TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Ban on Teacher Recruitment Doesn't Apply to Minority Institutions: Bombay High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Bombay High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, has ruled that the ban on teacher recruitment imposed by the State Government does not apply to minority institutions. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising of Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan and Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke on October 26, 2023.

The case involved Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Samaj Sudharak Mandal, a registered Minority Institution, seeking approval for the appointment of a teacher. The Education Officer had previously rejected the approval, citing the state's ban on recruitment due to financial constraints caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bombay High court's decision emphasized the special status of minority institutions and their protection under Article 30 of the Constitution of India. The judgment referred to previous coordinated bench rulings, which held that the ban on recruitment should not be applicable to such institutions.

In the words of the bench, "It has been consistently held by the coordinate benches of this Court that a ban on recruitment was not applicable to the minority institutions and that the said ground could not be raised for refusing approval to the appointment/s as made."

The court further directed the Education Officer to reconsider the proposal in light of the coordinated bench judgments within four weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioners within one week thereafter.

This ruling sets a precedent for minority institutions seeking teacher appointments during times of government-imposed bans, upholding their rights and protecting their interests.

Date of Decision: 26/10/2023

Babasaheb Ambedkar VS State of Maharashtra

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/26-Oct-2023-Dr-Babasaheb-Ambedkar-Vs-State-Maharastra.pdf"]

Latest Legal News