Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court Possession Of 'Bhang' Not An Offence Under NDPS Act, Specific Definition Excludes It: Jharkhand High Court Acquits Man Trial Court Cannot Reject Request For Handwriting Expert Merely Because Signatures Are On Photocopies: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Acquits Two in Large-Scale Rioting Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court has acquitted two accused in a case of large-scale rioting due to inconsistent and unreliable evidence. The accused were facing charges under Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code for their alleged involvement in a rioting incident that resulted in the death of one person and injuries to several others.

The Court observed that the prosecution failed to examine a crucial witness during the investigation and did not produce any explanation for the same. The testimony of the injured witness, upon whom much reliance was placed, was also found to be inconsistent and unreliable. The Court further noted that the lower courts failed to apply their mind to various aspects of the case and, therefore, granted the benefit of doubt to the accused.

The Court, in its verdict, emphasized that the quality of evidence is more important than the quantity of evidence and that the identification of an accused can be established by a single reliable witness. However, in cases of large-scale rioting with multiple offenders and victims, the Court suggested that it is prudent to insist on at least two reliable witnesses to vouchsafe the identification of an accused as a participant in the rioting.

The verdict was delivered by a bench of Justices B. R. Gavai and M. M. Sundresh on January 12, 2023, and the appeals were allowed.

Ranvir Singh etc. etc. vs  The State of Madhya

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/12-Jan-2023-Ranvir-vs-State-Crim-Rep.pdf"]

Latest Legal News