Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix, If Credible, Is Enough to Convict: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Cheque Issued as Security Still Attracts Section 138 NI Act If Liability Exists on Date of Presentation: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity Law of Limitation Binds All Equally, Including the State: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 5743 Days’ Delay Once Selected, All Are Equals: Allahabad High Court Slams State for Withholding Pay Protection From Later Batches of Ex-Servicemen Constables Non-Compliance With Section 42 of NDPS Act Is Fatal to Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Two Accused In 160 Kg Poppy Husk Case Unregistered Agreement Creating Right of Way Inadmissible in Evidence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Summary Decree in Partition Suit Denied: Unequivocal Admissions Absent, Full Trial Necessary: Delhi High Court No Court Can Allow Itself to Be Used as an Instrument of Fraud: Delhi High Court Exposes Forged Writ Petition Filed in Name of Unaware Citizen "Deliberate Wage Splitting to Evade Provident Fund Dues Is Illegal": Bombay High Court Restores PF Authority's 7A Order Against Saket College and Centrum Direct Anti-Suit Injunction in Matrimonial Dispute Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Stall UK Divorce Proceedings Filed by Wife

Considering Medical Evidence, Opportunity Deserves to be Granted: Bombay High Court Permits Student with Internet Gaming Disorder to Take Improvement Exam

18 November 2024 1:36 PM

By: sayum


High Court allows improvement exam for student under special medical circumstances, setting a compassionate precedent Mumbai, July 2024 – The High Court of Judicature at Bombay has permitted Aradhya Arvind Singh, a bright student diagnosed with Internet Gaming Disorder and depression, to appear for the improvement examination in July 2024. This decision comes after Aradhya missed his scheduled improvement exams due to his medical condition and ongoing treatment. The bench, comprising Justices A.S. Chandurkar and Rajesh S. Patil, emphasized the need to consider medical circumstances while interpreting regulatory provisions.

Aradhya Arvind Singh, residing in Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, had an impressive academic record with scores ranging between 85% to 93% up to the 11th standard. However, during his Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination in March 2023, he was battling depression and was subsequently diagnosed with Internet Gaming Disorder. Due to these health issues, he scored 319 marks out of 600.

From July 2023 to December 2023, Aradhya underwent treatment at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Hospital, which incapacitated him from appearing in the immediately succeeding improvement examination as mandated by the Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Regulations. After his treatment, he sought permission to appear in the March 2024 examination, but did not receive a response, prompting him to approach the High Court.

The court acknowledged the petitioner’s medical history and the authenticity of his treatment records. Justice Chandurkar remarked, “The documents on record, including the medical reports from Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Hospital, indicate that the petitioner was undergoing treatment for Internet Gaming Disorder at least till the end of December 2023. The authenticity of those documents is not doubted.”

The court reviewed Clause 92.6 of the Maharashtra State Board Regulations, which stipulates that students seeking to improve their marks must do so in the immediate subsequent examination. However, it found that the petitioner’s medical condition warranted an exception. The bench noted, “Though it is necessary for the student to seek such improvement in his marks in the succeeding examination, the same has not been possible for the petitioner.”

In light of the peculiar facts of the case, the bench determined that denying Aradhya the opportunity to improve his marks would be unjust. “In the interest of justice, subject to the petitioner making the requisite application seeking permission to appear in July-2024 Examination with the respondent no.3-College, coupled with payment of necessary late fees, he shall be permitted to appear in the July-2024 Examination that is to commence from 16th July 2024,” stated the court.

While granting this relief, the court was cautious to clarify that this decision was specific to the circumstances of the case and should not set a general precedent. “Since these directions are issued in the backdrop of the petitioner’s ailments and in the peculiar facts of the case, the same shall not be treated as precedent,” the judgment emphasized.

The High Court’s decision underscores the judiciary’s sensitivity to individual circumstances, particularly in educational contexts where health issues impede academic progression. By allowing Aradhya to appear for the improvement examination, the court has reinforced the importance of considering medical conditions while applying rigid regulatory frameworks. This judgment is a significant step towards ensuring that students with genuine medical issues are not disadvantaged in their academic pursuits.

Date of Decision: July 4, 2024

Latest Legal News