Lack Of Title Documents In Lal Dora Land Does Not Relieve Plaintiff From Proving Continuous Possession To Claim Ownership: Delhi High Court Unauthorized Video Recording Of Court Proceedings Without Prior Permission Amounts To Contempt Of Court: Bombay High Court Finality Of Litigation | State Cannot Re-Litigate Settled Decrees By Alleging Collusion After Affirmation Up To Supreme Court: Allahabad High Court SC/ST Act | Court Cannot Determine Conversion Status To Quash FIR Before Completion Of Investigation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Absence Of Manufacturing Activity And Dilapidated Condition Of Premises Constitute Valid Grounds For Closure: Bombay High Court Non-Disclosure Of Existing Insurance Policies In Proposal Form Entitles Insurer To Repudiate Claim: Calcutta High Court Will Interpretation | Bequest Of "Above Said Property" Includes Entire Estate, Not Just Descriptive Portions Mentioned Therein: Delhi High Court Limitation Act | Court Can Balance Equities By Denying Interest For Delay Period In Land Acquisition Appeals: Gujarat High Court Article 21 Constitution Of India | Personal Liberty Of Detenue Cannot Be Curtailed Without Authority Of Law Post-Acquittal: Jharkhand High Court Order 8 Rule 1A CPC | Trial Court Should Not Reject Documents Merely For Delay If Foundation Is Laid In Pleadings: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order XXII CPC Applies To SCC Suits; Rule 25 Of U.P. Urban Buildings Rules Does Not Govern Substitution Where Act Is Inapplicable: Allahabad High Court Recruitment Authorities Cannot Insist On Impossible Experience Criteria: Karnataka High Court Rules Against Rejection Of Motor Vehicle Inspector Candidates Order 38 Rule 8 CPC | Claim Petition Cannot Be Allowed Ex-Parte Without Adjudication On Merits: Kerala High Court Succession Certificate Under Section 372 Indian Succession Act Cannot Be Granted When Title Is Subject To Intricate Questions Of Fact And Law: Madras High Court SARFAESI Act | District Magistrate Cannot Adjudicate Disputes Between Borrower And Secured Creditor While Assisting Possession: Madhya Pradesh High Court Termination Based On Caste Status Without Cancellation Of Original Certificate Is Legally Unsustainable: Orissa High Court Section 13 Punjab Village Common Lands Act | Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted In Private Injunction Suits Where Title Against Panchayat Is Not Sought: High Court Rights Of Persons With Disabilities Act  | Equal Opportunity Policy Of Employer Is Mandatory; Routine Transfer Policy Must Yield To Special Provisions For Caregivers: Rajasthan High Court Compensation Must Be Just, Not A Pittance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Award In Motor Accident Claim Registration Act | Sub-Registrar Has No Power To Adjudicate Title Or Refuse Registration Based On Unauthorized Layouts: Telangana High Court Section 50 NDPS Act | Failure To Individually Communicate Right To Be Searched Before Gazetted Officer Or Magistrate Vitiates Conviction: Telangana High Court

"Higher Standard of Rectitude Required for Law Enforcement Appointments," Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 20, 2023: The Supreme Court of India clarified the requirements and standards to be met for appointments in law enforcement agencies, particularly the police force. In a crucial judgment, the apex court stated that "the standard of rectitude to be applied to any person seeking appointment in a Law Enforcement Agency must always be higher and more rigorous."

The case came into prominence when an individual, despite being acquitted in a criminal case, had his application for a police post rejected. The appellant-State Government argued that while the individual was acquitted, the circumstances surrounding the acquittal made it clear that it was not a 'clean' one.

Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Rajesh Bindal observed, "This is a classic example of the situation contemplated in para 38.4.3 of Avatar Singh where the charges framed against the respondent herein involved moral turpitude." The court further added that a law enforcement official has the responsibility of maintaining law and order, and thus, "possession of a higher moral conduct is one of the basic requirements for appointment to a post as sensitive as that in the police service."

In the court's view, "mere acquittal of the respondent in the criminal case would not automatically entitle him to being declared fit for appointment to the subject post." The judgment emphasized that the employer has a right to consider the antecedents and moral character of the candidate for such a critical role.

According to the ruling, the State Government's decision was "not tainted by any malafides or arbitrariness," thus endorsing the need for stricter scrutiny for appointments in law enforcement agencies.

Date of Decision: September 20, 2023

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS vs BHUPENDRA YADAV         

Latest Legal News