Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Right of State to Withdraw and Re-Advertise Jobs: High Court of J&K Dismisses Petition Against Re-Advertisement of Dental Technician Post

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that clarifies the legal stance on the withdrawal and re-advertisement of government job vacancies, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar dismissed a writ petition challenging the re-advertisement of a Dental Technician position in Ganderbal district under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM).

The petitioner, Abdul Majid Ganai, a dental sciences diploma holder, had contested the legitimacy of the fresh advertisement dated 20.12.2013, which replaced an earlier notice from 13.10.2013. Ganai argued that the new advertisement was an attempt to favor certain candidates and excluded him unfairly from the selection process.

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, in his judgment dated November 18, 2023, stated, "a candidate has no unfettered right to challenge the action of the State or any other authority, whereby, an advertisement notice has been withdrawn or the posts have been re-advertised." This observation came after an extensive legal analysis, referencing several landmark Supreme Court judgments.

Justice Nargal further elucidated, "no vested right of selection/appointment is created in favour of the petitioner, merely because he participated in the selection process." The court held that the re-advertisement notice did not infringe any fundamental, legal, or statutory rights of the petitioner, hence validating the respondents' actions as legally sound.

Respondents in the case, including the State of J&K and Director Health Services, contended that the re-advertisement was aligned with the updated guidelines from the J&K State Health Society and NRHM. They maintained that the petitioner, and all eligible candidates, were free to participate in the new selection process, negating any notion of prejudice or legal infirmity.

The decision reinforces the principle that government authorities retain the right to withdraw and re-advertise job posts, subject to adherence to legal and procedural norms. The court's verdict, dismissing the petition along with all connected applications, is seen as a precedent-setting judgment, clarifying the legal framework governing state actions in matters of public employment.

Date of Decision: 18th November 2023

Abdul Majid Ganai VS State of J&K, Director Health Services

Latest Legal News