Or. 6 Rule 17 CPC | A Suit Cannot be Converted into a Fresh Litigation – Amendment Cannot Introduce a New Cause of Action: Andhra Pradesh High Court Government Cannot Withhold Retirement Without Formal Rejection Before Notice Period Expires: Delhi High Court Drug Offences Threaten Society, Courts Must Show Zero Tolerance : Meghalaya High Court Refuses Bail Under Section 37 NDPS Act Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to Serious Allegations, Unless Justified by Law: Kerala High Court When Law Prescribes a Limitation, Courts Cannot Ignore It: Supreme Court Quashes Time-Barred Prosecution Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act Issuing Notices to a Non-Existent Entity is a Substantive Illegality, Not a Mere Procedural Lapse: Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Notices Termination Without Verifying Evidence is Legally Unsustainable: Allahabad High Court Reinstates Government Counsel Luxury for One Cannot Mean Struggle for the Other - Husband’s True Income Cannot Be Suppressed to Deny Fair Maintenance: Calcutta High Court Penalty Proceedings Must Be Initiated and Concluded Within The Prescribed Timeline Under Section 275(1)(C): Karnataka High Court Upholds ITAT Order" Landlord Entitled to Recovery of Possession, Arrears of Rent, and Damages for Unauthorized Occupation: Madras High Court Supreme Court Slams Punjab and Haryana High Court for Illegally Reversing Acquittal in Murder Case, Orders ₹5 Lakh Compensation for Wrongful Conviction Mere Absence of Wholesale License Does Not Make a Transaction Unlawful:  Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against INOX Air Products Stigmatic Dismissal Without Inquiry Violates Fair Process, Rules High Court in Employment Case Recruiting Authorities Have Discretion to Fix Cut-Off Marks – No Arbitrariness Found: Orissa High Court Charge-Sheet Is Not a Punishment, Courts Should Not Interfere: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Writ Against Departmental Inquiry Injunction Cannot Be Granted Without Identifiable Property or Evidence of Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Fairness Demands Compensation Under the 2013 Act; Bureaucratic Delays Cannot Defeat Justice: Supreme Court Competition Commission Must Issue Notice to Both Parties in a Combination Approval: Supreme Court Physical Possession and Settled Possession Are Prerequisites for Section 6 Relief: Delhi High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Decision Granting Possession Hyper-Technical Approach Must Be Avoided in Pre-Trial Amendments: Punjab & Haryana High Court FIR Lodged After Restitution of Conjugal Rights Suit Appears Retaliatory: Calcutta High Court Quashes Domestic Violence Case Two-Year Immunity from No-Confidence Motion Applies to Every Elected Sarpanch, Not Just the First in Office: Bombay High Court Enforcing The Terms Of  Agreement Does Not Amount To Contempt Of Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Contempt Order Against Power Company Officers Consent of a minor is immaterial under law: Allahabad High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Man Accused of Enticing Minor Sister-in-Law and Dowry Harassment False Promise of Marriage Does Not Automatically Amount to Rape: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Under Section 376 IPC Dowry Harassment Cannot Be Ignored, But Justice Must Be Fair: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 498A IPC, Modifies Sentence to Time Served with Compensation of ₹3 Lakh Mere Presence in a Crime Scene Insufficient to Prove Common Intention – Presence Not Automatically Establish Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC: Supreme Court: Compensation Must Ensure Financial Stability—Not Be Subject to Arbitrary Reductions: Supreme Court Slams Arbitrary Reduction of Motor Accident Compensation by High Court

Right to Employment Cannot Be Hampered by Delays in Issuing Police Clearance Certificates: Andhra Pardesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has directed the Superintendent of Police to issue a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) to Illa Rakesh Roshan, enabling him to travel to Brazil for employment. This decision comes despite a pending criminal case, provided that there is no adverse information against the petitioner beyond the existing charges. Justice Nyapathy Vijay presided over the case, emphasizing the petitioner’s right to employment while balancing the needs of the judicial process.

Illa Rakesh Roshan, a B.Tech graduate working with Accenture Solutions Pvt. Ltd. In Hyderabad, secured an opportunity to work in Brazil. To obtain a visa, Roshan needed a PCC. However, a criminal case registered against him under FIR.No.61/2019 for offenses under Sections 324, 323, and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) caused delays in the issuance of the PCC.

Roshan had previously sought intervention from the court to expedite his passport issuance, leading to a directive from the trial court to provide a No Objection Certificate (NOC), which was granted on March 4, 2024. Despite this, the PCC required for his visa application remained pending.

Justice Vijay underscored the importance of the petitioner’s right to seek employment opportunities abroad. The court acknowledged that undue delays in administrative processes could unjustly hinder an individual’s professional prospects. “The delay in issuance of Police Clearance Certificate is unwarranted,” the court noted, recognizing that the petitioner had already obtained a NOC from the trial court.

The State’s counsel expressed concerns that permitting Roshan to travel abroad might delay the criminal trial. Addressing this, the court required Roshan to provide an undertaking ensuring his availability during the trial proceedings. “The petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the respondent No.3 to make himself available at the time of trial of the criminal case,” the order stated.

The High Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the Superintendent of Police to issue the PCC within one week, provided no additional adverse information was found against Roshan beyond the mentioned criminal case. This ruling sets a precedent that balances an individual’s right to pursue employment opportunities with the necessity of participating in ongoing judicial processes.

The decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court reflects a judicial approach that safeguards the professional rights of individuals while ensuring compliance with legal obligations. By mandating the issuance of the PCC and requiring an undertaking from the petitioner, the court has provided a clear framework for similar cases in the future, where professional opportunities might be at stake due to pending legal issues.

This ruling is anticipated to have a significant impact on how administrative authorities handle PCC applications for individuals facing criminal charges, emphasizing the need for a balanced and expedited process.

 

Date of Decision: June 13, 2024

Illa Rakesh Roshan vs. The Union of India and Others

 

Similar News