Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Highly Qualified and Employed Wife Not Entitled to Maintenance: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a landmark decision, ruled that a highly qualified wife who is capable of earning and has not truthfully disclosed her employment status is not entitled to maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The judgment was delivered by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, and it was pronounced on September 12, 2023.

The appellant, Niharika Ghosh, had appealed against an order denying her maintenance, originally passed by the Principal Judge of Family Courts. Ghosh, who holds a Ph.D. in Management and has professional qualifications in Computers, claimed she was unemployed and sought maintenance from her husband, Shankar Ghosh.

The Court made several critical observations regarding the appellant's employment status and qualifications. "It is difficult to accept that a person who is so highly qualified would not be working and it is even more difficult to accept that she would be working for charity," the Court observed.

Another significant observation was regarding truthful disclosure. "A party’s failure to disclose true facts about employment can have a significant bearing on the adjudication for maintenance," stated the judgment.

The Court also cited previous judgments, including Mamta Jaiswal vs. Rajesh Jaiswal and Rupali Gupta vs. Rajat Gupta, to support its decision. These cases also declined maintenance to spouses with significant qualifications and earning capacities.

In light of the observations, Delhi High Court held , "We find that in the present case it is not only that the appellant is highly qualified and has an earning capacity, but in fact, she has been earning, though has not been inclined to truthfully disclose her true income." Accordingly, the Court dismissed the appeal, stating that a person with such qualifications and earning potential is not entitled to maintenance.

 Date of Decision: 12 September, 2023

XXX VS XXX

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/XXX_VS_XXX_12Sep23_DelHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News