Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

J&K High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Sets Aside ‘Manifestly Unjust’ Order, Stresses Code of Civil Procedure ‘Not a Penal Law to Punish’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has set aside an order from the Court of Special Mobile Magistrate, Anantnag, terming it ‘manifestly unjust.’ The petitioner, Mst. Raja, had invoked Article 227 of the Constitution, seeking to quash the original order dated 11.12.2015 related to a property dispute and alleged fraudulent compromise decree.

The High Court’s judgement, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani, emphasized that the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) exists to “facilitate justice” and is not a “penal law to punish a person.” Justice Wani stated, “It is settled law that provisions of Code of Civil Procedure are designated to facilitate justice… The Scheme of the code in essence is complete adjudication of the dispute between the parties and to do the full justice to the case.”

The case involved a long-standing property dispute, where Mst. Raja claimed she was deprived of her share in her father’s estate due to a fraudulent compromise decree. After several legal battles in lower courts, the High Court observed that the trial court’s dismissal of her application was “manifestly causing failure of justice,” thereby warranting the exercise of “Supervisory Jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution.”

The matter has been remanded back to the trial court for reconsideration in light of the High Court’s observations.

Date of Decision:  25.08.2023

Mst. Raja vs Mst. Fazi and Ors.      

Latest Legal News