High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

SEBI to probe Adani Group over share price decline – Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Supreme Court of India, while hearing petitions along with Vishal Tiwari Vs UOI & Oth. on dated 03/03/2023, related to the recent decline in the share price of Adani Group companies, directed SEBI to investigate whether there has been a violation of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules 1957, failure to disclose transactions with related parties and relevant information, and manipulation of stock prices. SEBI was directed to conclude the investigation within two months and submit a status report.

Multiple petitions were filed related to the recent decline in the share price of Adani Group companies, which was triggered by a report by Hindenburg Research alleging violations of securities laws by the Adani Group. The petitions seek various directions and investigations related to the alleged violations and their impact on public institutions like SBI and LIC.

WP(C) No. 162 of 2023 seeks a committee headed by a retired judge to investigate the Hindenburg Research report.

WP(Crl) No. 39 of 2023 seeks an FIR against the founder of Hindenburg Research and associates for short selling and recovery of profits for investors.

WP(C) No. 201 of 2023 seeks an investigation by a Special Investigation Team or the CBI into allegations of fraud and the role of top officials of public sector banks and lender institutions.

WP(Crl) No. 57 of 2023 seeks investigations into Adani Group companies and the role of LIC and SBI under the supervision of a sitting judge.

In its order dated 10 February 2023, the Supreme Court of India noted the need to review existing regulatory mechanisms in the financial sector to protect Indian investors from market volatility. The Solicitor General was asked to seek instructions from the Union of India on the constitution and remit of an expert committee.

During the hearing, Mr. Prashant Bhushan and Mr. Tushar Mehta, representing the petitioners and the Union of India respectively, suggested the remit of the expert committee to be constituted. SEBI also provided a brief on existing statutory regimes, regulatory mechanisms, and frameworks for investor protection.

The Court directed SEBI to investigate whether there has been a violation of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules 1957, failure to disclose transactions with related parties and relevant information, and manipulation of stock prices. SEBI was directed to conclude the investigation within two months and submit a status report.

The Court also constituted an expert committee headed by Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre, consisting of five members, to assess the regulatory framework and suggest measures to strengthen it. The committee was requested to investigate the causal factors leading to market volatility and suggest measures to strengthen investor awareness, secure compliance, and strengthen the statutory and regulatory framework.

All agencies of the Union Government were requested to cooperate with the committee, and expenses related to the committee's work were to be borne by the Union Government. The committee was requested to submit its report to the Court within two months in a sealed cover.

Vishal Tiwari Vs UOI & Oth.

 

Latest Legal News