Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction When Death Is Caused by an Unforeseeable Forest Fire, Criminal Prosecution Cannot Be Sustained Without Proof of Rashness, Negligence, or Knowledge: Supreme Court Proof of Accident Alone is Not Enough – Claimants Must Prove Involvement of Offending Vehicle Under Section 166 MV Act: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Compensation in Fatal Road Accident Case Income Tax | Search Means Search, Not ‘Other Person’: Section 153C Collapses When the Assessee Himself Is Searched: Karnataka High Court Draws a Clear Red Line License Fee on Hoardings is Regulatory, Not Tax; GST Does Not Bar Municipal Levy: Bombay High Court Filing Forged Bank Statement to Mislead Court in Maintenance Case Is Prima Facie Offence Under Section 466 IPC: Allahabad High Court Upholds Summoning Continued Cruelty and Concealment of Infertility Justify Divorce: Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Divorce Disguising Punishment as Simplicity Is Abuse of Power: Delhi High Court Quashes Dismissals of Civil Defence Volunteers for Being Stigmatic, Not Simpliciter Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD"

Supreme Court Demands Urgent National Safety Protocols for Hospitals, Warns "Nation Cannot Await a Rape or Murder for Real Changes"

23 August 2024 12:24 PM

By: sayum


The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu order dated August 20, 2024, addressed the urgent need for workplace safety reforms for medical professionals in the aftermath of the alleged rape and murder of a postgraduate doctor at RG Kar Medical College Hospital in Kolkata. The bench, comprising Chief Justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, highlighted the systemic deficiencies in healthcare institutions, particularly the lack of safety protocols and protection against violence. The court constituted a National Task Force (NTF) to formulate comprehensive recommendations on these issues.

On August 9, 2024, a 31-year-old postgraduate doctor was brutally murdered and allegedly raped within the seminar room of RG Kar Medical College Hospital in Kolkata. The incident, which occurred during her 36-hour duty shift, led to widespread public outcry and protests, raising significant concerns about the safety and security of medical professionals in India. Initial reports to the victim's family suggested suicide, but further investigation revealed foul play, leading to demands for a court-monitored investigation.

The Supreme Court noted the lack of institutional safety measures in hospitals, especially the absence of proper resting spaces, inadequate security, and the unrestricted access of the public to sensitive hospital areas. "The nation cannot await a rape or murder for real changes on the ground," the court remarked, stressing that the safety of medical professionals is a matter of national interest​.

The court specifically addressed the heightened risks faced by female medical professionals, who are more vulnerable to both sexual and non-sexual violence due to ingrained patriarchal attitudes. The bench cited the case of Aruna Shanbag as an example of how sexual violence can originate within the institutional settings themselves, further emphasizing the need for gender-sensitive safety protocols​.

Recognizing the gravity of the situation, the Supreme Court constituted a National Task Force (NTF) comprising eminent medical professionals and senior government officials. The NTF is tasked with developing an enforceable national protocol aimed at preventing violence, including gender-based violence, and ensuring dignified and safe working conditions for all medical professionals. The court mandated the NTF to submit an interim report within three weeks and a final report within two months​.

The court's order outlined a detailed action plan for the NTF, including the deployment of security personnel, installation of CCTV cameras, provision of adequate resting spaces, and the establishment of police posts in hospitals. The court also emphasized the need for infrastructure improvements, such as proper lighting and screening mechanisms to prevent the entry of weapons into medical establishments​​.

"The constitutional value of equality demands nothing else and will not brook compromises on the health, well-being, and safety of those who provide health care to others," the court stated, underlining the importance of safe working conditions in healthcare institutions​.

The Supreme Court's order underscores the urgent need for systemic reforms in healthcare institutions across India to protect medical professionals from violence and ensure their safety. By directing the formation of a National Task Force, the court has taken a significant step towards addressing these critical issues, with potential far-reaching implications for the healthcare sector. The progress of these reforms, as mandated by the court, will be closely monitored, with updates expected in the coming weeks.

In Re: Alleged Rape and Murder Incident of a Trainee Doctor in R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata and Related Issues

Date of Decision: August 20, 2024

 

Latest Legal News