Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court Possession Of 'Bhang' Not An Offence Under NDPS Act, Specific Definition Excludes It: Jharkhand High Court Acquits Man Trial Court Cannot Reject Request For Handwriting Expert Merely Because Signatures Are On Photocopies: Punjab & Haryana High Court

FSL Report Crucial: Challan Without Report as Incomplete, Grants Default Bail: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court has recently passed a judgment granting default bail to a petitioner in a criminal case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. The case in question is Rajesh Kalra v. State of Haryana.

The petitioner was apprehended with a commercial quantity of medical intoxicants in his possession and was sent to custody on August 17, 2022. The police presented a challan against the petitioner on February 9, 2023, but it was filed without the report from the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL). The petitioner's counsel argued that the challan was incomplete as a result, and that the petitioner was entitled to default bail as the statutory period of 180 days had elapsed without the FSL report being filed.

The state's counsel argued that the challan was not incomplete, but the court held that the FSL report was a material document that goes to the root of the case, and filing a challan without it is not considered a complete challan. The court referred to previous judgments in similar cases, including Jagvinder Singh v. State of Haryana, Ajaib Singh v. State of Haryana, and Joginder Singh v. State of Haryana, all of which held that filing a challan without the FSL report constitutes an incomplete challan. The court also noted that the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mohammad Arbaz and others v. State of NCT and Delhi granted relief to the accused under similar circumstances.

The court further noted that no application or report was filed by the Public Prosecutor within the prescribed statutory period of 180 days, and the report of the FSL was still awaited as of April 6, 2023. Accordingly, the court set aside the trial court's order rejecting default bail and ordered the petitioner's release on default bail, subject to the furnishing of the requisite bail bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court/Special Judge (Duty).

This judgment reiterates the importance of filing a complete challan within the statutory period and the crucial role that the FSL report plays in NDPS cases. It also serves as a reminder to Public Prosecutors to be vigilant in seeking extensions of time if needed to complete investigations and file a complete challan.

Rajesh Kalra v. State of Haryana

Latest Legal News