MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Right to Employment Cannot Be Hampered by Delays in Issuing Police Clearance Certificates: Andhra Pardesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has directed the Superintendent of Police to issue a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) to Illa Rakesh Roshan, enabling him to travel to Brazil for employment. This decision comes despite a pending criminal case, provided that there is no adverse information against the petitioner beyond the existing charges. Justice Nyapathy Vijay presided over the case, emphasizing the petitioner’s right to employment while balancing the needs of the judicial process.

Illa Rakesh Roshan, a B.Tech graduate working with Accenture Solutions Pvt. Ltd. In Hyderabad, secured an opportunity to work in Brazil. To obtain a visa, Roshan needed a PCC. However, a criminal case registered against him under FIR.No.61/2019 for offenses under Sections 324, 323, and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) caused delays in the issuance of the PCC.

Roshan had previously sought intervention from the court to expedite his passport issuance, leading to a directive from the trial court to provide a No Objection Certificate (NOC), which was granted on March 4, 2024. Despite this, the PCC required for his visa application remained pending.

Justice Vijay underscored the importance of the petitioner’s right to seek employment opportunities abroad. The court acknowledged that undue delays in administrative processes could unjustly hinder an individual’s professional prospects. “The delay in issuance of Police Clearance Certificate is unwarranted,” the court noted, recognizing that the petitioner had already obtained a NOC from the trial court.

The State’s counsel expressed concerns that permitting Roshan to travel abroad might delay the criminal trial. Addressing this, the court required Roshan to provide an undertaking ensuring his availability during the trial proceedings. “The petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the respondent No.3 to make himself available at the time of trial of the criminal case,” the order stated.

The High Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the Superintendent of Police to issue the PCC within one week, provided no additional adverse information was found against Roshan beyond the mentioned criminal case. This ruling sets a precedent that balances an individual’s right to pursue employment opportunities with the necessity of participating in ongoing judicial processes.

The decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court reflects a judicial approach that safeguards the professional rights of individuals while ensuring compliance with legal obligations. By mandating the issuance of the PCC and requiring an undertaking from the petitioner, the court has provided a clear framework for similar cases in the future, where professional opportunities might be at stake due to pending legal issues.

This ruling is anticipated to have a significant impact on how administrative authorities handle PCC applications for individuals facing criminal charges, emphasizing the need for a balanced and expedited process.

 

Date of Decision: June 13, 2024

Illa Rakesh Roshan vs. The Union of India and Others

 

Latest Legal News