Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Delays in processing applications for premature release cannot deprive convicts of interim relief: Karnataka High Court Grants 90-Day Parole Listing All Appeals Arising From A Common Judgment Before The Same Bench Avoids Contradictory Rulings: Full Bench of the Patna High Court. Age Claims in Borderline Cases Demand Scrutiny: Madhya Pradesh HC on Juvenile Justice Act Bishop Garden Not Available for Partition Due to Legal Quietus on Declaration Suit: Madras High Court Exclusion of Certain Heirs Alone Does Not Make a Will Suspicious: Kerala High Court Upholds Validity of Will Proof of Delivery Was Never Requested, Nor Was it a Payment Precondition: Delhi High Court Held Courier Firm Entitled to Payment Despite Non-Delivery Allegations Widowed Daughter Eligible for Compassionate Appointment under BSNL Scheme: Allahabad High Court Brutality of an Offence Does Not Dispense With Legal Proof: Supreme Court Overturns Life Imprisonment of Two Accused Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son

Plaintiff’s Consent and Receipt of Compensation Nullify Right to Property Claim: Telangana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Partition Suit

01 November 2024 5:49 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Telangana High Court upheld the dismissal of a partition suit filed by M. Prema Latha. The court ruled that the plaintiff was not entitled to a share in her late father's property, as she had already acknowledged the existence of a valid Will and had accepted compensation in 2005. The plaintiff's failure to challenge the Will or the development agreement over two decades was seen as her tacit consent, disqualifying her from later seeking a share.
Prema Latha, the daughter of Jaligama Balaiah, filed a partition suit against her brothers, seeking her share in a property located in Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. She claimed a 1/6th share in the property, which had been divided among her four brothers based on a 1997 Will. The trial court dismissed the suit, leading to this appeal.
Plaintiff's Consent and Will Acknowledgment: The court noted that Prema Latha had signed the development agreement in 2005, acknowledging the Will that divided the property among her brothers and excluded her. The plaintiff also admitted to receiving compensation, which implied relinquishment of her rights.
Failure to Challenge Will and Development Agreement: The court emphasized that Prema Latha neither challenged the Will nor the development agreement for over 20 years. Her inaction and acceptance of compensation indicated her consent to the arrangement.
Lack of Evidence for Fraud or Forgery: The plaintiff argued that the first three pages of the Will were forged. However, she provided no evidence to substantiate this claim, and the court found the Will to be valid.
The Telangana High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court's decision that Prema Latha had no claim to the property. The court ruled that her actions and inaction over the years amounted to her relinquishment of any property rights.
This ruling underscores the importance of timely action and clear challenges when disputing Wills or property arrangements. It also highlights that accepting compensation can imply consent to relinquishing property rights, making later claims invalid.

Date of Decision: October 3, 2024
M. Prema Latha v. Jaligama Prakash & Others.

 

Similar News