Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Supreme Court Quashes Government Orders Establishing Anti Land Grabbing Special Cells in Tamil Nadu

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, May 4, 2023: In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the decision of the Madras High Court to quash government orders that established Anti Land Grabbing Special Cells in Tamil Nadu. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justice M.R. Shah.

The government orders in question, G.O. (Ms.) No. 423 dated 28.07.2011 and G.O. (Ms.) No. 451 dated 11.08.2011, sanctioned the formation of 36 Anti Land Grabbing Special Cells in Tamil Nadu to tackle the rising issue of land grabbing in the state. However, the High Court had allowed writ petitions challenging these orders, citing the absence of guidelines and the potential for abuse of power.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, concurred with the High Court's reasoning. It noted that the government orders did not provide clear guidelines for selecting land grabbing cases, leaving it to the discretion of the police officers attached to the Anti Land Grabbing Special Cells. This lack of clarity opened the door for arbitrary exercise of power and the possibility of abuse and misuse. The court emphasized that the absence of a specific definition of "land grabbing" further compounded the issue.

While upholding the High Court's decision to quash the government orders, the Supreme Court suggested that the state government enact appropriate legislation on the lines of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982. The court emphasized the importance of defining "land grabbing" and "land grabber" and providing clear guidelines for identifying and addressing such cases.

The judgment also clarified that the dismissal of the appeals and the quashing of the government orders should not hinder the state government from enacting new legislation or better legislations to combat land grabbing effectively.

In a separate Criminal Appeal No. 275 of 2022, which involved the transfer of a land grabbing case from a Special Judicial Magistrate to a Judicial Magistrate-II, Erode, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, citing its concurrence with the High Court's decision.

May 4, 2023

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU VS THAMARAISELVAM ETC. ETC.   

Latest Legal News