Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court Possession Of 'Bhang' Not An Offence Under NDPS Act, Specific Definition Excludes It: Jharkhand High Court Acquits Man Trial Court Cannot Reject Request For Handwriting Expert Merely Because Signatures Are On Photocopies: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Settlement Commission's Order, Remands Matter for Fresh Decision

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment JAGDISH TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.  , the Supreme Court of India has set aside the order passed by the Settlement Commission in the case of Jagdish Transport Corporation & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. The court remanded the matter for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for compliance with due procedure under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case stemmed from a search and seizure operation conducted under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act. Notices under Section 153A were issued to the appellants for the assessment years 1998-1999 to 2004-2005. Subsequently, the appellants filed their income tax returns under Section 153A and also submitted an application for settlement before the Settlement Commission under Section 245C(1) of the Act.

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, had directed the Settlement Commission to dispose of the application by a specific date. However, in its order dated March 31, 2008, the Settlement Commission observed that it was not practicable to examine the records and investigate the case properly. Despite this observation, the Settlement Commission passed an order to comply with the High Court's directions.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, held that the Settlement Commission's order was a nullity and not in accordance with the law. It noted that the Settlement Commission itself had acknowledged the impracticability of examining the records and providing adequate opportunity to both the applicant and the Department, as required under Section 245D(4) of the Act.

The Court further highlighted that the High Court should have remitted the matter back to the Settlement Commission for a fresh decision in accordance with the law and on its merits. However, since the Settlement Commission has been wound up, the matters pending before it are being adjudicated and decided by the interim Board constituted under Section 245AA of the Act. Thus, the Court remanded the matter to the interim Board with a request for an expeditious decision within six months.

Date: April 28, 2023

JAGDISH TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Latest Legal News