extremely Barbaric': Orissa High Court Commutes Death Sentence To Life Imprisonment For Man Who Stabbed Wife 49 Times Motor Vehicles Act | Breach Of Licence Condition Doesn't Absolve Insurer Of Statutory Liability Towards Third Parties; 'Pay & Recover' Applies: Punjab & Haryana High Court Is Prior Notice To Judgment Debtor Mandatory In Possession Or Eviction Executions Filed Within Two Years? MP High Court Refers Question To Larger Bench Section 5 Limitation Act Inapplicable To Persona Designata; Quasi-Judicial Appellate Authority Cannot Condone Delay Absent Express Enabling Provision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Upholds Legal Continuity of FERA Offences Under FEMA: Sets Precedent for Post-Repeal Prosecution

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has ruled in a landmark judgment that the repeal of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA), by the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA), does not hinder the prosecution of offences previously covered under FERA. The decision, delivered by a bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, has far-reaching implications for cases involving financial irregularities and foreign exchange violations.

The judgment, which underscores the principle of legal continuity, reaffirms that penalties, liabilities, and prosecutions for acts committed under FERA remain valid even after its repeal. Citing Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, the Court made a compelling argument, stating, "What remains to be done, after the Act came into force, is the quantification, if necessary, after due investigation and legal proceedings and if proved to impose the penalty, forfeiture, or punishment."

The decision sets a precedent for cases where the FERA provisions are invoked post its repeal by FEMA. The Court emphasized that the legal proceedings for enforcing rights, liabilities, penalties, and forfeitures incurred during FERA's existence are preserved by operation of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act.

Mr. Siddhartha Dave, learned senior counsel representing the appellants, had argued that the repeal of FERA rendered the complaints filed by an Enforcement Officer under FEMA invalid. However, the Court rejected this contention, highlighting that such an interpretation would render the statutory provisions unworkable.

Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General representing the respondents, supported the view that the prosecution for offences under FERA continued to be governed by the provisions of FERA, as preserved by FEMA.

This judgment underscores the importance of maintaining legal consistency and preserving the rights and liabilities of individuals and entities even after the repeal of an Act. It clarifies the legal landscape surrounding the transition from FERA to FEMA, providing clarity to the enforcement authorities and the legal community regarding the prosecution of financial offences committed during FERA's tenure.

Date of Decision: September 21, 2023

First Global Stockbroking Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs nil Rishiraj & Anr.       

       

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/21-Sep-2023_First_global_Stockbroking_Vs_Anil_Rishiraj.pdf"]

Latest Legal News