Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Ban on Teacher Recruitment Doesn't Apply to Minority Institutions: Bombay High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Bombay High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, has ruled that the ban on teacher recruitment imposed by the State Government does not apply to minority institutions. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising of Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan and Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke on October 26, 2023.

The case involved Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Samaj Sudharak Mandal, a registered Minority Institution, seeking approval for the appointment of a teacher. The Education Officer had previously rejected the approval, citing the state's ban on recruitment due to financial constraints caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bombay High court's decision emphasized the special status of minority institutions and their protection under Article 30 of the Constitution of India. The judgment referred to previous coordinated bench rulings, which held that the ban on recruitment should not be applicable to such institutions.

In the words of the bench, "It has been consistently held by the coordinate benches of this Court that a ban on recruitment was not applicable to the minority institutions and that the said ground could not be raised for refusing approval to the appointment/s as made."

The court further directed the Education Officer to reconsider the proposal in light of the coordinated bench judgments within four weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioners within one week thereafter.

This ruling sets a precedent for minority institutions seeking teacher appointments during times of government-imposed bans, upholding their rights and protecting their interests.

Date of Decision: 26/10/2023

Babasaheb Ambedkar VS State of Maharashtra

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/26-Oct-2023-Dr-Babasaheb-Ambedkar-Vs-State-Maharastra.pdf"]

Similar News