Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

J&K High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Sets Aside ‘Manifestly Unjust’ Order, Stresses Code of Civil Procedure ‘Not a Penal Law to Punish’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has set aside an order from the Court of Special Mobile Magistrate, Anantnag, terming it ‘manifestly unjust.’ The petitioner, Mst. Raja, had invoked Article 227 of the Constitution, seeking to quash the original order dated 11.12.2015 related to a property dispute and alleged fraudulent compromise decree.

The High Court’s judgement, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani, emphasized that the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) exists to “facilitate justice” and is not a “penal law to punish a person.” Justice Wani stated, “It is settled law that provisions of Code of Civil Procedure are designated to facilitate justice… The Scheme of the code in essence is complete adjudication of the dispute between the parties and to do the full justice to the case.”

The case involved a long-standing property dispute, where Mst. Raja claimed she was deprived of her share in her father’s estate due to a fraudulent compromise decree. After several legal battles in lower courts, the High Court observed that the trial court’s dismissal of her application was “manifestly causing failure of justice,” thereby warranting the exercise of “Supervisory Jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution.”

The matter has been remanded back to the trial court for reconsideration in light of the High Court’s observations.

Date of Decision:  25.08.2023

Mst. Raja vs Mst. Fazi and Ors.      

Latest Legal News