Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Bail Granted in NDPS Case - Trial is Yet to Commence and Petitioners Have Been in Custody for Long - Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant order, the Supreme Court of India granted bail to two petitioners, Badsha SK and Rafikul Islam @ Kalu, who have been in custody for more than two years. The bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal made the decision after considering the length of the petitioners’ custody and the nature of the charges against them.

“The above would show that the trial is yet to commence in the matter(s) and in the meantime, petitioners have been in custody for long,” the bench observed. The Court noted that the State counsel has indicated that the first prosecution witness is scheduled to testify on December 14, 2023. [Para 4-5]

The petitioners were charged under FIR No. 342 of 2021 for carrying 100 bottles of Phensedyl Cough Syrup containing Codeine Phosphate. “Considering the above and the nature of the contraband involved, we deem it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioners,” stated the judgment. [Para 6]

The Court also mentioned that the State counsel indicated there are “no known criminal antecedents” against the accused. [Para 5]

The judgment has disposed of the Special Leave Petitions and stated that any pending applications, if present, shall stand closed. [Para 7-8]

The petitioner was represented by Mr. Anjan Datta, Adv., among others, while the State of West Bengal was represented by Mr. Shreyas Awasthi, Adv.

The decision has reignited conversations around the speed of trial processes and the importance of bail in prolonged custody situations.

Date of Decision: 13-09-2023

BADSHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL           

Latest Legal News