-
by sayum
28 July 2026 1:44 PM
In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, under the bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain, acquitted Zorawar Singh @ Shenty in the case of unauthorized possession of narcotic drugs, overturning the trial court’s conviction under Section 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
Brief on Legal Point:
This case primarily revolved around the legal intricacies of fairness in the investigation process under the N.D.P.S. Act. The key issue was the validity of the appellant’s conviction, given the alleged irregularities in the investigation.
Facts and Issues Arising:
Zorawar Singh was convicted by the Special Court, Patiala, for possessing 400 MICROLIT Tablets, a narcotic substance. The appellant’s counsel challenged the trial’s integrity, citing discrepancies in the FIR, search memo, and recovery memos. Particularly contentious was the prior knowledge of the Investigating Officer (I.O.) regarding the FIR number and the nature of the offence before the recovery.
Detailed Court Assessment:
Flaws in Investigation and Trial Process: The court noted discrepancies in the FIR and recovery memos, suggesting premeditated charging under Section 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The I.O.’s prior knowledge of the offence raised doubts about the investigation’s transparency.
Concealment by Forensic Lab: The concealment of objections raised by the Forensic Lab was deemed a significant lapse. This non-disclosure was seen as a violation of the principle of a fair trial.
Fairness of Investigation: Emphasizing the importance of a fair investigation, especially in narcotic cases, the court criticized the secretive approach adopted by the I.O. and the prosecution, undermining the trial’s integrity.
Decision: Considering these significant flaws, the High Court set aside the trial court’s judgment and acquitted Zorawar Singh of the charges under Section 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
Date of Decision: March 04, 2024
Zorawar Singh @ Shenty Vs. State of Punjab
