Lethargy Is Not an Exceptional Circumstance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Striking Off of Defence for Delay in Filing Written Statement Vague Decree of Injunction Can’t Be Executed by Attaching Machines: Rajasthan High Court Strikes Down Execution Order Mere permission to join proceedings without allowing filing of written statement is illusory: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Proceedings Unregistered Power of Attorney Can’t Transfer Property: MP High Court Denies Title, Dismisses Ejectment Suit Mere Non-Recovery of Weapon Is Not Fatal When Circumstantial and Medical Evidence Prove Guilt Beyond Doubt: Allahabad High Court Failure to Examine Gazetted Officer and Magistrate Who Certified Seizure Goes to Root of Fair Trial Under NDPS Act : Calcutta High Court Tender Years Doctrine Is No Longer Good Law: Delhi High Court Slams Mother’s Custody Claim Built on Parental Alienation Negation of Bail is the Rule in NDPS Cases Involving Commercial Quantity: Himachal Pradesh High Court Denies Bail Single Stab Injury in Heat of Passion During Sudden Quarrel Is Not Murder: Kerala High Court Section 10 CPC Inapplicable To Labour Court Proceedings; Stay Of Individual Disputes Denied: Karnataka High Court 138 NI Act | Once Issuance and Signature on Cheque Are Admitted, Burden Shifts on Accused to Dislodge Statutory Presumption: Madras High Court Confession Cannot Substitute Proof: Bombay High Court Acquits Husband Convicted of Wife’s Murder "Sole Eyewitness Testimony, Corroborated by Medical and Recovery Evidence, Is Enough to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC: Allahabad High Court Partition Once Effected Cannot Be Reopened on Vague Allegations of Fraud: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Registered Family Partition Deed Cancellation of Land Acquisition Compensation Without Allegation or Hearing Is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Restores Compensation to Innocent Land Owner Whether Act Was in Discharge of Official Duty Is a Question of Fact — Magistrate, Not High Court, Must Decide: Supreme Court Restricts Writ Interference in BNSS Cases Section 175(4) BNSS | Affidavit Is Not Optional — Even Complaints Against Public Servants Must Follow Procedural Rigour: Supreme Court Magistrate Cannot Be Directed to Recall His Judicial Order by a Writ Court: Supreme Court Warns Against Article 226 Interference in Pending Criminal Proceedings Even In Absence of Written Demand, If Substantial Dispute Exists or Is Apprehended, Reference Under Section 10 ID Act Is Valid: Supreme Court Absence of Classical Signs of Strangulation and Possibility of Hanging Nullifies Homicidal Theory: Supreme Court Holds Medical Evidence Alone Cannot Prove Guilt Confession Must Be Direct Acknowledgment of Guilt, Not Mere Presence at Scene: Supreme Court Slams Misuse of Section 164 CrPC Reversal of Acquittal Without Dislodging Trial Court’s Reasoning Is Impermissible: Supreme Court Restores Acquittal

"Higher Standard of Rectitude Required for Law Enforcement Appointments," Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 20, 2023: The Supreme Court of India clarified the requirements and standards to be met for appointments in law enforcement agencies, particularly the police force. In a crucial judgment, the apex court stated that "the standard of rectitude to be applied to any person seeking appointment in a Law Enforcement Agency must always be higher and more rigorous."

The case came into prominence when an individual, despite being acquitted in a criminal case, had his application for a police post rejected. The appellant-State Government argued that while the individual was acquitted, the circumstances surrounding the acquittal made it clear that it was not a 'clean' one.

Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Rajesh Bindal observed, "This is a classic example of the situation contemplated in para 38.4.3 of Avatar Singh where the charges framed against the respondent herein involved moral turpitude." The court further added that a law enforcement official has the responsibility of maintaining law and order, and thus, "possession of a higher moral conduct is one of the basic requirements for appointment to a post as sensitive as that in the police service."

In the court's view, "mere acquittal of the respondent in the criminal case would not automatically entitle him to being declared fit for appointment to the subject post." The judgment emphasized that the employer has a right to consider the antecedents and moral character of the candidate for such a critical role.

According to the ruling, the State Government's decision was "not tainted by any malafides or arbitrariness," thus endorsing the need for stricter scrutiny for appointments in law enforcement agencies.

Date of Decision: September 20, 2023

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS vs BHUPENDRA YADAV         

Latest Legal News