Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Supreme Court Upholds Legal Continuity of FERA Offences Under FEMA: Sets Precedent for Post-Repeal Prosecution

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has ruled in a landmark judgment that the repeal of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA), by the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA), does not hinder the prosecution of offences previously covered under FERA. The decision, delivered by a bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, has far-reaching implications for cases involving financial irregularities and foreign exchange violations.

The judgment, which underscores the principle of legal continuity, reaffirms that penalties, liabilities, and prosecutions for acts committed under FERA remain valid even after its repeal. Citing Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, the Court made a compelling argument, stating, "What remains to be done, after the Act came into force, is the quantification, if necessary, after due investigation and legal proceedings and if proved to impose the penalty, forfeiture, or punishment."

The decision sets a precedent for cases where the FERA provisions are invoked post its repeal by FEMA. The Court emphasized that the legal proceedings for enforcing rights, liabilities, penalties, and forfeitures incurred during FERA's existence are preserved by operation of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act.

Mr. Siddhartha Dave, learned senior counsel representing the appellants, had argued that the repeal of FERA rendered the complaints filed by an Enforcement Officer under FEMA invalid. However, the Court rejected this contention, highlighting that such an interpretation would render the statutory provisions unworkable.

Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General representing the respondents, supported the view that the prosecution for offences under FERA continued to be governed by the provisions of FERA, as preserved by FEMA.

This judgment underscores the importance of maintaining legal consistency and preserving the rights and liabilities of individuals and entities even after the repeal of an Act. It clarifies the legal landscape surrounding the transition from FERA to FEMA, providing clarity to the enforcement authorities and the legal community regarding the prosecution of financial offences committed during FERA's tenure.

Date of Decision: September 21, 2023

First Global Stockbroking Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs nil Rishiraj & Anr.       

       

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/21-Sep-2023_First_global_Stockbroking_Vs_Anil_Rishiraj.pdf"]

Latest Legal News