Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

SEBI to probe Adani Group over share price decline – Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Supreme Court of India, while hearing petitions along with Vishal Tiwari Vs UOI & Oth. on dated 03/03/2023, related to the recent decline in the share price of Adani Group companies, directed SEBI to investigate whether there has been a violation of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules 1957, failure to disclose transactions with related parties and relevant information, and manipulation of stock prices. SEBI was directed to conclude the investigation within two months and submit a status report.

Multiple petitions were filed related to the recent decline in the share price of Adani Group companies, which was triggered by a report by Hindenburg Research alleging violations of securities laws by the Adani Group. The petitions seek various directions and investigations related to the alleged violations and their impact on public institutions like SBI and LIC.

WP(C) No. 162 of 2023 seeks a committee headed by a retired judge to investigate the Hindenburg Research report.

WP(Crl) No. 39 of 2023 seeks an FIR against the founder of Hindenburg Research and associates for short selling and recovery of profits for investors.

WP(C) No. 201 of 2023 seeks an investigation by a Special Investigation Team or the CBI into allegations of fraud and the role of top officials of public sector banks and lender institutions.

WP(Crl) No. 57 of 2023 seeks investigations into Adani Group companies and the role of LIC and SBI under the supervision of a sitting judge.

In its order dated 10 February 2023, the Supreme Court of India noted the need to review existing regulatory mechanisms in the financial sector to protect Indian investors from market volatility. The Solicitor General was asked to seek instructions from the Union of India on the constitution and remit of an expert committee.

During the hearing, Mr. Prashant Bhushan and Mr. Tushar Mehta, representing the petitioners and the Union of India respectively, suggested the remit of the expert committee to be constituted. SEBI also provided a brief on existing statutory regimes, regulatory mechanisms, and frameworks for investor protection.

The Court directed SEBI to investigate whether there has been a violation of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules 1957, failure to disclose transactions with related parties and relevant information, and manipulation of stock prices. SEBI was directed to conclude the investigation within two months and submit a status report.

The Court also constituted an expert committee headed by Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre, consisting of five members, to assess the regulatory framework and suggest measures to strengthen it. The committee was requested to investigate the causal factors leading to market volatility and suggest measures to strengthen investor awareness, secure compliance, and strengthen the statutory and regulatory framework.

All agencies of the Union Government were requested to cooperate with the committee, and expenses related to the committee's work were to be borne by the Union Government. The committee was requested to submit its report to the Court within two months in a sealed cover.

Vishal Tiwari Vs UOI & Oth.

 

Latest Legal News