Mere Allegations of Harassment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail to Wife in Matrimonial Suicide Case 'Convenience Of Wife Not A Thumb Rule, But Custody Of Minor Child Is A Weighing Aspect': Punjab & Haryana HC Transfers Divorce Case To Rohtak MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Cooperative Society Is A “Veritable Party” To Arbitration Clause In Flat Agreements, Temple Trust Entitled To Arbitrate As Non-Signatory: Bombay High Court State Government Cannot Review Its Own Revisional Orders Under Section 41(3): Allahabad High Court Affirms Legal Bar on Successive Reviews When Several Issues Arise, Courts Must Answer Each With Reasons: Supreme Court Automatic Retention Trumps Lessee Tag: Calcutta High Court Declares Saregama India ‘Raiyat’, Directs Reconsideration of Land Conversion Application Recovery of Valid Ticket Raises Presumption of Bona Fide Travel – Burden Shifts to Railways: Delhi High Court Restores Railway Accident Claim Failure to Frame Issue on Limitation Vitiates Award of Compensation Under Telegraph Act: Gauhati High Court Sets Aside Order, Remands Matter Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Heritable Right: Gujarat High Court Rejects 9-Year Delayed Claim, Orders Re-Issuance of ₹4 Lakh Compensation Court Cannot Rewrite Contracts to Suit Contractor’s Convenience: Kerala High Court Upholds Termination of Road Work Under Risk and Cost Clause Post-Bail Conduct Is Irrelevant in Appeal Against Grant of Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Crucial Distinction Between Appeal and Cancellation Granting Anticipatory Bail to a Long-Absconding Accused Makes a Mockery of the Judicial Process: Supreme Court Cracks Down on Pre-Arrest Bail in Murder Case Recognition as an Intangible Asset Does Not Confer Ownership: Supreme Court Draws a Sharp Line Between Accounting Entries and Property Rights IBC Cannot Be the Guiding Principle for Restructuring the Ownership and Control of Spectrum: Supreme Court Reasserts Public Trust Over Natural Resources Courts Cannot Convict First and Search for Law Later: Supreme Court Faults Prosecution for Ignoring Statutory Foundation in Cement Case When the Law Itself Stood Withdrawn, How Could Its Violation Survive?: Supreme Court Quashes 1994 Cement Conviction Under E.C. Act Ten Years Means Ten Years – Not a Day Less: Supreme Court Refuses to Dilute Statutory Experience Requirement for SET Exemption SET in Malayalam Cannot Qualify You to Teach Economics: Supreme Court Upholds Subject-Specific Eligibility for HSST Appointments Outsourcing Cannot Become A Tool To Defeat Regularization: Supreme Court On Perennial Nature Of Government Work Once Similarly Placed Workers Were Regularized, Denial to Others Is Discrimination: Supreme Court Directs Regularization of Income Tax Daily-Wage Workers Right To Form Association Is Protected — But Not A Right To Run It Free From Regulation: Supreme Court Recalibrates Article 19 In Sports Governance S. Nithya Cannot Be Transplanted Into Cricket: Supreme Court Shields District Cricket Bodies From Judicially Imposed Structural Overhaul Will | Propounder Must Dispel Every Suspicious Circumstance — Failure Is Fatal: : Punjab & Haryana High Court Electronic Evidence Authenticity Jeopardized by Unexplained Delay and Procedural Omissions: MP High Court Rejects Belated 65B Application Not Answering to the Questions of the IO Would Not Ipso Facto Mean There Is Non-Cooperation: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Undertaking to Satisfy Award Is Not Waiver of Appeal: Supreme Court Restores Insurer’s Statutory Right

Ignoring the Peculiar Circumstances of the Appellant Would Be Inequitable: Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Arvind Kejriwal Amid General Elections

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a notable judgment today, the Supreme Court of India granted interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, acknowledging the unique context of his political role during the ongoing Lok Sabha elections. The apex court, presided over by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, ruled that overlooking the “peculiar circumstances” surrounding Kejriwal would be “inequitable and wrong.”

Legal Background and Facts of the Case: Arvind Kejriwal was arrested on March 21, 2024, under allegations involving the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the Indian Penal Code, and the Prevention of Corruption Act. This arrest followed the registration of several charges by the Directorate of Enforcement and subsequent upholding by lower courts. Kejriwal’s legal team appealed to the Supreme Court challenging the validity of his arrest and seeking interim relief citing his pivotal role in the current general elections.

Court’s Analysis on Legal Points and Issues: The Supreme Court meticulously examined the provisions related to the grant of interim bail, citing several precedents affirming the judiciary’s authority to consider bail in extraordinary circumstances. The justices highlighted the ongoing general elections as a significant democratic process, rejecting the prosecution’s argument against preferential treatment for politicians. The court emphasized that special circumstances require special considerations, which in this case, justified the grant of interim bail.

Examination of Legal Provisions: Justice Khanna referred to the Mukesh Kishanpuria case, which supports the high court’s power to grant interim bail as part of constitutional rights under Article 21.

Peculiar Circumstances and Judicial Precedents: The court underscored previous rulings where interim releases were justified based on the peculiarities of each case, demonstrating the judiciary’s role in balancing legal standards with situational fairness.

Final Decision on Interim Bail: Kejriwal was granted bail until June 1, 2024, with strict conditions, including restrictions on accessing official premises and documents, emphasizing that this should not influence the ongoing legal proceedings regarding his arrest.

Case Title and Date of Decision: The case, titled “Arvind Kejriwal Versus Directorate of Enforcement,” was decided on May 10, 2024, marking a significant interim decision in the landscape of Indian legal proceedings involving high-profile political figures. The Supreme Court’s judgment not only addressed the immediate legalities of Kejriwal’s bail but also set a precedent on how judicial discretion can be applied in cases involving elected officials during critical democratic events.

Date of Decision: 10th May 2024

ARVIND KEJRIWAL VS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

Latest Legal News