Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Fairness in Investigation Crucial, Concealment of Objections by Forensic Lab Fatal to Prosecution: High Court Acquits in N.D.P.S. Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, under the bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain, acquitted Zorawar Singh @ Shenty in the case of unauthorized possession of narcotic drugs, overturning the trial court’s conviction under Section 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

Brief on Legal Point:

This case primarily revolved around the legal intricacies of fairness in the investigation process under the N.D.P.S. Act. The key issue was the validity of the appellant’s conviction, given the alleged irregularities in the investigation.

Facts and Issues Arising:

Zorawar Singh was convicted by the Special Court, Patiala, for possessing 400 MICROLIT Tablets, a narcotic substance. The appellant’s counsel challenged the trial’s integrity, citing discrepancies in the FIR, search memo, and recovery memos. Particularly contentious was the prior knowledge of the Investigating Officer (I.O.) regarding the FIR number and the nature of the offence before the recovery.

Detailed Court Assessment:

Flaws in Investigation and Trial Process: The court noted discrepancies in the FIR and recovery memos, suggesting premeditated charging under Section 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The I.O.’s prior knowledge of the offence raised doubts about the investigation’s transparency.

Concealment by Forensic Lab: The concealment of objections raised by the Forensic Lab was deemed a significant lapse. This non-disclosure was seen as a violation of the principle of a fair trial.

Fairness of Investigation: Emphasizing the importance of a fair investigation, especially in narcotic cases, the court criticized the secretive approach adopted by the I.O. and the prosecution, undermining the trial’s integrity.

Decision: Considering these significant flaws, the High Court set aside the trial court’s judgment and acquitted Zorawar Singh of the charges under Section 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

 

Date of Decision: March 04, 2024

 Zorawar Singh @ Shenty Vs. State of Punjab

Similar News