“Possession Follows Title” Not An Absolute Rule When Ownership Is Disputed: Andhra Pradesh High Court ORDER 30 CPC | Appeal Filed by Firm Does Not Abate on Death of Partners: Calcutta High Court Bank Cannot Freeze Customer’s Account Based on Third-Party Dispute: Calcutta High Court Slams Axis Bank Not Every Middleman Is a Trafficker: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail in International Cyber Trafficking Case, Cites Absence of Mens Rea Stay in One Corner Freezes the Whole Map: Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Decades-Old Land Acquisition Despite 11-Year Delay in Award Parole Once Granted Cannot Be Made Illusory by Imposing Impossible Conditions: Rajasthan High Court Declares Mechanical Surety Requirement for Indigent Convicts Unconstitutional Once Acquisition Is Complete, Title Disputes Fall Outside Civil Court Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Appeal Lies Against Lok Adalat Compromise Decree Even on Grounds of Fraud: Orissa High Court Declares First Appeal Not Maintainable POCSO | Absence of Medical Corroboration Not Fatal; Sole Testimony of Minor Victim Sufficient for Conviction: Orissa High Court Limitation Act | Article 137 Applies to Applications Under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC; 3-Year Limit Cannot Be Rendered Illusory: Punjab & Haryana High Court Benami Defence Cannot Override Registered Ownership: Delhi High Court Buries 35-Year-Old Family Settlement Claim Over Property Dispute Off-Road Construction Vehicles Not ‘Motor Vehicles’ Under Law: Supreme Court Quashes Road Tax on Dumpers, Excavators, and Dozers

Supreme Court Rules Against Life Insurance Corporation's Levy of Service Charge for Policy Assignment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India ruled against the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) in a case challenging the legality of levying a service charge for recording the assignment of life insurance policies. The case, titled *Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.*, centered on the contentious issue of whether LIC had the authority to impose a registration charge of Rs. 250 per assignment.

The court, led by Justice Abhay S. Oka, scrutinized various aspects of the case, including statutory provisions, constitutional implications, and regulatory authority. The judgment firmly concluded that LIC's practice of levying the service charge was unconstitutional and without legal basis.

In a key observation, the court stated, "The question is whether the appellant-insurer is lawfully entitled to levy a service charge of Rs. 250 for a transaction of assignment of a life insurance policy." The court emphasized that neither the statutory provisions nor the contract of the policy provided any authorization for such a charge. Moreover, regulations issued by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India expressly prohibited additional fees for recording assignments.

The judgment reaffirms the principle that fees or charges must have a legitimate legal basis, especially in the context of insurance policies that impact the financial interests of policyholders. The court's decision highlights the importance of adherence to statutory provisions and regulatory guidelines in the financial services sector.

The case had seen LIC attempting to defend its fee imposition as a necessary part of a business transaction, but the court rejected this argument. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision that the service charge levied by LIC for policy assignments was unconstitutional.

This verdict serves as a significant precedent, underscoring the need for financial institutions to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks when implementing fees or charges related to financial products.

Date of Decision: September 6, 2023

Life Insurance Corporation of India  vs Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.                          

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/06-Sep-2023_LIC_Vs_DRAVYA-FINANCE-PVT.-LTD.pdf"]

Latest Legal News