Limitation For Executing Partition Decree Not Suspended Till Engrossment; Right To Seek Engrossment Subsists During 12-Year Execution Period: Allahabad HC Unilateral Revocation Of Registered Gift Deed Through Sub-Registrar Is Void, Donor Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mediation Cannot Be Forced Upon Unwilling Party In Civil Suits; Consent Of Both Sides Essential: Bombay High Court Unmarried Daughter Not Entitled To Freedom Fighter Pension If Gainfully Employed At Time Of Father's Death: Calcutta High Court Section 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Denied For Lack Of Formal Divorce From First Marriage: Delhi High Court ONGC Cannot Demand Security From Award Holder After Giving ‘No Objection’ To Withdrawal Of Deposited Amount: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sedative Drugs Like Tramadol Impact Mental Fitness Of Declarant; Bombay High Court Acquits Man Relying On Doubtful Dying Declarations Postal Tracking Report Showing 'Refusal' Not Conclusive Proof Of Service If Denied On Oath: Delhi High Court Encroachments Near Military Installations Pose National Security Threat; Remove Illegal Constructions Within Three Months: Rajasthan High Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs State To Decide On Legality Of Charging Fees For Downloading FIRs From 'SAANJH' Portal Wife’s Educational Qualifications No Bar To Seeking Maintenance If Actual Employment Is Not Proven: Orissa High Court Mere Telephonic Contact Without Substance Of Conversation Cannot Establish Criminal Conspiracy: Madhya Pradesh High Court Serious Allegations Like HIV/AIDS Imputations Require Corroboration, Cannot Rest Solely On Unsubstantiated Testimony: Karnataka High Court Family Court Cannot Refuse Mutual Consent Divorce Merely Because Parties Are Living Separately 'Without Valid Reason': Kerala High Court Collective Attempts By Advocates To Overbear Presiding Officer Not Protected Professional Conduct: Madras High Court Dismisses Quash Petitions No Legal Evidence Required To Forward A Person To Trial? Rajasthan HC Slams Police For Implicating Accused In NDPS Case Solely On Co-Accused's Statement Accused Must Be Physically Present In Court To Furnish Bonds Under Section 91 BNSS: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Right to Employment Cannot Be Hampered by Delays in Issuing Police Clearance Certificates: Andhra Pardesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has directed the Superintendent of Police to issue a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) to Illa Rakesh Roshan, enabling him to travel to Brazil for employment. This decision comes despite a pending criminal case, provided that there is no adverse information against the petitioner beyond the existing charges. Justice Nyapathy Vijay presided over the case, emphasizing the petitioner’s right to employment while balancing the needs of the judicial process.

Illa Rakesh Roshan, a B.Tech graduate working with Accenture Solutions Pvt. Ltd. In Hyderabad, secured an opportunity to work in Brazil. To obtain a visa, Roshan needed a PCC. However, a criminal case registered against him under FIR.No.61/2019 for offenses under Sections 324, 323, and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) caused delays in the issuance of the PCC.

Roshan had previously sought intervention from the court to expedite his passport issuance, leading to a directive from the trial court to provide a No Objection Certificate (NOC), which was granted on March 4, 2024. Despite this, the PCC required for his visa application remained pending.

Justice Vijay underscored the importance of the petitioner’s right to seek employment opportunities abroad. The court acknowledged that undue delays in administrative processes could unjustly hinder an individual’s professional prospects. “The delay in issuance of Police Clearance Certificate is unwarranted,” the court noted, recognizing that the petitioner had already obtained a NOC from the trial court.

The State’s counsel expressed concerns that permitting Roshan to travel abroad might delay the criminal trial. Addressing this, the court required Roshan to provide an undertaking ensuring his availability during the trial proceedings. “The petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the respondent No.3 to make himself available at the time of trial of the criminal case,” the order stated.

The High Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the Superintendent of Police to issue the PCC within one week, provided no additional adverse information was found against Roshan beyond the mentioned criminal case. This ruling sets a precedent that balances an individual’s right to pursue employment opportunities with the necessity of participating in ongoing judicial processes.

The decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court reflects a judicial approach that safeguards the professional rights of individuals while ensuring compliance with legal obligations. By mandating the issuance of the PCC and requiring an undertaking from the petitioner, the court has provided a clear framework for similar cases in the future, where professional opportunities might be at stake due to pending legal issues.

This ruling is anticipated to have a significant impact on how administrative authorities handle PCC applications for individuals facing criminal charges, emphasizing the need for a balanced and expedited process.

 

Date of Decision: June 13, 2024

Illa Rakesh Roshan vs. The Union of India and Others

 

Latest Legal News