Supreme Court Orders Government Review on Compounding of Royalties in Mining Industry Article 227 Cannot Be Invoked to Bypass Statutory Bar on Interlocutory Orders: Telangana High Court High Court Grants Bail in Multi-Crore Heist Case, Warns Against Irreversible Injustice from Prolonged Pre-Trial Incarceration Uttarakhand HC: ‘Mutation Entries Are Fiscal, Not Title-Binding,’ Directs Disputes to Civil Court Restraining Electricity Connections is Dehors Section 43 of the Act": Rajasthan High Court Re-examination Necessary to Avoid Miscarriage of Justice in Misappropriation Case: Meghalaya High Court POCSO | Offences Against Children Are Offences Against Society and Cannot Be Compromised: Supreme Court Victim’s Testimony U-Turns, Patna High Court Acquits Man in POCSO Case Concealment of Orders and Repetitive Petitions Are Deprecable Conduct: P&H High Court in Parole Denial Case Karnataka High Court Affirms Enforcement of Settlement in Cheque Bounce Case: “No Escape from Lawful Obligations Prosecution Evidence Contradictory and Insufficient : High Court Acquits Man Convicted Under Section 498A IPC Custodial interrogation is unnecessary when the accused express willingness to cooperate with the investigation: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Software Fraud Case Criminal Proceedings Cannot be Used to Settle Civil Matters: J&K High Court Rules, Quashing FIR Filed Under Multiple Sections of Ranbir Penal Code Defense Is Illusory and Sham: Calcutta High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Cheque Dishonor Case 'Significant and Non-Obvious Leap in Probiotic Science: Delhi High Court Orders Revaluation of Alimentary Health's Patent Application High Court Overturns Conviction Due to DNA Evidence Proving Different Perpetrator In Absence of Specific Allegations, Quashing of FIR is Justifiable: Supreme Court Affirms Acquittal in Criminal Case Doesn't Invalidate Departmental Inquiry Findings: Gujarat High Court Responsibility to Install and Maintain Lies with Appellant’ in IOC Dealership Case: Andhra Pradesh High Court Affirms Truth Must Prevail Using Best Available Science: Allahabad High Court Upholds DNA Test Order in Paternity Dispute for Maintenance Claim No Evidence of Life-Threatening Injury: Bombay High Court Reduces Conviction from Attempted Murder to Simple Assault State Policy Directions Cannot Override Regulatory Commission’s Quasi-Judicial Powers: Supreme Court Scope of Referral Courts in Arbitration is Strictly Limited to Existence of Agreement, Not Merits of Dispute: Supreme Court Clear Tendency in Complainant to Improvise Allegations to Settle Marital Scores: High Court on Bail Evidence of Adultery, Cruelty, and Desertion Insufficient: Jharkhand High Court Affirms Dismissal of Divorce Petition Legal Heirs Cannot Be Denied Defense: High Court Remands Partition Suit for Fresh Hearing Karnataka High Court Rejects Time-Barred Suit, Emphasizes 'No Allegations of Fraud or Coercion Purposive Interpretation Necessary: High Court at Calcutta Clarifies Arbitration Scope Bombay High Court Quashes Five-Year Rent Revision Clause in Government Leases, Upholds Ready Reckoner-Based Calculations “If the Testimony is True, We Act on It”: Kerala High Court Upholds Convictions in Divakaran Murder Case

Supreme Court Declares Arvind Kejriwal’s Arrest Under PMLA Illegal, Cites Failure to Comply with Statutory Preconditions

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court’s rejection of Kejriwal’s writ petition overturned, arrest and remand orders nullified due to non-compliance with Section 19(1) PMLA.

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has declared the arrest of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) as illegal. The apex court highlighted the failure to meet the stringent safeguards under Section 19(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The court’s decision overturns the Delhi High Court’s dismissal of Kejriwal’s writ petition challenging his arrest and subsequent remand orders.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered a case (RC No. 0032022A0053) against Kejriwal and others in connection with alleged irregularities in the Delhi excise policy. Following this, the DoE initiated a probe under PMLA, leading to Kejriwal’s arrest on 21st March 2024. Kejriwal challenged his arrest, arguing non-compliance with statutory preconditions required under Section 19 of the PMLA. The Delhi High Court dismissed his petition, leading to the present appeal.

The Supreme Court bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M. Trivedi, emphasized the mandatory preconditions for arrest under Section 19 of the PMLA. “The conditions are stringent safeguards to protect life and liberty of individuals,” the bench noted, stressing the necessity of recording ‘reasons to believe’ that the person is guilty of an offense under the PMLA.

The court delineated the scope of judicial review concerning arrests under PMLA. It underscored that courts must ensure compliance with statutory conditions and constitutional rights, preventing arbitrary exercises of power. The judgment also addressed the necessity to arrest, as articulated in prior rulings such as Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh, asserting that mere non-cooperation with summons does not justify arrest.

The court extensively discussed the principles of evaluating the legality of an arrest. It reiterated that arrest under Section 19 PMLA must be based on recorded ‘reasons to believe’ and not merely on suspicion. “The officer must objectively assess all material in possession, including exculpatory evidence, before forming a belief of guilt,” the judgment stated.

Justice Khanna remarked, “The power to arrest is drastic and extreme, and therefore, must be exercised with utmost care and accountability, ensuring compliance with statutory and constitutional mandates.”

The Supreme Court’s decision to nullify Kejriwal’s arrest underscores the judiciary’s commitment to uphold procedural fairness and constitutional rights. This landmark ruling reinforces the need for stringent adherence to statutory safeguards in cases involving pre-trial arrests under PMLA. The judgment is anticipated to have significant implications on future enforcement actions under the PMLA, reinforcing the legal framework for protecting individual liberties.

 

Date of Decision: 3rd July 2024

Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement

Similar News