Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

High Court Upholds ITAT Decision, States 'No Assessment Proceedings Pending, No Basis for Section 153A Initiation'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the High Court of Patna has affirmed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)'s ruling on the assessment under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case revolved around whether the Assessing Officer could initiate proceedings under Section 153A when there were no pending assessments at the time of the initiation.

The Court re-framed the key issue in the case as: "Whether the ITAT was justified in finding the assessment under Section 153A bad, on the consideration that no assessment proceedings were pending as on the date of initiation of proceedings under Section 153A?" The Honorable Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran, along with Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy, presided over the case.

The appellant, the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1, Patna, challenged the ITAT's findings, which had ruled in favor of the respondent, Satish Kumar Keshri of M/s Hira Panna Jewellers.

Citing the Tribunal's reliance on a previous High Court of Delhi judgment, the Court summarized, "The Tribunal was perfectly within the statutory framework, in making a remand directing the Assessing Officer to carry out re-assessment of the assessment year 2002-03, which stood completed as on the date of initiation of Section 153A proceedings, if some incriminating material seized during the search is available."

In its conclusive remarks, the High Court stated, "We bow to the proposition as declared by the High Court of Delhi and affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and answer the question framed in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue."

With this ruling, the High Court has set a precedent that could have far-reaching implications for tax assessments, particularly in cases where there are no pending assessments at the time of initiation under Section 153A. The appeal filed by the Revenue was consequently rejected, solidifying the ITAT's original decision.

Date of Decision: 21-07-2023

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs Satish Kumar

Latest Legal News