Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

High Court Upholds ITAT Decision, States 'No Assessment Proceedings Pending, No Basis for Section 153A Initiation'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the High Court of Patna has affirmed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)'s ruling on the assessment under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case revolved around whether the Assessing Officer could initiate proceedings under Section 153A when there were no pending assessments at the time of the initiation.

The Court re-framed the key issue in the case as: "Whether the ITAT was justified in finding the assessment under Section 153A bad, on the consideration that no assessment proceedings were pending as on the date of initiation of proceedings under Section 153A?" The Honorable Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran, along with Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy, presided over the case.

The appellant, the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1, Patna, challenged the ITAT's findings, which had ruled in favor of the respondent, Satish Kumar Keshri of M/s Hira Panna Jewellers.

Citing the Tribunal's reliance on a previous High Court of Delhi judgment, the Court summarized, "The Tribunal was perfectly within the statutory framework, in making a remand directing the Assessing Officer to carry out re-assessment of the assessment year 2002-03, which stood completed as on the date of initiation of Section 153A proceedings, if some incriminating material seized during the search is available."

In its conclusive remarks, the High Court stated, "We bow to the proposition as declared by the High Court of Delhi and affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and answer the question framed in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue."

With this ruling, the High Court has set a precedent that could have far-reaching implications for tax assessments, particularly in cases where there are no pending assessments at the time of initiation under Section 153A. The appeal filed by the Revenue was consequently rejected, solidifying the ITAT's original decision.

Date of Decision: 21-07-2023

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs Satish Kumar

Latest Legal News