Inability To Trace Beneficiaries Cannot Defeat Or Postpone Compensation Disbursal: Supreme Court Directs High Court Suo Motu Proceedings Disability Pension | Mere Manifestation Of Disease During Military Service Without Causal Connection Is Not Sufficient For Entitlement: Supreme Court Prevention Of Corruption Act | Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Without Proof Of Demand Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court Appointment Contrary To Statutory Requirements And Advertisement Terms Amounts To Fraud On Public: Supreme Court IT Act | Once Settlement Commission Admits Application Under Section 245C, Assessing Officer Loses Jurisdiction To Reopen Assessment Under Section 148: Supreme Court NDPS Act | Prosecution Must Establish Unbroken Chain Of Custody For Samples, Failure To Comply With Section 52-A Renders FSL Report Inadmissible: Supreme Court Section 180 BNSS | Investigating Officers Must Adopt Transparent Practices; DGP Should Consider Making Audio-Video Recording Of Witness Statements Mandatory: Allahabad High Court Rowdy Sheet Cannot Be Opened In A Mechanical Manner Based On Mere Pendency Of Two Criminal Cases: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Surname Protection Under Section 35 Trade Marks Act Not Restricted To Natural Persons': Bombay High Court Allows Corporate Body To Use Family Name Circumstantial Evidence | Prosecution Must Prove Connectivity Between Accused And Crime, Mere 'Last Seen' Theory Insufficient: Calcutta High Court Section 482 BNSS | Criminal Prosecution Against Company Directors Cannot Be Quashed When Investigation Reveals Active Role Beyond Mere Designation: Delhi High Court Cannot Be Permitted To Patch Up Weak Points: Karnataka High Court Dismisses Belated Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Plea Order XXI Rule 90 CPC | Burden To Prove Material Irregularity Or Fraud In Court Auction Sale Lies Upon Judgment Debtor: Kerala High Court Departmental Instructions Not Being Mandatory, Non-Compliance Does Not Vitiate Enquiry If Guilt Is Proved By Other Cogent Evidence: Delhi High Court Doctrine Of Res Gestae | Hearsay Evidence Can Be Admissible If Statement Is Spontaneous And Contemporaneous With The Occurrence: Madras High Court Relatives Cannot Be Roped Into Matrimonial Disputes On The Basis Of Omnibus Allegations: Madhya Pradesh High Court Grants Discharge Victim In Private Complaint Case Entitled To File Appeal Against Acquittal Before Sessions Court U/S 372 CrPC: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 58 BNSS | Detention Beyond 24 Hours Without Magistrate’s Authority Vitiates Remand, Entitles Accused To Bail: Orissa High Court Section 18 Limitation Act | Acknowledgement Of Loan In Promissory Note Extends Period Of Limitation For Entire Debt: Delhi High Court Section 138 NI Act | Existence Of Defence Founded On Disputed Facts Cannot Be Ground To Scuttle Cheque Bounce Prosecution At Inception: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Promotion Does Not Exist Under Repealed Rules Following Policy Restructuring: Supreme Court

"Higher Standard of Rectitude Required for Law Enforcement Appointments," Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 20, 2023: The Supreme Court of India clarified the requirements and standards to be met for appointments in law enforcement agencies, particularly the police force. In a crucial judgment, the apex court stated that "the standard of rectitude to be applied to any person seeking appointment in a Law Enforcement Agency must always be higher and more rigorous."

The case came into prominence when an individual, despite being acquitted in a criminal case, had his application for a police post rejected. The appellant-State Government argued that while the individual was acquitted, the circumstances surrounding the acquittal made it clear that it was not a 'clean' one.

Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Rajesh Bindal observed, "This is a classic example of the situation contemplated in para 38.4.3 of Avatar Singh where the charges framed against the respondent herein involved moral turpitude." The court further added that a law enforcement official has the responsibility of maintaining law and order, and thus, "possession of a higher moral conduct is one of the basic requirements for appointment to a post as sensitive as that in the police service."

In the court's view, "mere acquittal of the respondent in the criminal case would not automatically entitle him to being declared fit for appointment to the subject post." The judgment emphasized that the employer has a right to consider the antecedents and moral character of the candidate for such a critical role.

According to the ruling, the State Government's decision was "not tainted by any malafides or arbitrariness," thus endorsing the need for stricter scrutiny for appointments in law enforcement agencies.

Date of Decision: September 20, 2023

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS vs BHUPENDRA YADAV         

Latest Legal News