Mere Allegations of Harassment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail to Wife in Matrimonial Suicide Case 'Convenience Of Wife Not A Thumb Rule, But Custody Of Minor Child Is A Weighing Aspect': Punjab & Haryana HC Transfers Divorce Case To Rohtak MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Cooperative Society Is A “Veritable Party” To Arbitration Clause In Flat Agreements, Temple Trust Entitled To Arbitrate As Non-Signatory: Bombay High Court State Government Cannot Review Its Own Revisional Orders Under Section 41(3): Allahabad High Court Affirms Legal Bar on Successive Reviews When Several Issues Arise, Courts Must Answer Each With Reasons: Supreme Court Automatic Retention Trumps Lessee Tag: Calcutta High Court Declares Saregama India ‘Raiyat’, Directs Reconsideration of Land Conversion Application Recovery of Valid Ticket Raises Presumption of Bona Fide Travel – Burden Shifts to Railways: Delhi High Court Restores Railway Accident Claim Failure to Frame Issue on Limitation Vitiates Award of Compensation Under Telegraph Act: Gauhati High Court Sets Aside Order, Remands Matter Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Heritable Right: Gujarat High Court Rejects 9-Year Delayed Claim, Orders Re-Issuance of ₹4 Lakh Compensation Court Cannot Rewrite Contracts to Suit Contractor’s Convenience: Kerala High Court Upholds Termination of Road Work Under Risk and Cost Clause Post-Bail Conduct Is Irrelevant in Appeal Against Grant of Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Crucial Distinction Between Appeal and Cancellation Granting Anticipatory Bail to a Long-Absconding Accused Makes a Mockery of the Judicial Process: Supreme Court Cracks Down on Pre-Arrest Bail in Murder Case Recognition as an Intangible Asset Does Not Confer Ownership: Supreme Court Draws a Sharp Line Between Accounting Entries and Property Rights IBC Cannot Be the Guiding Principle for Restructuring the Ownership and Control of Spectrum: Supreme Court Reasserts Public Trust Over Natural Resources Courts Cannot Convict First and Search for Law Later: Supreme Court Faults Prosecution for Ignoring Statutory Foundation in Cement Case When the Law Itself Stood Withdrawn, How Could Its Violation Survive?: Supreme Court Quashes 1994 Cement Conviction Under E.C. Act Ten Years Means Ten Years – Not a Day Less: Supreme Court Refuses to Dilute Statutory Experience Requirement for SET Exemption SET in Malayalam Cannot Qualify You to Teach Economics: Supreme Court Upholds Subject-Specific Eligibility for HSST Appointments Outsourcing Cannot Become A Tool To Defeat Regularization: Supreme Court On Perennial Nature Of Government Work Once Similarly Placed Workers Were Regularized, Denial to Others Is Discrimination: Supreme Court Directs Regularization of Income Tax Daily-Wage Workers Right To Form Association Is Protected — But Not A Right To Run It Free From Regulation: Supreme Court Recalibrates Article 19 In Sports Governance S. Nithya Cannot Be Transplanted Into Cricket: Supreme Court Shields District Cricket Bodies From Judicially Imposed Structural Overhaul Will | Propounder Must Dispel Every Suspicious Circumstance — Failure Is Fatal: : Punjab & Haryana High Court Electronic Evidence Authenticity Jeopardized by Unexplained Delay and Procedural Omissions: MP High Court Rejects Belated 65B Application Not Answering to the Questions of the IO Would Not Ipso Facto Mean There Is Non-Cooperation: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Undertaking to Satisfy Award Is Not Waiver of Appeal: Supreme Court Restores Insurer’s Statutory Right

Supreme Court Demands Urgent National Safety Protocols for Hospitals, Warns "Nation Cannot Await a Rape or Murder for Real Changes"

23 August 2024 12:24 PM

By: sayum


The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu order dated August 20, 2024, addressed the urgent need for workplace safety reforms for medical professionals in the aftermath of the alleged rape and murder of a postgraduate doctor at RG Kar Medical College Hospital in Kolkata. The bench, comprising Chief Justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, highlighted the systemic deficiencies in healthcare institutions, particularly the lack of safety protocols and protection against violence. The court constituted a National Task Force (NTF) to formulate comprehensive recommendations on these issues.

On August 9, 2024, a 31-year-old postgraduate doctor was brutally murdered and allegedly raped within the seminar room of RG Kar Medical College Hospital in Kolkata. The incident, which occurred during her 36-hour duty shift, led to widespread public outcry and protests, raising significant concerns about the safety and security of medical professionals in India. Initial reports to the victim's family suggested suicide, but further investigation revealed foul play, leading to demands for a court-monitored investigation.

The Supreme Court noted the lack of institutional safety measures in hospitals, especially the absence of proper resting spaces, inadequate security, and the unrestricted access of the public to sensitive hospital areas. "The nation cannot await a rape or murder for real changes on the ground," the court remarked, stressing that the safety of medical professionals is a matter of national interest​.

The court specifically addressed the heightened risks faced by female medical professionals, who are more vulnerable to both sexual and non-sexual violence due to ingrained patriarchal attitudes. The bench cited the case of Aruna Shanbag as an example of how sexual violence can originate within the institutional settings themselves, further emphasizing the need for gender-sensitive safety protocols​.

Recognizing the gravity of the situation, the Supreme Court constituted a National Task Force (NTF) comprising eminent medical professionals and senior government officials. The NTF is tasked with developing an enforceable national protocol aimed at preventing violence, including gender-based violence, and ensuring dignified and safe working conditions for all medical professionals. The court mandated the NTF to submit an interim report within three weeks and a final report within two months​.

The court's order outlined a detailed action plan for the NTF, including the deployment of security personnel, installation of CCTV cameras, provision of adequate resting spaces, and the establishment of police posts in hospitals. The court also emphasized the need for infrastructure improvements, such as proper lighting and screening mechanisms to prevent the entry of weapons into medical establishments​​.

"The constitutional value of equality demands nothing else and will not brook compromises on the health, well-being, and safety of those who provide health care to others," the court stated, underlining the importance of safe working conditions in healthcare institutions​.

The Supreme Court's order underscores the urgent need for systemic reforms in healthcare institutions across India to protect medical professionals from violence and ensure their safety. By directing the formation of a National Task Force, the court has taken a significant step towards addressing these critical issues, with potential far-reaching implications for the healthcare sector. The progress of these reforms, as mandated by the court, will be closely monitored, with updates expected in the coming weeks.

In Re: Alleged Rape and Murder Incident of a Trainee Doctor in R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata and Related Issues

Date of Decision: August 20, 2024

 

Latest Legal News