Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Fairness in Investigation Crucial, Concealment of Objections by Forensic Lab Fatal to Prosecution: High Court Acquits in N.D.P.S. Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, under the bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain, acquitted Zorawar Singh @ Shenty in the case of unauthorized possession of narcotic drugs, overturning the trial court’s conviction under Section 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

Brief on Legal Point:

This case primarily revolved around the legal intricacies of fairness in the investigation process under the N.D.P.S. Act. The key issue was the validity of the appellant’s conviction, given the alleged irregularities in the investigation.

Facts and Issues Arising:

Zorawar Singh was convicted by the Special Court, Patiala, for possessing 400 MICROLIT Tablets, a narcotic substance. The appellant’s counsel challenged the trial’s integrity, citing discrepancies in the FIR, search memo, and recovery memos. Particularly contentious was the prior knowledge of the Investigating Officer (I.O.) regarding the FIR number and the nature of the offence before the recovery.

Detailed Court Assessment:

Flaws in Investigation and Trial Process: The court noted discrepancies in the FIR and recovery memos, suggesting premeditated charging under Section 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The I.O.’s prior knowledge of the offence raised doubts about the investigation’s transparency.

Concealment by Forensic Lab: The concealment of objections raised by the Forensic Lab was deemed a significant lapse. This non-disclosure was seen as a violation of the principle of a fair trial.

Fairness of Investigation: Emphasizing the importance of a fair investigation, especially in narcotic cases, the court criticized the secretive approach adopted by the I.O. and the prosecution, undermining the trial’s integrity.

Decision: Considering these significant flaws, the High Court set aside the trial court’s judgment and acquitted Zorawar Singh of the charges under Section 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

 

Date of Decision: March 04, 2024

 Zorawar Singh @ Shenty Vs. State of Punjab

Similar News