Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

FSL Report Crucial: Challan Without Report as Incomplete, Grants Default Bail: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court has recently passed a judgment granting default bail to a petitioner in a criminal case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. The case in question is Rajesh Kalra v. State of Haryana.

The petitioner was apprehended with a commercial quantity of medical intoxicants in his possession and was sent to custody on August 17, 2022. The police presented a challan against the petitioner on February 9, 2023, but it was filed without the report from the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL). The petitioner's counsel argued that the challan was incomplete as a result, and that the petitioner was entitled to default bail as the statutory period of 180 days had elapsed without the FSL report being filed.

The state's counsel argued that the challan was not incomplete, but the court held that the FSL report was a material document that goes to the root of the case, and filing a challan without it is not considered a complete challan. The court referred to previous judgments in similar cases, including Jagvinder Singh v. State of Haryana, Ajaib Singh v. State of Haryana, and Joginder Singh v. State of Haryana, all of which held that filing a challan without the FSL report constitutes an incomplete challan. The court also noted that the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mohammad Arbaz and others v. State of NCT and Delhi granted relief to the accused under similar circumstances.

The court further noted that no application or report was filed by the Public Prosecutor within the prescribed statutory period of 180 days, and the report of the FSL was still awaited as of April 6, 2023. Accordingly, the court set aside the trial court's order rejecting default bail and ordered the petitioner's release on default bail, subject to the furnishing of the requisite bail bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court/Special Judge (Duty).

This judgment reiterates the importance of filing a complete challan within the statutory period and the crucial role that the FSL report plays in NDPS cases. It also serves as a reminder to Public Prosecutors to be vigilant in seeking extensions of time if needed to complete investigations and file a complete challan.

Rajesh Kalra v. State of Haryana

Latest Legal News