"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Right to Employment Cannot Be Hampered by Delays in Issuing Police Clearance Certificates: Andhra Pardesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has directed the Superintendent of Police to issue a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) to Illa Rakesh Roshan, enabling him to travel to Brazil for employment. This decision comes despite a pending criminal case, provided that there is no adverse information against the petitioner beyond the existing charges. Justice Nyapathy Vijay presided over the case, emphasizing the petitioner’s right to employment while balancing the needs of the judicial process.

Illa Rakesh Roshan, a B.Tech graduate working with Accenture Solutions Pvt. Ltd. In Hyderabad, secured an opportunity to work in Brazil. To obtain a visa, Roshan needed a PCC. However, a criminal case registered against him under FIR.No.61/2019 for offenses under Sections 324, 323, and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) caused delays in the issuance of the PCC.

Roshan had previously sought intervention from the court to expedite his passport issuance, leading to a directive from the trial court to provide a No Objection Certificate (NOC), which was granted on March 4, 2024. Despite this, the PCC required for his visa application remained pending.

Justice Vijay underscored the importance of the petitioner’s right to seek employment opportunities abroad. The court acknowledged that undue delays in administrative processes could unjustly hinder an individual’s professional prospects. “The delay in issuance of Police Clearance Certificate is unwarranted,” the court noted, recognizing that the petitioner had already obtained a NOC from the trial court.

The State’s counsel expressed concerns that permitting Roshan to travel abroad might delay the criminal trial. Addressing this, the court required Roshan to provide an undertaking ensuring his availability during the trial proceedings. “The petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the respondent No.3 to make himself available at the time of trial of the criminal case,” the order stated.

The High Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the Superintendent of Police to issue the PCC within one week, provided no additional adverse information was found against Roshan beyond the mentioned criminal case. This ruling sets a precedent that balances an individual’s right to pursue employment opportunities with the necessity of participating in ongoing judicial processes.

The decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court reflects a judicial approach that safeguards the professional rights of individuals while ensuring compliance with legal obligations. By mandating the issuance of the PCC and requiring an undertaking from the petitioner, the court has provided a clear framework for similar cases in the future, where professional opportunities might be at stake due to pending legal issues.

This ruling is anticipated to have a significant impact on how administrative authorities handle PCC applications for individuals facing criminal charges, emphasizing the need for a balanced and expedited process.

 

Date of Decision: June 13, 2024

Illa Rakesh Roshan vs. The Union of India and Others

 

Similar News