Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Bail Granted in NDPS Case - Trial is Yet to Commence and Petitioners Have Been in Custody for Long - Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant order, the Supreme Court of India granted bail to two petitioners, Badsha SK and Rafikul Islam @ Kalu, who have been in custody for more than two years. The bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal made the decision after considering the length of the petitioners’ custody and the nature of the charges against them.

“The above would show that the trial is yet to commence in the matter(s) and in the meantime, petitioners have been in custody for long,” the bench observed. The Court noted that the State counsel has indicated that the first prosecution witness is scheduled to testify on December 14, 2023. [Para 4-5]

The petitioners were charged under FIR No. 342 of 2021 for carrying 100 bottles of Phensedyl Cough Syrup containing Codeine Phosphate. “Considering the above and the nature of the contraband involved, we deem it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioners,” stated the judgment. [Para 6]

The Court also mentioned that the State counsel indicated there are “no known criminal antecedents” against the accused. [Para 5]

The judgment has disposed of the Special Leave Petitions and stated that any pending applications, if present, shall stand closed. [Para 7-8]

The petitioner was represented by Mr. Anjan Datta, Adv., among others, while the State of West Bengal was represented by Mr. Shreyas Awasthi, Adv.

The decision has reignited conversations around the speed of trial processes and the importance of bail in prolonged custody situations.

Date of Decision: 13-09-2023

BADSHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL           

Latest Legal News