Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

J&K High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Sets Aside ‘Manifestly Unjust’ Order, Stresses Code of Civil Procedure ‘Not a Penal Law to Punish’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has set aside an order from the Court of Special Mobile Magistrate, Anantnag, terming it ‘manifestly unjust.’ The petitioner, Mst. Raja, had invoked Article 227 of the Constitution, seeking to quash the original order dated 11.12.2015 related to a property dispute and alleged fraudulent compromise decree.

The High Court’s judgement, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani, emphasized that the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) exists to “facilitate justice” and is not a “penal law to punish a person.” Justice Wani stated, “It is settled law that provisions of Code of Civil Procedure are designated to facilitate justice… The Scheme of the code in essence is complete adjudication of the dispute between the parties and to do the full justice to the case.”

The case involved a long-standing property dispute, where Mst. Raja claimed she was deprived of her share in her father’s estate due to a fraudulent compromise decree. After several legal battles in lower courts, the High Court observed that the trial court’s dismissal of her application was “manifestly causing failure of justice,” thereby warranting the exercise of “Supervisory Jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution.”

The matter has been remanded back to the trial court for reconsideration in light of the High Court’s observations.

Date of Decision:  25.08.2023

Mst. Raja vs Mst. Fazi and Ors.      

Latest Legal News