Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

Supreme Court Acquits Two in Large-Scale Rioting Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court has acquitted two accused in a case of large-scale rioting due to inconsistent and unreliable evidence. The accused were facing charges under Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code for their alleged involvement in a rioting incident that resulted in the death of one person and injuries to several others.

The Court observed that the prosecution failed to examine a crucial witness during the investigation and did not produce any explanation for the same. The testimony of the injured witness, upon whom much reliance was placed, was also found to be inconsistent and unreliable. The Court further noted that the lower courts failed to apply their mind to various aspects of the case and, therefore, granted the benefit of doubt to the accused.

The Court, in its verdict, emphasized that the quality of evidence is more important than the quantity of evidence and that the identification of an accused can be established by a single reliable witness. However, in cases of large-scale rioting with multiple offenders and victims, the Court suggested that it is prudent to insist on at least two reliable witnesses to vouchsafe the identification of an accused as a participant in the rioting.

The verdict was delivered by a bench of Justices B. R. Gavai and M. M. Sundresh on January 12, 2023, and the appeals were allowed.

Ranvir Singh etc. etc. vs  The State of Madhya

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/12-Jan-2023-Ranvir-vs-State-Crim-Rep.pdf"]

Latest Legal News