Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Right of State to Withdraw and Re-Advertise Jobs: High Court of J&K Dismisses Petition Against Re-Advertisement of Dental Technician Post

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that clarifies the legal stance on the withdrawal and re-advertisement of government job vacancies, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar dismissed a writ petition challenging the re-advertisement of a Dental Technician position in Ganderbal district under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM).

The petitioner, Abdul Majid Ganai, a dental sciences diploma holder, had contested the legitimacy of the fresh advertisement dated 20.12.2013, which replaced an earlier notice from 13.10.2013. Ganai argued that the new advertisement was an attempt to favor certain candidates and excluded him unfairly from the selection process.

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, in his judgment dated November 18, 2023, stated, "a candidate has no unfettered right to challenge the action of the State or any other authority, whereby, an advertisement notice has been withdrawn or the posts have been re-advertised." This observation came after an extensive legal analysis, referencing several landmark Supreme Court judgments.

Justice Nargal further elucidated, "no vested right of selection/appointment is created in favour of the petitioner, merely because he participated in the selection process." The court held that the re-advertisement notice did not infringe any fundamental, legal, or statutory rights of the petitioner, hence validating the respondents' actions as legally sound.

Respondents in the case, including the State of J&K and Director Health Services, contended that the re-advertisement was aligned with the updated guidelines from the J&K State Health Society and NRHM. They maintained that the petitioner, and all eligible candidates, were free to participate in the new selection process, negating any notion of prejudice or legal infirmity.

The decision reinforces the principle that government authorities retain the right to withdraw and re-advertise job posts, subject to adherence to legal and procedural norms. The court's verdict, dismissing the petition along with all connected applications, is seen as a precedent-setting judgment, clarifying the legal framework governing state actions in matters of public employment.

Date of Decision: 18th November 2023

Abdul Majid Ganai VS State of J&K, Director Health Services

Latest Legal News