Married Daughter Cannot Be Excluded From Compassionate Appointment Solely On The Ground Of Marriage: Chhattisgarh High Court Allahabad HC Condemns Lawyers Seeking Adjournments To Attend District Courts Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked For Restoration Of Possession When Statutory Remedy Of Restitution Exists: Calcutta High Court Invoke Preventive Detention Laws Against Sand Mining Kingpins: Supreme Court Directs ED Probe To Protect Chambal Sanctuary Res Judicata Bars Pendente Lite Purchaser From Re-Agitating Impleadment Under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC If Rejected Under Order I Rule 10: Supreme Court Consumer Complaints Can Continue Against Promoters & Co-Developers Even If Corporate Debtor Is Under IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court IBC Moratorium Protects Only Corporate Debtor, Does Not Bar Consumer Complaints Against Promoters & Directors: Supreme Court Vehicle Registration Certificate Relevant But Not Conclusive For Deciding Interim Custody Under Section 451 CrPC: Supreme Court Lawyer Has No Unqualified Right To Continuous Presence During Entire Interrogation Under Section 38 BNSS: Supreme Court Mandating Continuous Videography Of Accused During Transit Is Unworkable, May Lead To Unfounded Allegations: Supreme Court Centre Introduces FCRA Amendment Bill 2026: Proposes Vesting Of Defunct NGO Assets In 'Designated Authority', Mandates Prior Nod For Probe Written Communication Of Grounds Of Arrest Not Mandatory For Arrests Prior To SC's 'Mihir Rajesh Shah' Judgment: Orissa High Court Passing Ex-Parte Maintenance Order Without Verifying Status Of WhatsApp Or Email Notice Violates Natural Justice: Madhya Pradesh High Court Training ChatGPT On Copyrighted News Is 'Fair Dealing', Does Not Amount To Infringement: Delhi High Court Refuses To Enjoin OpenAI Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rethinking Access to Justice: Proposing a Client-Choice Bar-Integrated Model as a Viable Alternative to the LADC System Delhi Police Grants Permission To Advocates To Protest At Jantar Mantar On August 7 Over LADC Concerns Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Right to Employment Cannot Be Hampered by Delays in Issuing Police Clearance Certificates: Andhra Pardesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has directed the Superintendent of Police to issue a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) to Illa Rakesh Roshan, enabling him to travel to Brazil for employment. This decision comes despite a pending criminal case, provided that there is no adverse information against the petitioner beyond the existing charges. Justice Nyapathy Vijay presided over the case, emphasizing the petitioner’s right to employment while balancing the needs of the judicial process.

Illa Rakesh Roshan, a B.Tech graduate working with Accenture Solutions Pvt. Ltd. In Hyderabad, secured an opportunity to work in Brazil. To obtain a visa, Roshan needed a PCC. However, a criminal case registered against him under FIR.No.61/2019 for offenses under Sections 324, 323, and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) caused delays in the issuance of the PCC.

Roshan had previously sought intervention from the court to expedite his passport issuance, leading to a directive from the trial court to provide a No Objection Certificate (NOC), which was granted on March 4, 2024. Despite this, the PCC required for his visa application remained pending.

Justice Vijay underscored the importance of the petitioner’s right to seek employment opportunities abroad. The court acknowledged that undue delays in administrative processes could unjustly hinder an individual’s professional prospects. “The delay in issuance of Police Clearance Certificate is unwarranted,” the court noted, recognizing that the petitioner had already obtained a NOC from the trial court.

The State’s counsel expressed concerns that permitting Roshan to travel abroad might delay the criminal trial. Addressing this, the court required Roshan to provide an undertaking ensuring his availability during the trial proceedings. “The petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the respondent No.3 to make himself available at the time of trial of the criminal case,” the order stated.

The High Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the Superintendent of Police to issue the PCC within one week, provided no additional adverse information was found against Roshan beyond the mentioned criminal case. This ruling sets a precedent that balances an individual’s right to pursue employment opportunities with the necessity of participating in ongoing judicial processes.

The decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court reflects a judicial approach that safeguards the professional rights of individuals while ensuring compliance with legal obligations. By mandating the issuance of the PCC and requiring an undertaking from the petitioner, the court has provided a clear framework for similar cases in the future, where professional opportunities might be at stake due to pending legal issues.

This ruling is anticipated to have a significant impact on how administrative authorities handle PCC applications for individuals facing criminal charges, emphasizing the need for a balanced and expedited process.

 

Date of Decision: June 13, 2024

Illa Rakesh Roshan vs. The Union of India and Others

 

Latest Legal News