Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Ban on Teacher Recruitment Doesn't Apply to Minority Institutions: Bombay High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Bombay High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, has ruled that the ban on teacher recruitment imposed by the State Government does not apply to minority institutions. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising of Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan and Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke on October 26, 2023.

The case involved Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Samaj Sudharak Mandal, a registered Minority Institution, seeking approval for the appointment of a teacher. The Education Officer had previously rejected the approval, citing the state's ban on recruitment due to financial constraints caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bombay High court's decision emphasized the special status of minority institutions and their protection under Article 30 of the Constitution of India. The judgment referred to previous coordinated bench rulings, which held that the ban on recruitment should not be applicable to such institutions.

In the words of the bench, "It has been consistently held by the coordinate benches of this Court that a ban on recruitment was not applicable to the minority institutions and that the said ground could not be raised for refusing approval to the appointment/s as made."

The court further directed the Education Officer to reconsider the proposal in light of the coordinated bench judgments within four weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioners within one week thereafter.

This ruling sets a precedent for minority institutions seeking teacher appointments during times of government-imposed bans, upholding their rights and protecting their interests.

Date of Decision: 26/10/2023

Babasaheb Ambedkar VS State of Maharashtra

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/26-Oct-2023-Dr-Babasaheb-Ambedkar-Vs-State-Maharastra.pdf"]

Latest Legal News