High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

Supreme Court Rules Against Life Insurance Corporation's Levy of Service Charge for Policy Assignment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India ruled against the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) in a case challenging the legality of levying a service charge for recording the assignment of life insurance policies. The case, titled *Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.*, centered on the contentious issue of whether LIC had the authority to impose a registration charge of Rs. 250 per assignment.

The court, led by Justice Abhay S. Oka, scrutinized various aspects of the case, including statutory provisions, constitutional implications, and regulatory authority. The judgment firmly concluded that LIC's practice of levying the service charge was unconstitutional and without legal basis.

In a key observation, the court stated, "The question is whether the appellant-insurer is lawfully entitled to levy a service charge of Rs. 250 for a transaction of assignment of a life insurance policy." The court emphasized that neither the statutory provisions nor the contract of the policy provided any authorization for such a charge. Moreover, regulations issued by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India expressly prohibited additional fees for recording assignments.

The judgment reaffirms the principle that fees or charges must have a legitimate legal basis, especially in the context of insurance policies that impact the financial interests of policyholders. The court's decision highlights the importance of adherence to statutory provisions and regulatory guidelines in the financial services sector.

The case had seen LIC attempting to defend its fee imposition as a necessary part of a business transaction, but the court rejected this argument. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision that the service charge levied by LIC for policy assignments was unconstitutional.

This verdict serves as a significant precedent, underscoring the need for financial institutions to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks when implementing fees or charges related to financial products.

Date of Decision: September 6, 2023

Life Insurance Corporation of India  vs Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.                          

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/06-Sep-2023_LIC_Vs_DRAVYA-FINANCE-PVT.-LTD.pdf"]

Latest Legal News