Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Bail Granted to  first-time offender under NDPS Act - right to speedy trial – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 21 April 2023,  Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Karanveer Singh @ Karan in a case under Section 22(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was made by Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, who heard the petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.PC) seeking the grant of regular bail in FIR No. 15 dated 22.01.2021 registered at Police Station Sadar, Muktsar, District Sri Muktsar Sahib.

The brief facts of the case are that while the police party was on patrolling duty, two youngsters were seen near a bridge holding a plastic bag. Upon seeing the police party, they tried to flee from the spot after throwing the polythene bag but were caught. They were identified as Mukesh Kumar @ Sanju (since granted bail vide order dated 17.03.2023 passed in CRM-M-12313-2023) and Karanveer Singh @ Karan (petitioner). A search of the bag revealed 4800 tablets of RLAM-0.5. Based on the said recovery, the instant FIR was registered.

The petitioner claimed that he has been falsely implicated in the present case and that the recovery has been planted upon him. No independent witness was joined during the course of search and seizure. He further argued that there was a violation of mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act such as Section 42 and 50, and as he was a first-time offender, and his co-accused Mukesh Kumar @ Sanju had been granted bail, he was entitled to the concession of bail.

The Counsel for the State argued that a commercial quantity of contraband had been recovered from the petitioner, and therefore, in view of the bar contained under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the petitioner was not entitled to the grant of bail. However, he admitted that the co-accused had been granted the concession of bail.

After hearing both the sides, the High Court relied on the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which provides for the right to speedy trial, and held that provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted in cases where there is a delay in the trial proceedings. The Court also considered the petitioner's status as a first-time offender and the fact that none of the 15 prosecution witnesses had been examined so far.

The Court cited the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Nitish Adhikary @ Bapan Vs. The State of West Bengal SLP (Crl.) Nos.5769/2022 Decided on 01.08.2022 and the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Balraj Singh Vs. State of Punjab CRM-M-57386-2022 Decided on 14.12.2022. In both cases, bail was granted to the accused based on similar grounds.

The High Court allowed the petition and ordered the release of Karanveer Singh @ Karan on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned CJM/Duty Magistrate, concerned. The petitioner was also ordered to appear before the police station concerned on the first Monday of every month till the conclusion of the trial and inform in writing each time that he is not involved in any other crime other than the present one. Additionally, he was asked to prepare an FDR in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and deposit the same with the Trial Court. The same would be liable to be forfeited as per law in case of the absence of the petitioner from trial without sufficient cause.

Karanveer Singh @ Karan Vs State of Punjab 

Latest Legal News