TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Notional Extension of Employment Brings Accident During Medical Aid Within Employment Scope: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Kerala High Court on 9th April 2024, upheld the principles of notional extension of employment in the case of The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Radhakrishnan & Others. The court dismissed the appeal filed by The Oriental Insurance Company challenging the compensation awarded to a bus conductor who met with an accident while seeking medical aid for a condition experienced during his employment.

Legal Point of Judgment: The primary legal issue revolved around whether the bus conductor’s accident, which occurred while he was on his way to the hospital for a condition experienced during work, fell within the scope of his employment for the purposes of compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923.

Background: The bus conductor, employed by the 2nd respondent and later involving a bus owned by the 3rd respondent, suffered chest pain during his employment and subsequently met with an accident while traveling to the hospital. The Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation awarded him a compensation of Rs.1,13,736/-, which was challenged by the Oriental Insurance Company.

Transfer of Liability: The court referenced Section 157 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, noting that the liability of the insurance policy transfers with the ownership of the vehicle, as established in “Mallamma (Dead) by L.rs. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. And Others [(2014) 14 SCC 137]”.

Notional Extension of Employment: The court applied the principle of notional extension of employment, asserting that the journey to the hospital for medical aid falls within the scope of employment. This principle was supported by precedents such as “General Manager, B.E.S.T Undertaking, Bombay v. Mrs.Agnes [AIR 1964 SC 193]” and further cases.

Scope of Employment: The court found no impropriety in the Commissioner’s findings that the accident occurred in the course of the claimant’s employment, thereby justifying the compensation.

Decision: The appeal by The Oriental Insurance Company was dismissed, affirming the compensation to the bus conductor.

Date of Decision: 9th April 2024.

“The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Radhakrishnan & Others”,

Latest Legal News