High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

High Court Upholds ITAT Decision, States 'No Assessment Proceedings Pending, No Basis for Section 153A Initiation'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the High Court of Patna has affirmed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)'s ruling on the assessment under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case revolved around whether the Assessing Officer could initiate proceedings under Section 153A when there were no pending assessments at the time of the initiation.

The Court re-framed the key issue in the case as: "Whether the ITAT was justified in finding the assessment under Section 153A bad, on the consideration that no assessment proceedings were pending as on the date of initiation of proceedings under Section 153A?" The Honorable Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran, along with Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy, presided over the case.

The appellant, the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1, Patna, challenged the ITAT's findings, which had ruled in favor of the respondent, Satish Kumar Keshri of M/s Hira Panna Jewellers.

Citing the Tribunal's reliance on a previous High Court of Delhi judgment, the Court summarized, "The Tribunal was perfectly within the statutory framework, in making a remand directing the Assessing Officer to carry out re-assessment of the assessment year 2002-03, which stood completed as on the date of initiation of Section 153A proceedings, if some incriminating material seized during the search is available."

In its conclusive remarks, the High Court stated, "We bow to the proposition as declared by the High Court of Delhi and affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and answer the question framed in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue."

With this ruling, the High Court has set a precedent that could have far-reaching implications for tax assessments, particularly in cases where there are no pending assessments at the time of initiation under Section 153A. The appeal filed by the Revenue was consequently rejected, solidifying the ITAT's original decision.

Date of Decision: 21-07-2023

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs Satish Kumar

Latest Legal News