'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Legal Continuity of FERA Offences Under FEMA: Sets Precedent for Post-Repeal Prosecution

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has ruled in a landmark judgment that the repeal of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA), by the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA), does not hinder the prosecution of offences previously covered under FERA. The decision, delivered by a bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, has far-reaching implications for cases involving financial irregularities and foreign exchange violations.

The judgment, which underscores the principle of legal continuity, reaffirms that penalties, liabilities, and prosecutions for acts committed under FERA remain valid even after its repeal. Citing Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, the Court made a compelling argument, stating, "What remains to be done, after the Act came into force, is the quantification, if necessary, after due investigation and legal proceedings and if proved to impose the penalty, forfeiture, or punishment."

The decision sets a precedent for cases where the FERA provisions are invoked post its repeal by FEMA. The Court emphasized that the legal proceedings for enforcing rights, liabilities, penalties, and forfeitures incurred during FERA's existence are preserved by operation of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act.

Mr. Siddhartha Dave, learned senior counsel representing the appellants, had argued that the repeal of FERA rendered the complaints filed by an Enforcement Officer under FEMA invalid. However, the Court rejected this contention, highlighting that such an interpretation would render the statutory provisions unworkable.

Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General representing the respondents, supported the view that the prosecution for offences under FERA continued to be governed by the provisions of FERA, as preserved by FEMA.

This judgment underscores the importance of maintaining legal consistency and preserving the rights and liabilities of individuals and entities even after the repeal of an Act. It clarifies the legal landscape surrounding the transition from FERA to FEMA, providing clarity to the enforcement authorities and the legal community regarding the prosecution of financial offences committed during FERA's tenure.

Date of Decision: September 21, 2023

First Global Stockbroking Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs nil Rishiraj & Anr.       

       

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/21-Sep-2023_First_global_Stockbroking_Vs_Anil_Rishiraj.pdf"]

Latest Legal News