Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Rules Against Life Insurance Corporation's Levy of Service Charge for Policy Assignment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India ruled against the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) in a case challenging the legality of levying a service charge for recording the assignment of life insurance policies. The case, titled *Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.*, centered on the contentious issue of whether LIC had the authority to impose a registration charge of Rs. 250 per assignment.

The court, led by Justice Abhay S. Oka, scrutinized various aspects of the case, including statutory provisions, constitutional implications, and regulatory authority. The judgment firmly concluded that LIC's practice of levying the service charge was unconstitutional and without legal basis.

In a key observation, the court stated, "The question is whether the appellant-insurer is lawfully entitled to levy a service charge of Rs. 250 for a transaction of assignment of a life insurance policy." The court emphasized that neither the statutory provisions nor the contract of the policy provided any authorization for such a charge. Moreover, regulations issued by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India expressly prohibited additional fees for recording assignments.

The judgment reaffirms the principle that fees or charges must have a legitimate legal basis, especially in the context of insurance policies that impact the financial interests of policyholders. The court's decision highlights the importance of adherence to statutory provisions and regulatory guidelines in the financial services sector.

The case had seen LIC attempting to defend its fee imposition as a necessary part of a business transaction, but the court rejected this argument. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision that the service charge levied by LIC for policy assignments was unconstitutional.

This verdict serves as a significant precedent, underscoring the need for financial institutions to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks when implementing fees or charges related to financial products.

Date of Decision: September 6, 2023

Life Insurance Corporation of India  vs Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.                          

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/06-Sep-2023_LIC_Vs_DRAVYA-FINANCE-PVT.-LTD.pdf"]

Latest Legal News