Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization Sentence Cannot Be Reduced to Two Months for Four Life-Threatening Stab Wounds: Supreme Court Restores 3-Year RI in Attempt to Murder Case Suspicion, However Grave, Cannot Substitute Proof: Apex Court Reaffirms Limits of Section 106 IEA Accused at the Time of the Statement Was Not in the Custody of the Police - Discovery Statement Held Inadmissible Under Section 27: Supreme Court Failure to Explain What Happened After ‘Last Seen Together’ Becomes an Additional Link: Supreme Court Strengthens Section 106 Evidence Act Doctrine Suicide in a Pact Is Conditional Upon Mutual Participation — Survivor’s Resolve Reinforces the Act: Supreme Court Affirms Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Participation in Draw Does Not Cure Illegality: Supreme Court Rejects Estoppel in Arbitrary Flat Allotment Case Nepotism and Self-Aggrandizement Are Anathema to a Democratic System: Supreme Court Quashes Allotment of Super Deluxe Flats by Government Employees’ Welfare Society Liberty Is Not Absolute When It Becomes a Threat to Society: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Alleged ₹6.5 Crore Fraud Mastermind Magistrate’s Power Is Limited — Sessions Court May Yet Try the Case: Supreme Court Corrects High Court’s Misconception in ₹6.5 Crore Fraud Bail Order Dacoity Cannot Be Presumed, It Must Be Proved: Allahabad High Court Acquits Villagers After 43 Years, Citing ‘Glaring Lapses’ in Prosecution Case When the Judge Signs with the Prosecutor, Justice Is Already Compromised: MP High Court Quashes Tainted Medical College Enquiry Strict Rules Of Evidence Do Not Apply To Proceedings Before The Family Court: Kerala High Court Upholds Wife’s Claim For Gold And Money Commission Workers Cannot Claim Status of Civil Servants: Gujarat High Court Declines Regularization of Physically Challenged Case-Paper Operators Non-Wearing of Helmet Had a Direct Nexus with Fatal Head Injuries  : Madras High Court Upholds 25% Contributory Negligence for Helmet Violation Only a ‘Person Aggrieved’ Can Prosecute Defamation – Political Party Must Be Properly Represented: Karnataka High Court Quashes Case Against Rahul Gandhi

Bail Granted to  first-time offender under NDPS Act - right to speedy trial – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 21 April 2023,  Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Karanveer Singh @ Karan in a case under Section 22(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was made by Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, who heard the petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.PC) seeking the grant of regular bail in FIR No. 15 dated 22.01.2021 registered at Police Station Sadar, Muktsar, District Sri Muktsar Sahib.

The brief facts of the case are that while the police party was on patrolling duty, two youngsters were seen near a bridge holding a plastic bag. Upon seeing the police party, they tried to flee from the spot after throwing the polythene bag but were caught. They were identified as Mukesh Kumar @ Sanju (since granted bail vide order dated 17.03.2023 passed in CRM-M-12313-2023) and Karanveer Singh @ Karan (petitioner). A search of the bag revealed 4800 tablets of RLAM-0.5. Based on the said recovery, the instant FIR was registered.

The petitioner claimed that he has been falsely implicated in the present case and that the recovery has been planted upon him. No independent witness was joined during the course of search and seizure. He further argued that there was a violation of mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act such as Section 42 and 50, and as he was a first-time offender, and his co-accused Mukesh Kumar @ Sanju had been granted bail, he was entitled to the concession of bail.

The Counsel for the State argued that a commercial quantity of contraband had been recovered from the petitioner, and therefore, in view of the bar contained under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the petitioner was not entitled to the grant of bail. However, he admitted that the co-accused had been granted the concession of bail.

After hearing both the sides, the High Court relied on the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which provides for the right to speedy trial, and held that provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted in cases where there is a delay in the trial proceedings. The Court also considered the petitioner's status as a first-time offender and the fact that none of the 15 prosecution witnesses had been examined so far.

The Court cited the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Nitish Adhikary @ Bapan Vs. The State of West Bengal SLP (Crl.) Nos.5769/2022 Decided on 01.08.2022 and the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Balraj Singh Vs. State of Punjab CRM-M-57386-2022 Decided on 14.12.2022. In both cases, bail was granted to the accused based on similar grounds.

The High Court allowed the petition and ordered the release of Karanveer Singh @ Karan on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned CJM/Duty Magistrate, concerned. The petitioner was also ordered to appear before the police station concerned on the first Monday of every month till the conclusion of the trial and inform in writing each time that he is not involved in any other crime other than the present one. Additionally, he was asked to prepare an FDR in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and deposit the same with the Trial Court. The same would be liable to be forfeited as per law in case of the absence of the petitioner from trial without sufficient cause.

Karanveer Singh @ Karan Vs State of Punjab 

Latest Legal News