Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court Contempt | Power to Punish Carries Within It the Power to Forgive: Supreme Court Sets Aside Jail Term for Director Who Criticised Judges Over Stray Dog Orders Seizure and Attachment Are Not Twins: Supreme Court Holds Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts in PC Act Cases Using CrPC Section 102 IBC | Pre-Existing Dispute Must Be Real, Not Moonshine: Supreme Court Restores Insolvency Proceedings, Says Admission Cannot Be Rejected Based on Spurious Defence Summons Under FEMA Are Civil in Nature – Section 160 CrPC Has No Role to Play: Delhi High Court Denies Exemption to Woman Petitioner from Personal Appearance Before ED Clear Admission in Ledger Is Sufficient for Summary Judgment: Delhi High Court Decrees ₹16.77 Cr in Favour of MSME Supplier Mere Allegation Under SC/ST Act Doesn’t Bar Bail When No Public Abuse Is Made Out: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Caste Atrocity Case Consent Of Girl Aged Above 16 Is Legally Valid Under Pre-2013 Law: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Rape Conviction Insurer Entitled to Recover Compensation from Owner When Driver Has No Licence or Fake Licence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Applies ‘Pay and Recover’ Doctrine Courts Cannot Rewrite Contracts Where Parties Have Failed to Clearly Define Property Terms: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Even Illegal Appointments Cannot Be Cancelled Without Hearing: Patna High Court Quashes Mass Termination Of Absorbed University Staff Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’

SEBI to probe Adani Group over share price decline – Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Supreme Court of India, while hearing petitions along with Vishal Tiwari Vs UOI & Oth. on dated 03/03/2023, related to the recent decline in the share price of Adani Group companies, directed SEBI to investigate whether there has been a violation of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules 1957, failure to disclose transactions with related parties and relevant information, and manipulation of stock prices. SEBI was directed to conclude the investigation within two months and submit a status report.

Multiple petitions were filed related to the recent decline in the share price of Adani Group companies, which was triggered by a report by Hindenburg Research alleging violations of securities laws by the Adani Group. The petitions seek various directions and investigations related to the alleged violations and their impact on public institutions like SBI and LIC.

WP(C) No. 162 of 2023 seeks a committee headed by a retired judge to investigate the Hindenburg Research report.

WP(Crl) No. 39 of 2023 seeks an FIR against the founder of Hindenburg Research and associates for short selling and recovery of profits for investors.

WP(C) No. 201 of 2023 seeks an investigation by a Special Investigation Team or the CBI into allegations of fraud and the role of top officials of public sector banks and lender institutions.

WP(Crl) No. 57 of 2023 seeks investigations into Adani Group companies and the role of LIC and SBI under the supervision of a sitting judge.

In its order dated 10 February 2023, the Supreme Court of India noted the need to review existing regulatory mechanisms in the financial sector to protect Indian investors from market volatility. The Solicitor General was asked to seek instructions from the Union of India on the constitution and remit of an expert committee.

During the hearing, Mr. Prashant Bhushan and Mr. Tushar Mehta, representing the petitioners and the Union of India respectively, suggested the remit of the expert committee to be constituted. SEBI also provided a brief on existing statutory regimes, regulatory mechanisms, and frameworks for investor protection.

The Court directed SEBI to investigate whether there has been a violation of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules 1957, failure to disclose transactions with related parties and relevant information, and manipulation of stock prices. SEBI was directed to conclude the investigation within two months and submit a status report.

The Court also constituted an expert committee headed by Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre, consisting of five members, to assess the regulatory framework and suggest measures to strengthen it. The committee was requested to investigate the causal factors leading to market volatility and suggest measures to strengthen investor awareness, secure compliance, and strengthen the statutory and regulatory framework.

All agencies of the Union Government were requested to cooperate with the committee, and expenses related to the committee's work were to be borne by the Union Government. The committee was requested to submit its report to the Court within two months in a sealed cover.

Vishal Tiwari Vs UOI & Oth.

 

Latest Legal News