"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

SEBI to probe Adani Group over share price decline – Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Supreme Court of India, while hearing petitions along with Vishal Tiwari Vs UOI & Oth. on dated 03/03/2023, related to the recent decline in the share price of Adani Group companies, directed SEBI to investigate whether there has been a violation of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules 1957, failure to disclose transactions with related parties and relevant information, and manipulation of stock prices. SEBI was directed to conclude the investigation within two months and submit a status report.

Multiple petitions were filed related to the recent decline in the share price of Adani Group companies, which was triggered by a report by Hindenburg Research alleging violations of securities laws by the Adani Group. The petitions seek various directions and investigations related to the alleged violations and their impact on public institutions like SBI and LIC.

WP(C) No. 162 of 2023 seeks a committee headed by a retired judge to investigate the Hindenburg Research report.

WP(Crl) No. 39 of 2023 seeks an FIR against the founder of Hindenburg Research and associates for short selling and recovery of profits for investors.

WP(C) No. 201 of 2023 seeks an investigation by a Special Investigation Team or the CBI into allegations of fraud and the role of top officials of public sector banks and lender institutions.

WP(Crl) No. 57 of 2023 seeks investigations into Adani Group companies and the role of LIC and SBI under the supervision of a sitting judge.

In its order dated 10 February 2023, the Supreme Court of India noted the need to review existing regulatory mechanisms in the financial sector to protect Indian investors from market volatility. The Solicitor General was asked to seek instructions from the Union of India on the constitution and remit of an expert committee.

During the hearing, Mr. Prashant Bhushan and Mr. Tushar Mehta, representing the petitioners and the Union of India respectively, suggested the remit of the expert committee to be constituted. SEBI also provided a brief on existing statutory regimes, regulatory mechanisms, and frameworks for investor protection.

The Court directed SEBI to investigate whether there has been a violation of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules 1957, failure to disclose transactions with related parties and relevant information, and manipulation of stock prices. SEBI was directed to conclude the investigation within two months and submit a status report.

The Court also constituted an expert committee headed by Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre, consisting of five members, to assess the regulatory framework and suggest measures to strengthen it. The committee was requested to investigate the causal factors leading to market volatility and suggest measures to strengthen investor awareness, secure compliance, and strengthen the statutory and regulatory framework.

All agencies of the Union Government were requested to cooperate with the committee, and expenses related to the committee's work were to be borne by the Union Government. The committee was requested to submit its report to the Court within two months in a sealed cover.

Vishal Tiwari Vs UOI & Oth.

 

Similar News